What's new

Why the west laughs about Putins "threats" for sanctions against EU and USA

This is true, but one has to look at the statistical situation. Quantitatively, the United States is impeccably impressive. Imagine, a nation of some 320 million, with average per capital at $54,000.

Qatar, Luxembourg, Brunei et al, that's nice and all. But these nations have populations that do not exceed 10 million each. I mean, Brunei's population is only 700,000. That's the size of one small city in the United States.
^^,

Russia is a UNSC = P-5 nation with more nuke punch than the US.
They have to work with Russia, if not, Russia can start distributing nukes to rogue states....
Its give and take...

BTW, look here at the percentage in the blue box.....

pupi.png
 
.
Russia is a UNSC = P-5 nation with more nuke punch than the US.
They have to work with Russia, if not, Russia can start distributing nukes to rogue states....
Its give and take...

Definitely. But we weren't talking about nuclear stock piles. Or did I miss a subject sweep?

Thanks for the graph tho. Appreciate the added information.
 
.
Don't stop there, why don't you calculate for us the combined GDP for BRICs.

Then do a comparative analysis of combined GDP, per capita, and population with EU-US-Japan. Perform an ANOVA (analysis of variance) for us, so we can identify areas of key interest(s).

Spasebo.

why should i count india and brazil, brazil isnt anti american enough. You can see at polls that they hate russians and chinese, they only want into brics to get economic gain for themselves they cant be trusted at all. India still isnt clear what they are up to but since they have territorial dispute with china they cant be 100% anti american. Only china and russia can

and what is the gdp per capita? you can figure it out yoruself eu+japan+us has 1 billion people vs Russia & China who have 1.5 billion. So it means they have 36 thousand $ nominal gdp per capita and we have 8 thousand
 
.
why should i count india and brazil, brazil isnt anti american enough. You can see at polls that they hate russians and chinese, they only want into brics to get economic gain for themselves they cant be trusted at all. India still isnt clear what they are up to but since they have territorial dispute with china they cant be 100% anti american. Only china and russia can

and what is the gdp per capita? you can figure it out yoruself eu+japan+us has 1 billion people vs Russia & China who have 1.5 billion. So it means they have 36 thousand $ nominal gdp per capita and we have 8 thousand

The reason why I requested is because there have been talks in this thread about the uniformity of BRICs and the economic clout of this new group. So, I am asking to be elucidated upon by doing a multivariate analysis of EU-US-Japan and BRICS and specifically analyzing the following dependent variables :1) combined GDP, 2) Population , 3) Per Capita, and 4) Human Development Index. I am asking you to provide this because you've voiced your support of BRICs in more than one occasion and its apparent success.

So i am merely , as an academic, asking to illustrate this and substantiate these claims.

Thanks.
 
.
why should i count india and brazil, brazil isnt anti american enough. You can see at polls that they hate russians and chinese, they only want into brics to get economic gain for themselves they cant be trusted at all. India still isnt clear what they are up to but since they have territorial dispute with china they cant be 100% anti american. Only china and russia can

and what is the gdp per capita? you can figure it out yoruself eu+japan+us has 1 billion people vs Russia & China who have 1.5 billion. So it means they have 36 thousand $ nominal gdp per capita and we have 8 thousand

Yep, Russia and China now are totally in the same boat with everything on the stake, no any retreat.

If we can survive, then the world will belong to us.

The BRICS Bank was formed by the strong determination of these two countries. Otherwise, who will do that with the risk of getting bombed by the US?
 
.
Most of you spoke about GDP ,but in geopolitics most important are natural resources.
Everything depends on them and countries who possess them have big advantage for the future.
Most of wars are for natural resources not for human rights or something else....
 
.
Most of you spoke about GDP ,but in geopolitics most important are natural resources.
Everything depends on them and countries who possess them have big advantage for the future.
Most of wars are for natural resources not for human rights or something else....

That's why Russia is also the key player in the BRICS, its role is just as important as China's.

Its military is also the top notch in the world.
 
.
Rare minerals are important for many stages of industries and production.
Most of rare minerals possess China,Russia,India,Brazil also African countries...
If they make restriction of export of minerals, prices will go high on final products, so this is one little example how now we depend each of another in this global village.
 
.
It is called an Alliance System, my dear. It is the World Order.

US-EU-JAPAN = Combined GDP of $36 TRILLION.

The Combined Military Powers of said platforms is second to none.


You can add Australia,Canada to the alliance(as they are firm allies) and you got 39 trillion $...with South Korea it will round it up to a nice 40+ trillion.In fact,the numbers are bigger.

Plus;

EU 2014=18.4 trillion,US=17.5 trillion,Japan=5 trillion....some 41 trillion allready + Canada,Aus=44 trillion $...not to shabby

Btw,the "declining" EU has managed to add 1 trillion $ to its GDP in 2014 vis a vis 2013.

There are non EU countries who will immediately toe the same line if need be,like Norway,Switzerland and there you have 1.2 trillion $ more.That makes it 45 trillion +...and on,and on.
 
Last edited:
. .
Looking at the above map, for whom is war more profitable? A state that is highly indebted or a nation whose finance is sound? History will give us a good conclusion. Then we will also see who is the warmonger.
 
. . .
And Japan's GDP is $5 Trillion, yet with a population of only 128 million. ;)

In other words, with a population 1/10th of China....!


Come to China and find out. Japan lost some 1 million soldiers who got killed in China in the late 1930s and early 1940s. China has top notch military hardware these days. Let's not forget that China has over 25 times as much territory as Japan does.
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom