why was Sindh not "partitioned"??

[Areesh]

Yeah because that generation is dead.
Or do you want me to name the famous ones?

I can also quote a few famous ones. So that doesn't matter. A huge number still lives in Karachi. They have whole colonies with them. So I don't need to see if 3-4 guys went back. Good for them too.

 

[Levina]

I can also quote a few famous ones. So that doesn't matter. A huge number still lives in Karachi. They have whole colonies with them. So I don't need to see if 3-4 guys went back. Good for them too.

For once, I'm glad that the extremists left India.

 

[Areesh]

Why would one accept a ruler signing a deal in Baluchistan? That's not democratic for Pakistanis, as they blame India for Kashmir.

If the Hindus of Sindh didn't want to merge with Pakistan, why there was no referendum? Who gave leaders the rights to sign it?

The ruler of Kalat was not involve in murdering its people to join Pakistan. Nor was the case in Sindh. People of Jammu already revolted against the Kashmir raja which isn't the case with Baluchistan or Sindh.

Ps: You guys really s*ck at history.

For once, I'm glad that the extremists left India.

They are also happy that they don't live with the hindorhas.

PS: Hindorhas is a derogatory term for Hindus that many guys who migrated from India say about hindus. No offense.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

At the time of Partition in 1947, the Hindu population of Pakistan was estimated at approximately a quarter of the total population. For example, the population of Karachi, Pakistan in 1947 was 450,000, of which 51% was Hindu, and 42% was Muslim. By 1951, Karachi�s population had increased to 1.137 million because of the influx of 600,000 Muslim refugees from India. In 1951, the Muslim population of Karachi was 96% and the Hindu population was 2%.[lx

Here is an indian source... reguardin the percentage of hindus or minorities in Pak... :

Now post a link proving your claim about karachi being a majority hindu city.

For once, I'm glad that the extremists left India.

Guess what... indian minorities are getting a "banana" as we speak.

 

[Screambowl]

The ruler of Kalat was not involve in murdering its people to join Pakistan. Nor was the case in Sindh. People of Jammu already revolted against the Kashmir raja which isn't the case with Baluchistan or Sindh.

Ps: You guys really s*ck at history.



They are also happy that they don't live with the hindorhas.

In that case the revolt of BLA must be recognized too, isn't it?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

PS: Hindorhas is a derogatory term for Hindus that many guys who migrated from India say about hindus. No offense.

None taken. This is nothing.

 

[Areesh]

In that case the revolt of BLA must be recognized too, isn't it?

BLA came years after the singing of accession. At the time of signature 99% of the population was with the Khan of Kalat. Then ULFA and all the secessionist movements of North East should also be recognized.

The fact is Kashmir, and Sindh/Baluchistan are far too different cases. No matter what you say.

 

[Levina]

They are also happy that they don't live with the hindorhas.

PS: Hindorhas is a derogatory term for Hindus that many guys who migrated from India say about hindus. No offense.

Fortunately for you I was taught not to use derogatory words. So you're spared.

And some well-meaning Hindus who want Pak and India to unite, 've no idea how utterly insulting this suggestion seems to Pakistanis like you, because for Pakistan independence Day means independence from Hindu and British dominance.
Unity is a word that evades such ppl.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Fortunately for you I was taught not to use derogatory words. So you're spared.

And some well-meaning Hindus who want Pak and India to unite, 've no idea how utterly insulting this suggestion seems to Pakistanis like you, because for Pakistan independence Day means independence from Hindu and British dominance.
Unity is a word that evades such ppl.

You can take united and shove it ... in your pursue.

BLA came years after the singing of accession. At the time of signature 99% of the population was with the Khan of Kalat. Then ULFA and all the secessionist movements of North East should also be recognized.

The fact is Kashmir, and Sindh/Baluchistan are far too different cases. No matter what you say.

you are replying to a ...... (fill in the "...i")

 

[Areesh]

Fortunately for you I was taught not to use derogatory words. So you're spared.

And some well-meaning Hindus who want Pak and India to unite, 've no idea how utterly insulting this suggestion seems to Pakistanis like you, because for Pakistan independence Day means independence from Hindu and British dominance.
Unity is a word that evades such ppl.

It was not me who uses such words. It is the guys who came here from India. They used to say such kind of things for Hindus. I told you what I heard.You simply have no idea the influence the guys who migrated from India have on Karachi. The largest city of Pakistan.

As for unification obviously that is a pipe dream and is not possible.

 

[Areesh]

you are replying to a ...... (fill in the "...i")

Yeah I know. Was just giving a lecture on history or else most Indians believe that K2 the second highest mountain in the world is in India.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

In your keister!!!

Is that a german term for " i love your .... manly personality" ?



Coz sorry i dont date ugly indian aunties..

Yeah I know. Was just giving a lecture on history or else most Indians believe that K2 the second highest mountain in the world is in India.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

u r a troduc and will remain so forever.

thats what you said last time honey.

 

[Levina]

thats what you said last time honey.

Unfortunately u have not improved one bit.

 

[Screambowl]

BLA came years after the singing of accession. At the time of signature 99% of the population was with the Khan of Kalat. Then ULFA and all the secessionist movements of North East should also be recognized.

The fact is Kashmir, and Sindh/Baluchistan are far too different cases. No matter what you say.

ISI does recognize them! That's why you fund them. Similary, you agree that BLA must be given freedom of speech according to the Pakistan's constitution. But you declared them terrorists. Very wrong.