Why China does NOT fear India's missiles

[Oldman1]

So the American propaganda machine is at it again。

Pitting China against India。

Never forget that the US is the source of all evils of whatever a nature！

But its true isn't it? That shooting down the satellite. Making nuclear missiles obsolete. No fear of Indian missiles.

 

[Omega007]

Only if you are located near the launch site.



That is true.
That is why you also need a mid course interceptor missile with an exo atmospheric kinetic kill vehicle. Does India have one ???

Of course.It's called PDV.

Interception altitude : 160 km

Velocity : Mach 5-6

 

[itaskol]

we dont fear india missile not because of missile interception ability.

because major cities of china far away from india. you dont have enough icbm.
but india cities very close to xingjiang and tibet.

and india country size is smaller.

if india start nuclear war against china，india will lose more than china

no one believe india will lauch nuclear ICBM to china

 

[nik22]

This article is just Trash. Every country fear capability of adversary.
Regarding a silly argument about range, should not be a problem for our scientists to increase to 8000 km

BTW, we do have submarine launched missiles. Should be all set in couple of years

 

[DrSomnath999]

And You should get a Padma shri for Predicting that ?? Totally Irrelevant

oh yes why not!!

irrevalant!! hmm

atleast not for IDRW.org for sure as these kind of sensational articles are typical news for IDRW.org .just like india TV .

S-300 or S-400 are not ABMs , they Primarily were designed to Protect airspace against Aircrafts and are effective only against missiles with shorter range , even Patriot missiles had tough time against scud missiles

.
S-400 doesnt have ABM capability

then WTH was it designed for by the Russians to shoot birds or UFO in the sky

BTW an interesting exercpt from an article

India will also be impacted by the S-400. Because the system can defend against ballistic missiles, China’s deployment of the S-400 could jeopardize India’s strategic deterrent, which currently relies heavily on land-based missiles. This is likely one of the reasons that India’s next government is expected to reassess India’s no-first use nuclear doctrine. Should China launch a first strike on India’s nuclear arsenal that was able to wipe out most of its strategic forces, it could use missile defense systems like the S-400 to potentially defend against the remaining missiles.

Putin Approves Sale of S-400 to China | The Diplomat

CHEERS

 

[DrSomnath999]

Only if you are located near the launch site.

quite correct
but also early detection of missile launch coupled with airborne platforms capable of destroying BMs in their boost phase

in future UAVs may be used for that role Isreal is planning that for future

That is true.
That is why you also need a mid course interceptor missile with an exo atmospheric kinetic kill vehicle. Does India have one ???

the pic u posted depicts a weapon system to be deployed in space , i dont think India would deploy weapons in space

BTW india did achieve exo atmospheric kill in the form of PDV

India successfully test-fires PDV missile interceptor
India successfully conducted a high-altitude test of a new interceptor missile capable of neutralising incoming long-range missiles on 27 April.

The Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV) is a two-stage solid propellant interceptor that is a modified version of the Prithvi liquid-propellant tactical ballistic missile. It is designed to shoot down intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), such as Pakistan's Ghauri and Shaheen missiles, at an altitude of 110-150 km within a range of 2,500 km.

This is substantially higher than the 50 km-high interceptions carried out by the exo-atmospheric Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) missile, which the DRDO is reported to have started developing in 1999.
India successfully test-fires PDV missile interceptor - IHS Jane's 360

CHEERS

 

[Penguin]

Take a hard and long look at

Libya
Egypt
Syria
Afghanistan
Iraq
Palestine
Ukraine and to a certain extent
Pakistan

What have become of these countries？

Death and destruction where there is deep US involvement and interference。

The US is THE plague。

Sure, and the peoples of these countries, other countries beside the US (e.g. Russia, China, India in the cases mentioned above) and certain country-less elements don't play a role and have no responsibility of their own? And how about CHina's own role and responsibilities in the world. E.g. Sudan .

I respect the fact that we may differ in our opinion, so long as you realize that the above is OPINION and not necessarily FACT or CORRECT. Accusing others of propaganda simply because they have a different pov is not the way we both are expected to conduct ourselves here on this forum.

 

[Omega007]

oh yes why not!!

irrevalant!! hmm

atleast not for IDRW.org for sure as these kind of sensational articles are typical news for IDRW.org .just like india TV .




.
S-400 doesnt have ABM capability

then WTH was it designed for by the Russians to shoot birds or UFO in the sky

BTW an interesting exercpt from an article

Putin Approves Sale of S-400 to China | The Diplomat

CHEERS

oh yes why not!!

irrevalant!! hmm

atleast not for IDRW.org for sure as these kind of sensational articles are typical news for IDRW.org .just like india TV .




.
S-400 doesnt have ABM capability

then WTH was it designed for by the Russians to shoot birds or UFO in the sky

BTW an interesting exercpt from an article

Putin Approves Sale of S-400 to China | The Diplomat

CHEERS

You don't understand the concept,do you brother.Ok,here's the deal - The S 400 (as other long range SAMs like the S 300 variants,Aster 30,HQ 9 etc) are long range SAMs with SECONDARY ABM capabilities.

Its maximum target interception altitude is not more than 30 km and its top speed is also much lower than other dedicated ABM interceptors like Arrow 2/3,SM 3 and THAAD.

S 400 has got very limited terminal ABM capability against MRBMs with unitary warheads due to their slower velocity and lower interception altitude.And in order to intercept modern Ballistic Missile warheads,you need to kill them in their midcourse,well out side of the atmosphere.That's why countries including India,Israel and US are working on high speed exoatmospheric interceptors.If terminal interception was all that was needed,they wouldn't have wasting so much time and resources on a seemingly unnecessary development!!

Besides,we don't know how much efficient and effective those S 400 missile rounds would be against ballistic missiles since till date we haven't heard about any ballistic missile interception by this system.All we've come to know range from the words of some journos and so called experts with reports of dubious values to plain propaganda.Its tests haven't been documented like the Israeli or Indian or US systems,so its effectiveness isn't really beyond doubt.It's like saying that Akash can make India immune from Pakistani missiles since it has got a SECONDARY ABM capability,although we've never seen it achieving such a feat!!

 

[INDIC]

So the American propaganda machine is at it again。

Pitting China against India。

Never forget that the US is the source of all evils of whatever a nature！

Are American responsible for China encroaching in Indian territory with their tents.

 

[LURKER]

we dont fear india missile not because of missile interception ability.

because major cities of china far away from india. you dont have enough icbm.
but india cities very close to xingjiang and tibet.

and india country size is smaller.

if india start nuclear war against china，india will lose more than china

no one believe india will lauch nuclear ICBM to china

We don't need 'many ICBMs' to inflict serious damage on major Chinese cities incase of a first strike by China on Indian cities.

Both will lose thats for sure, we can calculate who lost more after the nooclear war gets over .

India has a NFU Policy, try launching a nooclear missile on India and you'll start believing that India can also launch one

 

[INDIC]

we dont fear india missile not because of missile interception ability.

because major cities of china far away from india. you dont have enough icbm.
but india cities very close to xingjiang and tibet.

and india country size is smaller.

if india start nuclear war against china，india will lose more than china

no one believe india will lauch nuclear ICBM to china

We also have missile inception in India, so stop talking nonsense.

Indian Ballistic Missile Defence Programme - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[cirr]

But its true isn't it? That shooting down the satellite. Making nuclear missiles obsolete. No fear of Indian missiles.

Yeah。

Surprising that the US propaganda machines failed to come up with 5 American weapons that China，India、Russia、Vietnam、Japan，or indeed the whole world fear most？

Or is it a surprise？

We all know what the US is up to。

Just that most countries which are “tamed” by America's despotic power，are afraid to speak out loud

 

[Broccoli]

FJ ABM - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
640 Project - Anti-Ballistic Missile Programs

 

[a.kumar]

oh yes why not!!

irrevalant!! hmm

atleast not for IDRW.org for sure as these kind of sensational articles are typical news for IDRW.org .just like india TV .




.
S-400 doesnt have ABM capability

then WTH was it designed for by the Russians to shoot birds or UFO in the sky

BTW an interesting exercpt from an article

Putin Approves Sale of S-400 to China | The Diplomat

CHEERS

Which idiot started this " sensational article " as claimed by you ?? Ohh it was You . Do You suffer from split personality ??

I had clearly said S-400 has limited ABM capability to Intercept low range Ballistic missiles , Show me a Proof that Shows S-400 has brought down long range Ballistic missile ??

THAAD is only effective ABM , but that too has its own share of problems .

 

[me_itsme]

quite correct
but also early detection of missile launch coupled with airborne platforms capable of destroying BMs in their boost phase

in future UAVs may be used for that role Isreal is planning that for future




the pic u posted depicts a weapon system to be deployed in space , i dont think India would deploy weapons in space

BTW india did achieve exo atmospheric kill in the form of PDV

India successfully test-fires PDV missile interceptor
India successfully conducted a high-altitude test of a new interceptor missile capable of neutralising incoming long-range missiles on 27 April.

The Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV) is a two-stage solid propellant interceptor that is a modified version of the Prithvi liquid-propellant tactical ballistic missile. It is designed to shoot down intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), such as Pakistan's Ghauri and Shaheen missiles, at an altitude of 110-150 km within a range of 2,500 km.

This is substantially higher than the 50 km-high interceptions carried out by the exo-atmospheric Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) missile, which the DRDO is reported to have started developing in 1999.
India successfully test-fires PDV missile interceptor - IHS Jane's 360

CHEERS

lol...look into exo atmos kinetic kill vehicle.