What's new

Wrong Facts on Chanakya

Status
Not open for further replies.
cant you see in the map open your eyes man :hitwall: the border is ending near current pakistan's eastren border
 
.
one correction buddy...Dhana Nanda wasn't the ruler of India..he was ruler of Magadha..and there was similar powerful empires in India at that time..eg..Gangaridai empire(Bengal) and Kalinga(orissa)...its the coalition of Magadha and Gangaridai empire and their fortification on the banks of Ganga and massive coalition army which Alexander feared..history writers only mentions Magadha,not Gangaridai empire..

see this map...

800px-Asia_323bc.jpg


You are correct Maghadha empire was much smaller under Dhana Nanada compared to what it became during
Mourya dynasty . Odisha was independent and came under the Mourya empire when Ashoka invaded it.

First of all their was nothing such as India before 1947, secondly since chanakya was born in Texila (modern day pakistan), why do you feel so much pain ?

.



Ask yourself do u think Chanakya was part of pakistan ideology ?? LOL.
 
. .
***** Please!!!! The Chanakya Guy is here....

First of all their was nothing such as India before 1947, secondly since chanakya was born in Texila (modern day pakistan), why do you feel so much pain ?

Seems like many of the Pakistanis are still obsessed with the BS texts of their crap Pakistani Studies Textbooks which turns their young scholars to merely A$$holes....

The content of Pakistan's official textbooks has often been criticized by several sources including many within Pakistan for sometimes promoting religious intolerance and Indophobia...And the result is not far to seek as many comments posted by our Paksitani Friends just depict the same...

A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'." :cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo: Jalal points out that even an acclaimed scholar like Jameel Jalibi questions the validity of a national history that seeks to "claim Pakistan's pre-Islamic past" in an attempt to compete with India's historic antiquity. K. Ali's two volume history designed for BA students traces the pre-history of the 'Indo-Pakistan' subcontinent to the Paleolithic Age and consistently refers to the post-1947 frontiers of Pakistan while discussing the Dravidians and the Aryans.:omghaha::omghaha:

An editorial in Pakistan's oldest newspaper Dawn commenting on a report in The Guardian on Pakistani Textbooks noted 'By propagating concepts such as jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, India’s ingrained enmity with Pakistan, etc., the textbook board publications used by all government schools promote a mindset that is bigoted and obscurantist. Since there are more children studying in these schools than in madrassahs the damage done is greater.

Only keyboard hindu warriors can invent such stupid things, since pakistani havn't achieve that degree of stupidity, thanks God.

Oh Yeah, Paksitani has never achieved anything in history as such or what to achieve when they are born that way^^^Stupidity flows in blood^^^....
 
.
Khabarnaak on Geo News

If having problem in watching the video , Google Khabarnaak on Geo News – 26th July 2013 Episode

Stupid pakistani anchor abusing indian icon chanakya that too on the basis of blatantly wrong historical facts.

When Alexander attacked India and fought with king Purus of north west Punjab , India was ruled by the king Dhana Nanda , not by Chandra gupta Mourya by whose prime minister was chanakya .

At the time of Alexander's attack , chanakya was simple teacher at Taksila whose efforts brought small and big kingdoms of north india together whose combined might discouraged Alexander to invade beyond Purus kingdom .
Chanakya was not a Brahmin according to where I read. Any other teacher of that time(apparently the other guy in the show) is more likely to be one. So how can a Brahmin complain against his treatment in society?!! Also the anchor alleges that Chanakya poisoned Porus. Never heard of this stuff before. Anyone else did?

And the anchor says Machiavelli is a gaali. Someone give him 'The Prince'. Pakistan will be lucky to have a Machiavelli. Machiavelli and Prince wrote to their generation. They were gems of their time. It is only for people like this anchor to dig out age old outdated ideas and dance on them. I guess it is the same syndrome that makes the religious Pakistanis to demand that women should be 'respected' by making them sit at home.

But the comedy of the show was good. The timing of the Chanakya was spot on. :D
 
.
Some Pakistanis think that Alexander was sikandar, a Muslim. He might have interpreted it a defeat of Islam in the Hand of Hindus. He may not be aware of the fact that Alexander invade India 800 years before Islam came into existent.

Have you ever met a single Pakistani in your whole miserable life?
 
.
Some Pakistanis think that Alexander was sikandar, a Muslim. He might have interpreted it a defeat of Islam in the Hand of Hindus. He may not be aware of the fact that Alexander invade India 800 years before Islam came into existent.


Ignorant Indian "Sikander" is the local name of Alexander, it doesn't mean people believe he was Muslim.
 
. .
Chanakya was not a Brahmin according to where I read. Any other teacher of that time(apparently the other guy in the show) is more likely to be one. So how can a Brahmin complain against his treatment in society?!! Also the anchor alleges that Chanakya poisoned Porus. Never heard of this stuff before. Anyone else did?

And the anchor says Machiavelli is a gaali. Someone give him 'The Prince'. Pakistan will be lucky to have a Machiavelli. Machiavelli and Prince wrote to their generation. They were gems of their time. It is only for people like this anchor to dig out age old outdated ideas and dance on them. I guess it is the same syndrome that makes the religious Pakistanis to demand that women should be 'respected' by making them sit at home.

But the comedy of the show was good. The timing of the Chanakya was spot on. :D

Such Pakistani shows are to target India and promote religious intolerance and indophobia only..not the first reported case....
 
.
I think Pakistan seriously take the fact that "History is written by people"....apparently it seems that they always fails to identify the one who should write the history in Pakistan and everybody wants to become the person who writes History in Pakistan
 
. . .
To all the Pakistanis, During Alexander invasion. There was only a combination of Hindu kingdoms at that time. We don't give a $#!t about today's border. You were given that land only because a majority of Muslims were living there during partition, You just cannot claim the History of that land yours alone, It belongs equally to Hindustanis also.
You yourself admit that you are half-arabs. Acc to me You guys are nothing more than mere settlers who had a strong Military in those days. Since you are staying there doesn't make the history of that land yours. Any History of that time also belongs to Hindus around the world and the current citizens of India.
 
.
What's with the obsession with Chanakya, BD's and Pak's seems to discuss more about him than Indians :what:
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom