What's new

World War II: 'India should claim its role in victory of Allied forces'

LOVETOALL

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
New Delhi, Oct 31 (ANI): Lt General JFR Jacob (retd.), who is known for the role he played in India's victory in the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971 and the Liberation of Bangladesh, has said that mobility was, is and will be the prime principle of war.

He was speaking at the book launch of eight volumes of 'Official History of Indian Armed Forces In The Second World War 1939-45' at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA).

Recalling the lessons learnt from World War II, Lt Gen Jacob insisted that the role of heavy guns and artillery remain relevant even today. "The role of artillery should not be confined to neutralisation, rather it should be destruction of the enemy," he said.

The book release was followed by a panel discussion, chaired by Lt General Satish Nambiar, who asserted that the contribution of Indian Armed forces during the Second World War has largely gone unnoticed.

The confusion among the ranks of the nationalist movement leaders on the issue of India's participation in the war resulted in poor negotiation when it came to distribution of spoils of war, following Indian soldiers' valiant display at the war, he stated.

The panellists commended the efforts of the publisher in bringing out the eight volumes on the history of Indian forces during the Second World War.

The Panellist also felt that as a rising power, India should create awareness about the tremendous role the Indian army played in the victory of the allied forces.

The volumes have been put together by the History Division of the Ministry of Defence in an attempt to bring to fore the contribution of the Indian forces, which has otherwise remained largely obscure.

The books also highlight how the war expedited the progress of India's Independence from British rule. They go on to describe how the Naval Mutiny and the strength of the professional Indian Army convinced the British that it was best to wisely exit from India in 1947.

The Indian Army's strength, when the war began in 1939, was about 200,000 men and by the end of the war in August 1945, it had become the largest volunteer army in history, rising to over 2.5 million men. These men serving in divisions of infantry, armour and a fledgling airborne force, fought on three continents in Africa, Europe and Asia.

The British appreciated the valour of Indian soldiers during the Second World War with the award of some 4,000 decorations. 29 Indian personnel were awarded the Victoria Cross (VC), while eight were awarded the George Cross (GC). (ANI)


World War II: 'India should claim its role in victory of Allied forces'
 
Claim its role..how ?

With what aim after 60 + years.

Why WW II , the role of the Armed Forces even after 1947 has gone unnoticed. The role is not limited to its acts during times of war but peace time too.
 
It's weird that on the one hand we have "India Gate" memorial in Delhi dedicated to WW I soldiers who gave their lives in the battlefield. But, the same Indian Govt.'s step motherly attitude towards its own soldiers (staggering 28 lakh Indian soldiers fought in WW II). Indian Govt. even refused to allow "Time Watch Commission" to film their documentary about Indian soldiers who fought at WW II. Why is this double standard???
 
Claim its role..how ?

With what aim after 60 + years.

Why WW II , the role of the Armed Forces even after 1947 has gone unnoticed. The role is not limited to its acts during times of war but peace time too.
Coz there are very little to show for india in military victory column.
 
Coz there are very little to show for india in military victory column.

India has whole new nation called Bangladesh in that victory column..... a feat surpassed by few .... every time you fell India has not achieved anything against pakistan...just take look at south asia map before trolling here
 
Japan never officially apologize for the bloody atrocity they did to whole Asian in WW2. **** it.

Japan never officially apologize for the bloody atrocity they did to whole Asian in WW2. **** it.
 
Why is everyone going on a tangent ?

He means that India , Pak & BD must seek their share of glory in their contribution towards willing WWII
 
Coz there are very little to show for india in military victory column.

First Indo-Pak war, 1947
Second Indo-Pak war, 1965
Third Indo-Pak war, 1971
Operation Polo, 1948
Siachen war, 1984
Kargil war, 1999, Operation VIJAY

Why is everyone going on a tangent ?

He means that India , Pak & BD must seek their share of glory in their contribution towards willing WWII

For forget for Pakistani, their is nothing before 1947.......
 
First Indo-Pak war, 1947
Second Indo-Pak war, 1965
Third Indo-Pak war, 1971
Operation Polo, 1948
Siachen war, 1984
Kargil war, 1999, Operation VIJAY



For forget for Pakistani, their is nothing before 1947.......

Since you are adding Op Polo, pls add the liberation of Goa 1961 as well.
 
Japan never officially apologize for the bloody atrocity they did to whole Asian in WW2. **** it.

Japan never officially apologize for the bloody atrocity they did to whole Asian in WW2. **** it.

True. The sheer brutality by Japanese soldiers on captured Indian soldiers at WW II is outrageous. The Japanese soldiers used to do "target practice" on captured Indian soldiers. And those still alive after "target practice" session were brutally murdered by Bayonet.

large.jpg

Japanese Soldiers murdering captured Indian Soldiers during their "Target Practice" session in WW II on 1942.
 
Coz there are very little to show for india in military victory column.

itne jaldi bhool gaye ? wapas nautanki kari toh '71 ki tarah kaat ke rakh denge samjhe ? Bilkul beech mein se !! :lol:

Oh yeh? How could India claim victory even not independent back then WW2?

FYI, China became strictly independent only after 1998 when Britishers left Hong Kong. What a pity.. MEGATON FARTS couldn't do jack to a minute island country :woot:
 
Back
Top Bottom