The short answer is no.
Population does not decide entry in the UN Security Council.
I think the biggest point being...., india refuses to hold a (read) UN issued Plebiscite on Kashmir which it forcibly occupies and continues to do so.
so why would it want a seat on it.
Its many social indices are lower than those found in Sub-Saharan Africa
Rampant caste distinction/racism, extreme and endemic poverty, chronic food shortages, internal chaos and abuse of Sikhs, Christians, Dalits(untouchables) and Muslims.
Disputes with each and everyone of its neighboors bar no exception
Involvement and sponsorship of terror groups within its own and in neighbooring and regional countries (Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Panjab(sikh) etc..)
Someone mentioned responsible nuclear power? if you call diverting peaceful Canadian nuclear reactors into a ''secret'' nuclear program responsible, then you might have to look at the definition again. India unnecessarily introduced nuclear weopons and WMD into South Asia by detonating a nuclear device in 1974 near Pakistan's border and is encouraging an arms race. Infact, many countries including Pakistan have been willing to make South Asia a nuclear free zone, guess who opposes it.. india.
India does not even come close to being considered a responsible nation let along one that could be part of the UNSC.
Again, though, this thread is just ridiculous, but Im going to repeat it again: They are refusing to hold a UN sponsored plebiscite in Indian occupied Kashmir!
Population does not decide entry in the UN Security Council.
I think the biggest point being...., india refuses to hold a (read) UN issued Plebiscite on Kashmir which it forcibly occupies and continues to do so.
so why would it want a seat on it.
Its many social indices are lower than those found in Sub-Saharan Africa
Rampant caste distinction/racism, extreme and endemic poverty, chronic food shortages, internal chaos and abuse of Sikhs, Christians, Dalits(untouchables) and Muslims.
Disputes with each and everyone of its neighboors bar no exception
Involvement and sponsorship of terror groups within its own and in neighbooring and regional countries (Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Panjab(sikh) etc..)
Someone mentioned responsible nuclear power? if you call diverting peaceful Canadian nuclear reactors into a ''secret'' nuclear program responsible, then you might have to look at the definition again. India unnecessarily introduced nuclear weopons and WMD into South Asia by detonating a nuclear device in 1974 near Pakistan's border and is encouraging an arms race. Infact, many countries including Pakistan have been willing to make South Asia a nuclear free zone, guess who opposes it.. india.
India does not even come close to being considered a responsible nation let along one that could be part of the UNSC.
Again, though, this thread is just ridiculous, but Im going to repeat it again: They are refusing to hold a UN sponsored plebiscite in Indian occupied Kashmir!