jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
It will not be the first time China fighting an insurgency after 1949. I am getting an impression that you are either consciously or subconsciously underestimate the capability of Chinese army in fighting insurgency and trying to tell people that they will be novices in this business.
Usually, except those racist thugs, armies don't purposely destroy people's homes, unless there is a fight coming from those homes. When that happens, you probably already have an insurgency in hand.
Am I underestimating China capability of fighting an insurgency? Don't know, I said what I said base on my own experience. And my experience is this, NOBODY IN THIS WORLD is ready to deal with insurgency. US military has been dealing with insurgency since 1960 since Vietnam war, from Vietnam to Philippine, to Bolivia to Afghanistan, to Grenada to Peru, to Cuba, to Iran, to Congo, to Iraq and back to Afghanistan. I mean, we fought in Afghanistan twice, dealing with pretty much the same people (albeit a few generation later) yet when I step foot in Afghanistan in 2005, I know nothing fighting an active insurgency when I first arrived.
Now you may think the US military is a failed force, well, that's your opinion, and if you think so, then name me one armed force that is more capable than the US military.
So, what make you think PLA, which have relatively little fighting experience, even less in insurgency warfare, have the capability to deal with one? On a wing and a prayer and start a war then hope everything is A-OK?
You overestimate insurgency. An insurgency can only survive if there is foreign backing, and access to backers borders. SAA conquered rebel parts and there is no insurgency because they control the border.
umm, I am not going to deal with you anymore, quite obviously you have something wrong in the head.