below_freezing
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't really get what you mean by "USA Attack on Islamic World". Besides the fact that Sierra Leonne doesn't give a **** about attack on Libya and neither does Gambia give a **** about an attack on Tajikistan; Iran and Pakistan are the only main players who can possibly ever be engaged in any military conflict. The rest are dead sheep, neutral or allied. Central Asia can become a problem in a worst case scenario but it is unrealizable as of now.
I don't see a World War III happening in any scenario. Beyond a couple of small scale wars (relative to WW I and II), there aren't any big geo-political battles that can possibly be settled in the battlegrounds anymore.
There are definitely problems that can be solved by a war. however their distribution has changed. i read an article saying something about the world being divided into cores and peripheries, with zones of conflict primarily centered on africa, middle east and latin america. other than cold war territorial battles like china vs. USA over taiwan or north korea vs south korea, almost all potential conflicts should occur in the unstable parts of the world.