Will India ever be a "real" super-power?

[Iggy]

Are you educated in history? Japan never owned China, like British owned India. Japan invaded, we still hold 2/3 of our land, and the battle was on going. .

You should thank big daddy for helping you in time and why should British own you when you are ready to obey her all commands like giving Hong Kong to British and cultivate opium for them.. You are like a free slave for them and a very obedient one too working on the wish of the masters..

Bharat is not any academic history book, China is. PRC refers to communist party which came to power in 1949. Before the communist, it was KMT in power, they are political party, China was always there. The same cannot be said about India, you never had one overall emperor, most of your history you were different kingdoms. Even after British left, they created hundreds of princely states. WHy is it so hard for indian to accept the real history? I'm not trolling. Go read any history book of SOuth Asia.

We dont expect anything about Bharat in your PRC history books.. You are taking pride in different dynaties spread all over.. There was no China mate..

 

[INDIC]

LOL, bhrarat is a concept, bharat is mythology. It never existed in reality. You cannot have many kings and call yourself one country, can you?

Emperor Bharat or Bharata is mythology, the concept of Bhāratvarsha(Bhārat=India, Varsha=country) was a real concept of considering as a one people, one civilization.

 

[Iggy]

Calling Qin Dynasty as China..How these people are fed with misinformation

 

[INDIC]

Calling Qin Dynasty as China..How these people are fed with misinformation

Does the word 'Middle Kingdom'(Zhongguo) sounds like a name of a country.

 

[Fattyacids]

You should thank big daddy for helping you in time and why should British own you when you are ready to obey her all commands like giving Hong Kong to British and cultivate opium for them.. You are like a free slave for them and a very obedient one too working on the wish of the masters..

LOL, British didn't colonize us, they took a few port city. British certainly made you slaves for 200 years
Even your constitution is written in English. British literally created India from nothing. You went from slaves to free men depending on caste of course. That's not the same as Chinese in China.

We dont expect anything about Bharat in your PRC history books.. You are taking pride in different dynaties spread all over.. There was no China mate..

All historians said there was China. Why not go sue them?

 

[Fattyacids]

Emperor Bharat or Bharata is mythology, the concept of Bhāratvarsha(Bhārat=India, Varsha=country) was a real concept of considering as a one people, one civilization.

The concept of Bharatvarsah is a concept, because there was no country by such name. At best, it denotes a geographic area.
The people share similar religion and culture in this area known academically as indian subcontinent but they were never same people. ASI is totally different from as ANI. There's also Aryan migration into the land.

 

[INDIC]

Do not confused us with Indian, you were united by British. British created your country.

Says who, who's own modern country was liberated and gift by America, Britain and USSR.

Sovereignty of country is NOT defined by land size or ethnic group

That sounds bizarre. The land and the people living there together makes a nation. China of 220BC just looks like a province inside modern China.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

Goodness, not that again. We had this debate just a few weeks ago. According to some dimwit Indian the USA was not a unified country until Hawaii was annexed into US territory not to speak of the western part of the US and Alaska. Or Germany is no more a unified countra since we lost huge chunks of territory in Eastern Prussia, Pomerania, Alsace and Lorrain after WWII, not to speak of the time when the current Germany was divided in East and West.

 

[Fattyacids]

Says who, who's own modern country was liberated and gift by America, Britain and USSR.

LOL, we fought japs ourselves on our land. Whereas you were fighting for the Queen of England

That sounds bizarre. The land and the people living there together makes a nation. China of 220BC just looks like a province inside modern China.

LOL, it's bizarre because you posted a wrong map. Qin includes xinjiang and vietnam. Honesty is not your forte isn'it?

 

[INDIC]

The concept of Bharatvarsah is a concept, because there was no country by such name. At best, it denotes a geographic area.
The people share similar religion and culture in this area known academically as indian subcontinent but they were never same people. ASI is totally different from as ANI. There's also Aryan migration into the land.

Both Indian and foreigners call us Indians a common people with names Bhārat and India/Hind/Hindustan respectively. Nation state only came recently, a united China under one central government only in 1950.

Calling Qin Empire a united country sounds bizarre.

 

[Iggy]

LOL, British didn't colonize us, they took a few port city. British certainly made you slaves for 200 years
Even your constitution is written in English. British literally created India from nothing. You went from slaves to free men depending on caste of course. That's not the same as Chinese in China.

As I said, they do not want to colonize you, you were already ready to serve the master doing whatever they want you to do.. You were very obedient to them and will obey what ever they commands you

All historians said there was China. Why not go sue them?

So was the name India from the Socrates period.. You go and sue Socrates then

 

[Iggy]

Goodness, not that again. We had this debate just a few weeks ago. According to some dimwit Indian the USA was not a unified country until Hawaii was annexed into US territory not to speak of the western part of the US and Alaska. Or Germany is no more a unified countra since we lost huge chunks of territory in Eastern Prussia, Pomerania, Alsace and Lorrain after WWII, not to speak of the time when the current Germany was divided in East and West.

So essentially you agree that India was there before 1947 right? before Mughals or Britishers came ?

 

[Fattyacids]

Both Indian and foreigners call us Indians a common people with names Bhārat and India/Hind/Hindustan respectively. Nation state only came recently, a united China under one central government only in 1950.

Calling Qin Empire a united country sounds bizarre. :

South indian doesn't look a bit like north indian. Who are you trying to fool?

Is it bizarre because you're jealous of China and its proud history.

 

[INDIC]

As I said, they do not want to colonize you, you were already ready to serve the master doing whatever they want you to do.. You were very obedient to them and will obey what ever they commands you



So was the name India from the Socrates period.. You go and sue Socrates then

Chinese emperors gave Europeans permission to ruin Chinese people by flooding opium and make money, why would Europeans ever needed to conquer China.

 

[Iggy]

South indian doesn't look a bit like north indian. Who are you trying to fool?

Is it bizarre because you're jealous of China and its proud history.

Huh?? What kind of idiotic nonsense are you talking? What is look has to do with nationality??