What's new

Why India will never go to war with Pakistan

Should I add some more?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't break your keyboards on the trolls, Report and move on as the legend Oscar sahaab said

It's expected to get some sort of slime bags crawling out of the sewers and into these threads, especially when they involve these sorts of matters.
 
. . . .
We have been through this before, your pitiful nation with its third rate scientists cannot and has not achieved thermonuclear capability, you have plutonium based fission boosted weapons which have a yield of 20kt.

What about Pakistan? What does Pakistan have ?

Yield from thermonuclear device, which was stepped down from 200 kilotonnes to 60 Kt, to prevent damage to nearby villages, gave a yield of 56 Kts.

In 1998 itself, India had 200 Kilotonnes thermonuclear weapons. Now India is producing weapons over megaton yield, mostly China specific.

Where has Pakistan neither succeeded or not even tested a thermonuclear device.

The fact that Indian is much larger than Pakistan and has a population 6 times that of Pakistan.

Pakistan would need 6 times the yield available with India, to cause equivalent damage to India.
 
. .
India has never started any of the wars against Pakistan so there is no reason to expect they will do so in future. Indian leaders have always clearly stated they do not aspire for territorial expansion.
 
. .
What about Pakistan? What does Pakistan have ?

Yield from thermonuclear device, which was stepped down from 200 kilotonnes to 60 Kt, to prevent damage to nearby villages, gave a yield of 56 Kts.

In 1998 itself, India had 200 Kilotonnes thermonuclear weapons. Now India is producing weapons over megaton yield, mostly China specific.

Where has Pakistan neither succeeded or not even tested a thermonuclear device.

The fact that Indian is much larger than Pakistan and has a population 6 times that of Pakistan.

Pakistan would need 6 times the yield available with India, to cause equivalent damage to India.
So DRDO has finally found someone gullible enough to take in their tripe lol...................dude your explosion fizzled out and it was not nearly 56kt:lol:.

Why do you think so ??
I do not need to think , I KNOW!

@Photon The Chinese, Russian, Americans , British , French....... must be :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: Exactly.
 
.
So DRDO has finally found someone gullible enough to take in their tripe lol...................dude your explosion fizzled out and it was not nearly 56kt:lol:.


I do not need to think , I KNOW!

@Photon The Chinese, Russian, Americans , British , French....... must be :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: Exactly.

Correction.. the yield was 45 Kt, Not 56 Kt.

The Army should be fully confident as there was no doubt about the nuclear arsenal at its command, the former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) chairman Anil Kakodkar said, seeking to put at rest questions raised over the efficacy of the country’s hydrogen bomb test.

“I think that is guaranteed. The Army should be fully confident. There is no doubt about the arsenal at their command,” he told Karan Thapar on the ‘Devil’s Advocate’ programme on CNN-IBN.

Mr. Kakodkar, who retired from service on November 30, was asked about the remark of the former Army Chief, V.P. Malik, that nuclear scientists should assure the armed forces about the efficacy of the thermonuclear device.

He ruled out the need for further thermonuclear tests, saying the country has several hydrogen bombs with a yield “much more” than 45 kilo tons. “Of course. Why do you put singular, use plural?” he shot back when asked whether India had a thermonuclear bomb.

“Much more than that. I said from up to low kilotons to 200 kilotons,” he said when asked whether the hydrogen bomb had a yield of 45 kilo tons.


Mr. Kakodkar dismissed former DRDO scientist K. Santhanam’s claims over the success of the 1998 thermonuclear tests, saying it would not be correct to assume that he (the defence scientist) knew everything. “We required logistic support which was provided by DRDO…things were being done on a need-to-know basis. To assume that Santhanam knew everything is not correct. Santhanam knew what was within his responsibility,” he said.

Mr. Kakodkar also said it was “totally erroneous” to conclude that the hydrogen bomb test was not a success.

“It is a totally erroneous conclusion. The yield of thermonuclear test was verified, not by one method but by several methods and by different groups, and this has been reviewed in detail,” he said. I had described the tests as perfect in 1998 and I stand by that,” added Mr. Kakodkar, who played key roles in the nuclear tests of 1974 and 1998.

He also said the instruments used by the DRDO to measure the yield of the tests did not work. “I myself had reviewed this immediately after the test and we concluded that these instruments did not work…If the instruments did not work, where is the question of going by the assertions based on them and what is the basis of those assertions?” he said.

On former AEC chief P.K. Iyengar’s support to Mr. Santhanam’s claims, Mr. Kakodkar said: “Iyengar was not in the picture as far as 1998 tests were concerned. He knows only as much as has been published. Nothing more.”

So DRDO has finally found someone gullible enough to take in their tripe lol...................dude your explosion fizzled out and it was not nearly 56kt:lol:.


I do not need to think , I KNOW!

@Photon The Chinese, Russian, Americans , British , French....... must be :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: Exactly.

Nuclear weapons are not DRDO's responsibility ,they are AEC's.


Santhanam was a DRDO scientist.
 
.
"Broken in two" :lol: You guys love to exaggerate don't you?

It would have been an exaggeration had i stated "balkanized"

we did what we could, china was weak and poor then, right in the middle of Culture revolution.
During the culture revolution China supported the North Vietnamese regime in Vietnam war also fought with the Soviets but did not provide support to Pakistan?

Sounds more like a case of China revealing what Pakistan actually meant to it in 1971.
 
.
What about Pakistan? What does Pakistan have ?

Yield from thermonuclear device, which was stepped down from 200 kilotonnes to 60 Kt, to prevent damage to nearby villages, gave a yield of 56 Kts.

In 1998 itself, India had 200 Kilotonnes thermonuclear weapons. Now India is producing weapons over megaton yield, mostly China specific.

Where has Pakistan neither succeeded or not even tested a thermonuclear device.

The fact that Indian is much larger than Pakistan and has a population 6 times that of Pakistan.

Pakistan would need 6 times the yield available with India, to cause equivalent damage to India.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_India

law of physics cease to exist in India. Yields for any thermonuclear bombs is in the range of 300 Kt to Mt. How can u have 60 kt thermo, there is a name for that , my friend. That word is dud
 
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_India

law of physics cease to exist in India. Yields for any thermonuclear bombs is in the range of 300 Kt to Mt. How can u have 60 kt thermo, there is a name for that , my friend. That word is dud

Pokharan test range(where Indian has done 3 rounds of nuclear tests 1974 -1998) does not have space to test 200 Kiloton weapon. As nearby villages would have been damaged.


If Indian tried move the villages away, would have tipped off the Americans and tests would have had to be stopped, as we had too in1996.

Secrecy was of paramount importance, India stepped downed the yield of thermonuclear weapon , to prevent damage to the nearby inhabitants.
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom