why was Sindh not "partitioned"??

[Screambowl]

Baluchistan is also internal matter of Pakistan, why India is so curious that they started funding them?

Proof?

The difference is. India has no proof of Pakistani involvement while Pakistan has loads of proof for India's involvement in supporting terror.



Yup. Now I hope you understand too.

No I failed to understand when even USA says and asked Pakistan not to carry out any attack during Obama visit. lol

 

[Areesh]

Proof?

India is financing terrorist activities in Pakistan, accuses Musharraf

Attacks from Afghan soil have Indian involvement: Sartaj Aziz | Page 2

No I failed to understand when even USA says and asked Pakistan not to carry out any attack during Obama visit. lol

Can you please show me this "warning" from US media.

 

[Screambowl]

India is financing terrorist activities in Pakistan, accuses Musharraf

Attacks from Afghan soil have Indian involvement: Sartaj Aziz | Page 2



Can you please show me this "warning" from US media.

Accusations are Not a proof in court of Law!

Proofs are sent as documents called as 'Dossiers', Which India had sent 1001 times to Pakistan! Any dossier coming from Pakistanis side blaming India?

Can you please show me this "warning" from US media.

Barack Obama warns Pakistan: Shut down terrorist safe havens - Telegraph

Not US media but UK media neutral one is always better

 

[Areesh]

Accusations are Not a proof in court of Law!

Same for Indian "proofs"

Proofs are sent as documents called as 'Dossiers', Which India had sent 1001 times to Pakistan!

Accusation sent in the form of dossiers are also not a proof in court of law.

Any dossier coming from Pakistanis side blaming India?

My ex President and present NSA is saying about India's involvement. I believe in them.

 

[Screambowl]

Same for Indian "proofs"



Accusation sent in the form of dossiers are also not a proof in court of law.

If they were accusations, there wasn't any need to ban JuD. Involvement of stateless Pakistani in Mumbai, is also an acquisition only? .. haha, when Rehman Malik said yes Kasab is Pakistani! Please believe him also

My ex President and present NSA is saying about India's involvement. I believe in them.

And I believe Mines

 

[Areesh]

If they were accusations, there wasn't any need to ban JuD. Involvement of stateless Pakistani in Mumbai, is also an acquisition only? .

JuD isn't even properly practically and is still oerational. Hafiz Saeed has been acquitted by the courts. Your accusation weren't prove to be a court of law.

haha, when Rehman Malik said yes Kasab is Pakistani! Please believe him also

I believe him. Kasab just like Col prohit was a non state actor.

And I believe Mines

Good for you.

 

[Levina]

Who are you replying to?

Most prolly you have that member on your ignore list and ergo you cant see his posts. I was replying back to desertfighter.

 

[Screambowl]

JuD isn't even properly banned. Hafiz Saeed has been acquitted by the courts. Your accusation weren't prove to be a court of law.

A terrorist state will never try a terrorist, That expected as the courts in Pakistan are in the hands of security agency. You didn't even learn your mistakes after APS

I believe him. Kasab just like Col prohit was a non state actor.
.

So if you believe him, then you should also find out flaws in your society what makes Pakistan a terrorist state?

There is a list of attacks carried out on India, by Pakistani sponsored elements, world knows Pakistan used Talibanis in Kashmir. And you end up discussing samhota lol...

ek samjhota kar diya toh col purhohit col purhoit, who is still in Jail unlike Khabeez sayed...

Pakistan jo 100 samjhote exp karta hai India mein.. what about that? lol

 

[Areesh]

A terrorist state will never try a terrorist, That expected as the courts in Pakistan are in the hands of security agency. You didn't even learn your mistakes after APS

Well that's what you believe. Far from truth and reality. Accusation are not a proof in court of law. I repeat.

So if you believe him, then you should also find out flaws in your society what makes Pakistan a terrorist state?

Same applies for your society that produces Col purohit and makes you a terrorist society.

There is a list of attacks carried out on India, by Pakistani sponsored elements, world knows Pakistan used Talibanis in Kashmir.

Again that's what you believe. An nobody here is interested in listening what you believe.

ek samjhota kar diya toh col purhohit col purhoit... Pakistan jo 100 samjhote exp karta hai India mein.. what about that? lol

Hum nai to kuch nahi kia. tum log jhootai ho. Jhoot bol rahai ho.

 

[Screambowl]

Well that's what you believe. Far from truth and reality. Accusation are not a proof in court of law. I repeat.

If you say satellite phones connected to Karachi, is an accusation, then you need to revise your knowledge on what are proofs an what are accusation. lol

Same applies for your society that produces Col purohit and makes you a terrorist society.

No it does not apply to us because Osama was found in Pakistan

Hum nai to kuch nahi kia. tum log jhootai ho. Jhoot bol rahai ho.

humney bhi Balochistan mein kuch nahi kiya.. it's a home grown insurgency

 

[Areesh]

If you say satellite phones connected to Karachi, is an accusation, then you need to revise your knowledge on what are proofs an what are accusation. lol

If you say accusation of satellite phones connetcting to Karachi is a proof in court of law then you need ot improve your knowledge about what is a proof.

No it does not apply to us because Osama was found in Pakistan

Doesn't prove anything. Or else US would have declared us terrorist state which it didn't.

humney bhi Balochistan mein kuch nahi kiya.. it's a home grown insurgency

Hum nai bhi Kashmir ya phr India main kuch nahi kia. Everything is home grown.

 

[Screambowl]

If you say accusation of satellite phones connetcting to Karachi is a proof in court of law then you need ot improve your knowledge about what is a proof.


Hum nai bhi Kashmir ya phr India main kuch nahi kia. Everything is home grown.

Wikipedia tell's us and US tell us that LeT was involved, if you are in a denial mode, that's your ignorance about your bckyard
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/22/w...-spy-data-but-an-uncompleted-puzzle.html?_r=0

 

[Areesh]

Wikipedia tell's us and US tell us that LeT was involved, if you are in a denial mode, that's your ignorance about your bckyard
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/22/w...-spy-data-but-an-uncompleted-puzzle.html?_r=0

Who cares what Wikipedia says. Even USA doesn't care.

 

[Screambowl]

Who cares what Wikipedia says. Even USA doesn't care.

But they care about NY times


how reliable your courts are
Pak court adjourns hearing on appeal against bail to Mumbai attack mastermind Lakhvi


and you are making random arguments..where as your government is submitting evidences of Lakhvi's role in Mumbai
Pakistan submits evidence against Lakhvi in Mumbai attack case - Livemint

 

[KingMamba]

Karachi was Hindu majority till 1946. As soon as the Partition was in the news the Hindus fled.

Karachi was only Hindu majority because Hindus came over for work from other parts of South Asia or else it was always Muslim majority.