What's new

Why Chengdu J-10C 4.5th Gen Fighter Can Easily Eat Alive F-16 Block 52 ?

.
Chinese war tech has bad reputation is more to do with misinfo and lot of smearing from fanboy media. Just checkout youtube and see how many junk video of Chinese military hardware?


There are plenty of area which China military taking the lead and clear missile is the area of Chinese expertise with ASBM like DF-21 and DF-26. It isnt hard to be convinced of China PL-15 capabilities over AIM-120.


This guy logic is very amusing :enjoy:
According to him, as long as american doesn't make it, technically it's impossible.


While keep Ignoring the Fact that PL-15 AAM using Dual-Pulse Motor Technology to Extend their Range without any significant increase in size. Compared to Conventional AIM-120D.

Even USAAF Officer admit that China's PL-15 AAM which uses Dual-Pulse Rocket Motor was the Key Factor that drove the american to begin JATM program (replacement of AIM-120 amraam)
Screenshot_20210711-173159_Chrome.jpg

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...nd-navys-future-long-range-air-to-air-missile


His mind still stuck in 90s China. He doesn't realize that China's Military have Superiority in some aspect.
Just like World's First Operational HGV (Hypersonic Glide Vehicle Technology) DF-17

According to him it's Fake too. Because it's technically impossible for others to deploy what the US not yet achieve before
 
.
Chinese war tech has bad reputation is more to do with misinfo and lot of smearing from fanboy media. Just checkout youtube and see how many junk video of Chinese military hardware?


There are plenty of area which China military taking the lead and clear missile is the area of Chinese expertise with ASBM like DF-21 and DF-26. It isnt hard to be convinced of China PL-15 capabilities over AIM-120.
I agree with you there, a lot of misinfo is spread about chinese technology due to these dumb “defense experts” online. Most of which happen to be Indian Youtubers. I don’t doubt that China can make great military tech, but a lot of its defamation is due to stupid biased fanboys like the ones around here that think China makes magical alien technology and has left behind US and Europe in the dark ages. It makes Chinese tech look like it’s propaganda and it makes it difficult to have a good discussion about it because they’re never willing to admit that anyone other than China can make good tech too. China is but a competitor among the others, all of whom make great stuff.
China still has a ways to go before it surpasses either of them, but it has definitely caught up fast and continues to improve.
 
.
I agree with you there, a lot of misinfo is spread about chinese technology due to these dumb “defense experts” online. Most of which happen to be Indian Youtubers. I don’t doubt that China can make great military tech, but a lot of its defamation is due to stupid biased fanboys like the ones around here that think China makes magical alien technology and has left behind US and Europe in the dark ages. It makes Chinese tech look like it’s propaganda and it makes it difficult to have a good discussion about it because they’re never willing to admit that anyone other than China can make good tech too. China is but a competitor among the others, all of whom make great stuff.
China still has a ways to go before it surpasses either of them, but it has definitely caught up fast and continues to improve.

Since when Dual-Pulse Motor Technology to extend the range of the missile without significantly increase the size is alien magical technology :lol:

Typical american fanboy, always using formula american is the best hoorah leader while others must be a followers
 
.
I agree with you there, a lot of misinfo is spread about chinese technology due to these dumb “defense experts” online. Most of which happen to be Indian Youtubers. I don’t doubt that China can make great military tech, but a lot of its defamation is due to stupid biased fanboys like the ones around here that think China makes magical alien technology and has left behind US and Europe in the dark ages. It makes Chinese tech look like it’s propaganda and it makes it difficult to have a good discussion about it because they’re never willing to admit that anyone other than China can make good tech too. China is but a competitor among the others, all of whom make great stuff.
China still has a ways to go before it surpasses either of them, but it has definitely caught up fast and continues to improve.
Sorry, most of the anti-China youtuber are not Indian but American, vietnamese and in Chinese language, its the Taiwanese.

The example I provided are the best example! They are many already that its the West that needs to catch up with China too. Watch out for latest Type003 aircraft carrier with Electric Catapult and the Railgun going to install on 055 soon.
 
.
Sorry, most of the anti-China youtuber are not Indian but American, vietnamese and in Chinese language, its the Taiwanese.

The example I provided are the best example! They are many already that its the West that needs to catch up with China too. Watch out for latest Type003 aircraft carrier with Electric Catapult and the Railgun going to install on 055 soon.
Really looking forward to the Chinese carrier, the one after 003 too, since it’s meant to be nuclear powered. the speed at which it was built was hilariously quick, you could see the progress in real time almost.
 
.
Fact of the matter is that the Su-30MKK, a twin-seater, has superior STR to single-seat J-10A. PLANAF has admitted that J-10A holds the advantage in BVR while the Su-30 has an advantage in the WVR.

The problem here is that China’s legacy flankers still rely on twist cassegrain radars/relatively backwards avionics, which gives the J-10s an advantage in the BVR. F-16 block 52s have no such problems and even the radar advantage can potentially be negated shouldthe radar be upgraded. The idea that the J-10C could easily trounce a F-16 Block 52 is absurd.
 
.
Fact of the matter is that the Su-30MKK, a twin-seater, has superior STR to single-seat J-10A. PLANAF has admitted that J-10A holds the advantage in BVR while the Su-30 has an advantage in the WVR.

The problem here is that China’s legacy flankers still rely on twist cassegrain radars/relatively backwards avionics, which gives the J-10s an advantage in the BVR. F-16 block 52s have no such problems and even the radar advantage can potentially be negated shouldthe radar be upgraded. The idea that the J-10C could easily trounce a F-16 Block 52 is absurd.
F16 V standard update again make it superior to j10c
 
. . . . .
.
Nope. F-16V lacks DSI, IRST, whole bunch of things J-10C has.
1. DSI helps reduce RCS of an aircraft but what about other characteristics? J-10C have canards, external payload and standard engines which will increase visibility of the jet fighter.

There are different ways to reduce RCS of an aircraft. DSI is insufficient tout on its own.

2. F-16 Block 70/72 can be equipped with Legion-ES solution (embedded option), and Legion Pod (payload option).
 
.
J-10C have canards

If you have frontal control surfaces you don't have rear control surfaces. Canards on its own does not increase RCS. The deletion of rear control surfaces offsets increase in RCS due to addition of frontal control surfaces. J-10 has lower RCS than F-16 due to DSI.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom