knight11
BANNED
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Messages
- 1,572
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
So many articles and from so many articles creation of so many threads
Government forces the burden of Tejas on a weak air force
Modi Plumbs For Delayed 'Desi' Jet Over Foreign Fighter Planes
Why Did Narendra Modi Push 'Obsolete' Made-In-India Plane On Reluctant Military?
Exclusive: Modi pushes 'obsolete' made-in-India plane on reluctant military
Modi pushes 'obsolete' Tejas on reluctant military
Modi govt pushes 'obsolete' made-in-India Tejas jet on Air Force
PM Narendra Modi's Make-in-India plan could hurt IAF
There is one news agencies called Reuter. Most of the articles are sourced from Reuters . You just have to plant one in Reuters or AFP to get coverage first in all tier 2 newspapers and then to trigger "exclusive investigation" reports from tier 1 newspapers and channels. Everyone loves a good controversy, and the so called devense generalists could earn money to feed his children.
Lets see what our experts view on that
Retired Air Marshal M. Matheswaran, a former deputy chief of the Integrated Defence Staff, said the LCA was obsolete.
"It is a very short-range aircraft which has no relevance in today's war fighting scenarios. If you are trying to justify this as a replacement for follow-on Rafales, you are comparing apples with oranges."
He said the plane was at best a technology demonstrator on which Indian engineers could build the next series of aircraft, not something the air force could win a war with.
Now you know from where does the Desi media got the world OBSOLUTE.
But check what he want to say short-range aircraft -- Lca is point defence so whats the problem Janab
If you are trying to justify this as a replacement for follow-on Rafales -- Who is saying Rafale its the replacement of MIG -21
best a technology demonstrator -- Thats need to be checked for that check what about its shortfalls post IOC-2
1. Radar range problem -- Better with Mig -21bis thats what it is replacing
2. Short range -- Same as Mig 21 bison
3. No aeriel fuel probe -- Bison don't have either
4. STR less --- So Mig21 was the best anyway why in the light of HOBS like Python 5 and R-73.
5. No IOC no FOC no Induction -- when Jaguar served india for 1 decade with faulty navigational sensor, Mirrage 2000H joined IAF with 7 years without any missile only guns, Su30-MKI posted to Srilanka with Guns only wanted internal jammer, rwr, maw in LCA, question is does MKI have internal jammer, does it have MAW till now LOLZ
6. He said the plane was at best a technology demonstrator on which Indian engineers could build the next series of aircraft, not something the air force could win a war with. -- Our first attempt to build the fighter plane was H24 Marut and earlier on India did work on GNAT and probably was impressed with it, a small nimble, agile fighter but why LCA is smallest of any 4th gen fighter, thus creating so much problem in putting the stuff packed inside the fighter plane, its because it is build on the GNAT. And have the Designer not gone for the higher tech. implemented like FWB, FADEEC, Glass cockpit, composite structure the IAF would have scraped it into dustbin.
I am working on compiling all this bullshit in the form of project, will post duly when ready.
Government forces the burden of Tejas on a weak air force
Modi Plumbs For Delayed 'Desi' Jet Over Foreign Fighter Planes
Why Did Narendra Modi Push 'Obsolete' Made-In-India Plane On Reluctant Military?
Exclusive: Modi pushes 'obsolete' made-in-India plane on reluctant military
Modi pushes 'obsolete' Tejas on reluctant military
Modi govt pushes 'obsolete' made-in-India Tejas jet on Air Force
PM Narendra Modi's Make-in-India plan could hurt IAF
There is one news agencies called Reuter. Most of the articles are sourced from Reuters . You just have to plant one in Reuters or AFP to get coverage first in all tier 2 newspapers and then to trigger "exclusive investigation" reports from tier 1 newspapers and channels. Everyone loves a good controversy, and the so called devense generalists could earn money to feed his children.
Lets see what our experts view on that
Retired Air Marshal M. Matheswaran, a former deputy chief of the Integrated Defence Staff, said the LCA was obsolete.
"It is a very short-range aircraft which has no relevance in today's war fighting scenarios. If you are trying to justify this as a replacement for follow-on Rafales, you are comparing apples with oranges."
He said the plane was at best a technology demonstrator on which Indian engineers could build the next series of aircraft, not something the air force could win a war with.
Now you know from where does the Desi media got the world OBSOLUTE.
But check what he want to say short-range aircraft -- Lca is point defence so whats the problem Janab
If you are trying to justify this as a replacement for follow-on Rafales -- Who is saying Rafale its the replacement of MIG -21
best a technology demonstrator -- Thats need to be checked for that check what about its shortfalls post IOC-2
1. Radar range problem -- Better with Mig -21bis thats what it is replacing
2. Short range -- Same as Mig 21 bison
3. No aeriel fuel probe -- Bison don't have either
4. STR less --- So Mig21 was the best anyway why in the light of HOBS like Python 5 and R-73.
5. No IOC no FOC no Induction -- when Jaguar served india for 1 decade with faulty navigational sensor, Mirrage 2000H joined IAF with 7 years without any missile only guns, Su30-MKI posted to Srilanka with Guns only wanted internal jammer, rwr, maw in LCA, question is does MKI have internal jammer, does it have MAW till now LOLZ
6. He said the plane was at best a technology demonstrator on which Indian engineers could build the next series of aircraft, not something the air force could win a war with. -- Our first attempt to build the fighter plane was H24 Marut and earlier on India did work on GNAT and probably was impressed with it, a small nimble, agile fighter but why LCA is smallest of any 4th gen fighter, thus creating so much problem in putting the stuff packed inside the fighter plane, its because it is build on the GNAT. And have the Designer not gone for the higher tech. implemented like FWB, FADEEC, Glass cockpit, composite structure the IAF would have scraped it into dustbin.
I am working on compiling all this bullshit in the form of project, will post duly when ready.
Ruag Aviation is getting the airframe build by the Tata aerospace, then why not ask tata to build, because they have experience in C-F-C building of airframe.Does Ruag Aviation of Ruag Defense has credentials in manufacturing military aircrafts? I can find Do228NG, some small arms, land vehicles, training supports, etc., but no military aircraft. If they provide assembly lines for LCA, is this new business for them? Please share info if there is any.
Last edited: