What's new

Wrong Facts on Chanakya

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who's "us"?
Some poor pathetic Dravidain farmer in the South?
Or a real Indo-Aryan in the north?

LOLz... Hindostanis today have as much to do with IVC as white Americans have to do with Natives...

We Pakistanis want your kind deported back to Africa or Australia, wherever your ancestors came from...
If you dont wanna go, I understand. Just change your countrys name to Gangia... as you have nothing to do with the Indus..

In fact Indo and Aryan are different from Dravidian like you folk. I dont know whats up with the inferiority complex you guys show.

You are just a Yemeni refugee. We saved you when you ran from the Islamic bigots hounding you and now you can go back.
 
History is not a particularly strong subject with such folks.

Perhaps they don't understand the reaction when they try to abuse others' icons.

If they knew who will get abused in return, at least some will learn to be more discrete. ;)

Jo khud ki history ko kayaron ki tarah dushman (central Asian Islamic invaders) ke joote ke neeche dabaa gaye, wo doosron ki history kya yaad rakhenge?
 
Thanks
***** Please!!!! The Chanakya Guy is here....



Seems like many of the Pakistanis are still obsessed with the BS texts of their crap Pakistani Studies Textbooks which turns their young scholars to merely A$$holes....

The content of Pakistan's official textbooks has often been criticized by several sources including many within Pakistan for sometimes promoting religious intolerance and Indophobia...And the result is not far to seek as many comments posted by our Paksitani Friends just depict the same...

A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'." :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo: Jalal points out that even an acclaimed scholar like Jameel Jalibi questions the validity of a national history that seeks to "claim Pakistan's pre-Islamic past" in an attempt to compete with India's historic antiquity. K. Ali's two volume history designed for BA students traces the pre-history of the 'Indo-Pakistan' subcontinent to the Paleolithic Age and consistently refers to the post-1947 frontiers of Pakistan while discussing the Dravidians and the Aryans.:omghaha::omghaha:

An editorial in Pakistan's oldest newspaper Dawn commenting on a report in The Guardian on Pakistani Textbooks noted 'By propagating concepts such as jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, India’s ingrained enmity with Pakistan, etc., the textbook board publications used by all government schools promote a mindset that is bigoted and obscurantist. Since there are more children studying in these schools than in madrassahs the damage done is greater.



Oh Yeah, Paksitani has never achieved anything in history as such or what to achieve when they are born that way^^^Stupidity flows in blood^^^....
So, this is what they learn.
@Armstrong yaar really? ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
after a long mud slinging period,where the discussion is stand now???India was part of Pakistan or Pakistan was part of India???
 
Thanks
So, this is what they learn.
@Armstrong yaar really? ?

Its complicated !

The Muhammad Bin Qasim part is true but it should be understand in the context in which Jinnah used it to be instead of looked on with such ignorant incredulousness that one doesn't understand what was meant with that !

At any rate I don't see anything wrong with claiming Pakistan's Pre-Islamic past because after all the Pashtuns, Baluch, Punjabis, Saraikis, Sindhis & Kashmiris have been living here for thousands of years & the past, if it must belong to someone, belongs to them not someone sitting in Madras or Bombay.

The rest is something I've never read myself so I can comment; maybe in some other Local Board they teach that but not where I was studying & my Pakistan Studies books were Ministry Approved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
after a long mud slinging period,where the discussion is stand now???India was part of Pakistan or Pakistan was part of India???

Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, KPK, Kashmir, were independent states when the British invaded and colonized them and called their colony "British India". when the British left in 1947, India was born. There was no such thing as British India or India before the British Invasion.
 
You can not argue with Hindu mentality with common sense. They live in a world of delusion and chronic lies. What sort of a man worship cows, rats and pigs? Imagine what sort of mentality he must have to do such a thing. He must lie to himself day and night to live in a world of delusion. One might argue if that man would be considered sane at all...

Again mods. You keep on giving infractions and handing out bans to me for discussing "banned topics".

I just have to give it a shot about what he really worships and this pathetic self loath will set himself off to meet his 72 (as promised).
 
You can not argue with Hindu mentality with common sense. They live in a world of delusion and chronic lies. What sort of a man worship cows, rats and pigs? Imagine what sort of mentality he must have to do such a thing. He must lie to himself day and night to live in a world of delusion. One might argue if that man would be considered sane at all...

Dnt confuse your idol as Hindu....

You can worship pigs not hindu.
 
Funny pakistanis want to claim IVC and ancient hindu and buddist culture of the region as ancint pakistan history , at the same time would have none of it in their own lives , e,g Baisakhi celebration has been part punjabi culture since time immemorial now discarded for being too hinduwana and unislamic for pakistan.
 
Its complicated !

The Muhammad Bin Qasim part is true but it should be understand in the context in which Jinnah used it to be instead of looked on with such ignorant incredulousness that one doesn't understand what was meant with that !

At any rate I don't see anything wrong with claiming Pakistan's Pre-Islamic past because after all the Pashtuns, Baluch, Punjabis, Saraikis, Sindhis & Kashmiris have been living here for thousands of years & the past, if it must belong to someone, belongs to them not someone sitting in Madras or Bombay.

The rest is something I've never read myself so I can comment; maybe in some other Local Board they teach that but not where I was studying & my Pakistan Studies books were Ministry Approved.

Not really buddy these were the texts derived from the Pakistani Studies Textbooks which I suppose is part of your national curriculum not any local one.....

The content of Pakistan's official textbooks has often been criticized by several sources including many within Pakistan for sometimes promoting religious intolerance and Indophobia, leading to calls for curriculum reform. (but in rare cases)

According to Hussain Haqqani, only officially published textbooks are used in Pakistan's schools and colleges since the era of Ayub Khan. This is used by Pakistani government to create a standard narrative of Pakistan's history. During the rule of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq a program of Islamization of the country including the textbooks was started. General Zia's 1979 education policy stated that "[the] highest priority would be given to the revision of the curricula with a view to reorganizing the entire content around Islamic thought and giving education an ideological orientation so that Islamic ideology permeates the thinking of the younger generation and helps them with the necessary conviction and ability to refashion society according to Islamic tenets".
According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, since the 1970s Pakistani school textbooks have systematically inculcated hatred towards India and Hindus through historical revisionism. There is no mention of Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus. Many texts give an impression that ancient Indian heritage was not destroyed by Afghans and Turks but Muslim heritage was destroyed by Indians, which is a contradiction of the theory of international historians.

May be right now they have been removed from the same (If not then the officials should serious consider removing the same) but those facts and texts that I just listed were from Wikipedia, and some of you reputed dailies such as the Tribune and the Dawn....

Sorry my post count is still below 30 that's why I am not able attach the links but you can Google the same keywords and you will get to known those credible sources from where I have taken such texts....
 
Funny pakistanis want to claim IVC and ancient hindu and buddist culture of the region as ancint pakistan history , at the same time would have none of it in their own lives , e,g Baisakhi celebration has been part punjabi culture since time immemorial now discarded for being too hinduwana and unislamic for pakistan.

Funny, how Indus vally is not even located in India, but its mainly in Pakistan. It is our historical heritage. Not yours. Please stop stealing other people's stuff. I know you are jealous of us, but this is real low.
 
Not really buddy these were the texts derived from the Pakistani Studies Textbooks which I suppose is part of your national curriculum not any local one.....

The content of Pakistan's official textbooks has often been criticized by several sources including many within Pakistan for sometimes promoting religious intolerance and Indophobia, leading to calls for curriculum reform. (but in rare cases)

According to Hussain Haqqani, only officially published textbooks are used in Pakistan's schools and colleges since the era of Ayub Khan. This is used by Pakistani government to create a standard narrative of Pakistan's history. During the rule of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq a program of Islamization of the country including the textbooks was started. General Zia's 1979 education policy stated that "[the] highest priority would be given to the revision of the curricula with a view to reorganizing the entire content around Islamic thought and giving education an ideological orientation so that Islamic ideology permeates the thinking of the younger generation and helps them with the necessary conviction and ability to refashion society according to Islamic tenets".
According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, since the 1970s Pakistani school textbooks have systematically inculcated hatred towards India and Hindus through historical revisionism. There is no mention of Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus. Many texts give an impression that ancient Indian heritage was not destroyed by Afghans and Turks but Muslim heritage was destroyed by Indians, which is a contradiction of the theory of international historians.

May be right now they have been removed from the same (If not then the officials should serious consider removing the same) but those facts and texts that I just listed were from Wikipedia, and some of you reputed dailies suchas the Tribune and the Dawn....

Sorry my post count is still below 30 that's why I am not able attach the links but you can Google the same keywords and you will get to known those credible sources from where I have taken such texts....

Lol. Indian are criticizing our history taught in schools, while Indian governments brain washes their children in to believing, India borders Afghanistan. Lol.shows the height of delusion and lies. Indian government can not even accept its geography as reality. Lol they can not even get their present right, what can be said about their nut job history...lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom