What's new

World Food Day 2022: India Tops Hunger Charts in South Asia

98% of those dying due to starvation are OBC SC ST.
Upper caste of India and upper caste parties like BJP/RSS are spreading propaganda through all their media to confuse common people, about hunger index.
Why Brahman Janta Party BJP/RSS is spreading so much propaganda and hair splitting to counter hunger index ? Because if these facts are established then it will have to dealt with, means money and resources will be spend on OBC SC ST, Less money and resources for Brahmans and Baniyas to hog.
 
.
Pakistan has just suffered unprecedented floods. And India is under the rule of Modi, the best prime minister in history.

However, Pakistan won.
There are no winners or losers because it is not a race. No man or child has to go hungery . It is time to pledge for no more hunger and world has to come together to make it happen.
 
.
The title of the UNDP paper is "Unpacking Deprivation Bundle". Below is an excerpt from it:

"The analysis first looks at the most common deprivation profiles across 111 developing countries (figure 1). The most common profile, affecting 3.9 percent of poor people, includes deprivations in exactly four indicators: nutrition, cooking fuel, sanitation and housing.7 More than 45.5 million poor people are deprived in only these four indicators.8 Of those people, 34.4 million live in India, 2.1 million in Bangladesh and 1.9 million in Pakistan—making this a predominantly South Asian profile "


Also note in this UNDP report that the income poverty (people living on $1.90 or less per day) in Pakistan is 3.6% while it is 22.5% in India and 14.3% in Bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
.
Be careful, bhakts used to have the same exact keywords/phrases- 10 years of Modi rule will fix everything, 70 years of corrupt congress rule did this and that, its 10 years now and look at the state. Imran Khan sounds like our very own Feku and PTI guys are the bhakts of Pakistan. Since 10 year rule didn't fix anything, slogans have now changed to 20 years.
both are exactly the same. nothing but jumlabazi.

modi: Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas

khan: main in choroon ko nahin chhoroo ga (then proceeds on to let them all go to England for ilaaj and/or teemaardari. says merai mathay lag jai ga agar mar gia. right from the outset lets many crooks from other parties into PTI and gives them all high positions at the expense of PTIans. makes infamous betrayer from scotland sarwar governor of Punjab against all advice not to mention one time qatil buzdar as CM. frees multiple times qatil and druglord sana ullah).
 
.
both are exactly the same. nothing but jumlabazi.

modi: Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas

khan: main in choroon ko nahin chhoroo ga (then proceeds on to let them all go to England for ilaaj and/or teemaardari. says merai mathay lag jai ga agar mar gia. right from the outset lets many crooks from other parties into PTI and gives them all high positions at the expense of PTIans. makes infamous betrayer from scotland sarwar governor of Punjab against all advice not to mention one time qatil buzdar as CM. frees multiple times qatil and druglord sana ullah).
There are some strong parallels between their followers too. :D
 
.
@RiazHaq

Brofessor sb,

Also note in this UNDP report that the income poverty (people living on $1.90 or less per day) in Pakistan is 3.6% while it is 22.5% in India and 14.3% in Bangladesh.

I suppose this is more than offset by the fact that the governments in IND and BD provide a lot of subsidies (freebies or revadis as they are popularly known as) by way of free food, subsidised electricty, gas etc As a result on net basis, India with a score of 0.069 and BD with 0.104 are much better off than PAK 01.98.

Regards
 
.
1666024218514.png


What is Pakistan's national poverty line? Evidently it is of higher standard than $1.9 PPP a day. :cheers:
 
.
One thing I've wondered is whether the report is not fair to South Asia in general. Warmer climate means that less calories are consumed compared with nations in the north, and I wonder if that is taken into account by the report.
 
. .
The Centre’s rejection of India's latest GHI ranking does not obscure the challenge we face.


For the second year in a row, India’s government has rejected the Global Hunger Index (GHI) ranking published by two international organizations: Concern Worldwide, an aid agency, and Welthun-gerhilfe, a non-profit entity, based, respectively, in Ireland and Germany. Their annual GHI report, which is peer reviewed, has been published for the past 17 years. India was ranked No. 107 out of 122 countries, below Bangladesh (at No. 84), Nepal (81), Pakistan (99) and Sri Lanka (64). Last year, India was No. 101 out of 116 countries. The government’s petulance stems from two reasons. One is that three of the four metrics forming the index use malnutrition data on children, i.e. wasting, stunting and premature mortality. Only one of the four metrics is on malnourishment, not malnutrition, and not even hunger. So how can the index based mainly on data for children be representative of the entire population? The second objection is about the sample size, which is 3,000. That is too low and not representative, according to the government. Some in government have even attributed mala fide intent to the publishers, who they say are more keen to taint India’s image than publish objective statistics. This is unfortunately becoming a routine ploy of discrediting adverse reports by either blaming the messenger or mongering conspiracy. This certainly won’t help, and India seems to be the only country upset about the GHI scores.

----------------------------------------------------------

The title of the UNDP paper on Multidimensional Poverty is "Unpacking Deprivation Bundle". Below is an excerpt from it:

"The analysis first looks at the most common deprivation profiles across 111 developing countries (figure 1). The most common profile, affecting 3.9 percent of poor people, includes deprivations in exactly four indicators: nutrition, cooking fuel, sanitation and housing.7 More than 45.5 million poor people are deprived in only these four indicators.8 Of those people, 34.4 million live in India, 2.1 million in Bangladesh and 1.9 million in Pakistan—making this a predominantly South Asian profile "



Also note in this UNDP report that the income poverty (people living on $1.90 or less per day) in Pakistan is 3.6% while it is 22.5% in India and 14.3% in Bangladesh.
 
.
Why Are Some Countries Happier Than Others




To ponder the question of happiness and happy countries, one can start with the World Happiness Index.

A quick perusal identifies several Scandinavian countries at the top (with Finland leading) and others also with high per capita GDP. Yet that alone is not sufficient for one also encounters anomalies. For example, India’s is higher than for Pakistan, but the latter is listed 66 in the index while India is almost hugging the bottom at 144. Moreover, the other major country in the subcontinent, Bangladesh, for all its turbulent history is still at 107 way ahead of India.

Other anomalies are South Korea and Japan at 62 and 63, far down the list from the other rich countries. Perhaps the cause here is a work ethic and social norms that informally require long hours at work coupled with expected socializing thereafter with colleagues.

Then there is the issue of inequality. One can indeed try to assess the impact of economic inequality through its measure, the Gini Coefficient expressed from 0 to 1. Sometimes it is written in percent terms as a number from 0 to 100 and it is then referred to as the Gini Index.

It matters little to the black South African that he earns more than other sub-Saharan Africans; what matters to him is his income in relation to others in South African society. It was an underlying cause of the riots last year in addition to the jailing of former president Jacob Zuma. The World Bank has named South Africa the most unequal country in the world.

Income inequality in the US has been on the rise since the 1970s when neo-liberalism in the Democratic party undermined the progressive taxes and regulations helping to bolster the middle class as well as safety nets for the poor. Who can forget how welfare was going to be replaced by ‘workfare’ and the stories, legion in the media, about families sitting at home getting ‘rich’ on welfare checks.

Yes, the rich got richer sheltering their money from taxes in the Cayman Islands or the Bahamas or the Isle of Man. Yet at the expense of the poor and the middle class with two-job families becoming the norm, and children in after-school programs because Mom wasn’t there to pick them up.

The World happiness Index summarizes what the neo-liberals achieved: the US is at the bottom of industrialized countries in North America and Europe. Of course an absence of a national health insurance program makes matters worse — it adds to worry, the antithesis of happiness.

An absence of worry, an absence of vast differences in income, social cohesion and a presence of a suitable safety net for when things go wrong. These appear to be the common denominators for happy countries.

And why not a Gross National Happiness (GNH) measure, as in Bhutan, in addition to the GDP. It is a philosophy that guides Bhutan.
 
.
@RiazHaq

Brofessor sb,

one can start with the World Happiness Index.

You were the one who introduced us hapless Indians to the beauty and inclusiveness of the Multidimensional Poverty Index on chowk, Musings and PDF. Now, I guess that there is little chance of Pakistan ever catching up with IND or BD on MPI, presumably you will shift to farji indices like Happiness Index?

Regards
 
.
@RiazHaq Brofessor Saab claims to be an analyst.
Any analyst worth his/her salt would analyse a subject with objectivity and without any bias.

But our dear Brofessor seems to analyse everything with an anti India bias. If a report comes out then he makes an effort to bring out only those aspects that show India in bad light. Rather than comparing and showing who stands where, his focus is only on how bad India is. If Pakistan is worse then that can remain hidden.

Probably that’s the difference between a real professor and a Brofessor.
Only value he has managed to earn for himself though his lopsided views is entertainment value.

Aaiye Brofessor sahab, kuch bataiye hum subko India ki buri cheezon ke bare mein.
 
.
@VkdIndian

I think the previous post is an unfair assessment of Brofessor sb. He has his angularity for sure- we all have- but he is a top notch data analyst. Over the course of my 15 years of interaction with him over several fora- Chowk, PTH, PDF and Musings, I have immensely learned from him nuances of analysis and finer points of development economics,

Regards
 
.
@RiazHaq

Brofessor sb,

one can start with the World Happiness Index.

You were the one who introduced us hapless Indians to the beauty and inclusiveness of the Multidimensional Poverty Index on chowk, Musings and PDF. Now, I guess that there is little chance of Pakistan ever catching up with IND or BD on MPI, presumably you will shift to farji indices like Happiness Index?

Regards

farji indices like Happiness Index" ? Not if you look at the declining labor participation rate (LPR) in India!

Both male and female LPR in India is now lower than in Pakistan...it at least partly explains India's low ranking on Happiness Index.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom