What's new

Which Asian nations were never colonized by European nations?

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
Which Asian Nations Were Never Colonized by Europe?

Kallie Szczepanski

October 16, 2019

Between the 16th and 20th centuries, various European nations set out to conquer the world and take all of its wealth. They seized lands in North and South America, Australia and New Zealand, Africa, and Asia as colonies. Some countries were able to fend off annexation, however, either through rugged terrain, fierce fighting, skillful diplomacy, or a lack of attractive resources. Which Asian countries, then, escaped colonization by Europeans?

This question seems straightforward, but the answer is rather complicated. Many Asian regions escaped direct annexation as colonies by the European powers, yet were still under various degrees of domination by the western powers. Here then are the Asian nations that were not colonized, roughly ordered from most autonomous to least autonomous:

Asian Nations That Were Not Colonized

Japan
Faced with the threat of western encroachment, Tokugawa Japan reacted by completely revolutionizing its social and political structures in the Meiji Restoration of 1868. By 1895, it was able to defeat the former East Asian great power, Qing China, in the First Sino-Japanese War. Meiji Japan stunned Russia and the other European powers in 1905 when it won the Russo-Japanese War. It would go on to annex Korea and Manchuria, and then seize much of Asia during World War II. Rather than being colonized, Japan became an imperial power in its own right.

Siam (Thailand)
Late in the nineteenth century, the Kingdom of Siam found itself in an uncomfortable position between the French imperial possessions of French Indochina (now Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos) to the east, and British Burma (now Myanmar) to the west. The Siamese king Chulalongkorn the Great, also called Rama V (ruled 1868–1910), managed to fend off both the French and the British through skillful diplomacy. He adopted many European customs and was intensely interested in European technologies. He also played the British and French off one another, preserving most of Siam's territory and its independence.

The Ottoman Empire (Turkey)
The Ottoman Empire was too large, powerful, and complex for any one European power to simply annex it outright. However, during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the European powers peeled off its territories in northern Africa and southeast Europe by seizing them directly or by encouraging and supplying local independence movements. Beginning with the Crimean War (1853–56), the Ottoman government or Sublime Porte had to borrow money from European banks to finance its operations. When it was unable to repay the money it owed to the London and Paris-based banks, the banks took control of the Ottoman revenue system, seriously infringing on the Porte's sovereignty. Foreign interests also invested heavily in railroad, port, and infrastructure projects, giving them even more power within the tottering empire. The Ottoman Empire remained self-governing until it fell after World War I, but foreign banks and investors wielded an inordinate amount of power there.

China
Like the Ottoman Empire, Qing China was too large for any single European power to simply grab. Instead, Britain and France got a foothold through trade, which they then expanded through the First and Second Opium Wars. Once they had gained major concessions in the treaties following those wars, other powers such as Russia, Italy, the US, and even Japan demanded similar favored nation status. The powers divided coastal China up into "spheres of influence" and stripped the hapless Qing Dynasty of much of its sovereignty, without ever actually annexing the country. Japan did annex the Qing homeland of Manchuria in 1931, however.

Afghanistan
Both Great Britain and Russia hoped to seize Afghanistan as part of their "Great Game"—a competition for land and influence in Central Asia. However, the Afghans had other ideas; they famously "don't like foreigners with guns in their country," as U.S. diplomat and political Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928–2017) once remarked. They slaughtered or captured an entire British army in the First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842), with only one army medic making it back to India to tell the tale. In the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880), Britain fared somewhat better. It was able to make a deal with the newly-installed ruler, Amir Abdur Rahman (emir from 1880–1901), that gave Britain control of Afghanistan's foreign relations, while the emir took care of domestic matters. This shielded British India from Russian expansionism while leaving Afghanistan more or less independent.

Persia (Iran)
Like Afghanistan, the British and Russians considered Persia an important piece in the Great Game. During the 19th century, Russia nibbled away at northern Persian territory in the Caucasus and in what is now Turkmenistan. Britain extended its influence into the eastern Persian Baluchistan region, which bordered on part of British India (now Pakistan). In 1907, the Anglo-Russian Convention laid out a British sphere of influence in Baluchistan, while Russia got a sphere of influence covering most of the northern half of Persia. Like the Ottomans, the Qajar rulers of Persia had borrowed money from European banks for projects like railroads and other infrastructure improvements, and could not pay back the money. Britain and Russia agreed without consulting the Persian government that they would split the revenues from Persian customs, fisheries, and other industries to amortize the debts. Persia never became a formal colony, but it temporarily lost control of its revenue stream and much of its territory—a source of bitterness to this day.

Partly if not Formally Colonized Nations


Several other Asian countries escaped formal colonization by European powers.

Nepal
Nepal lost about one-third of its territory to the British East India Company's much larger armies in the Anglo-Nepalese War of 1814–1816 (also called the Gurkha War). However, the Gurkhas fought so well and the land was so rugged that the British decided to leave Nepal alone as a buffer state for British India. The British also began to recruit Gurkhas for their colonial army.

Bhutan
Bhutan, another Himalayan kingdom, also faced invasion by the British East India Company but managed to retain its sovereignty. The British sent a force into Bhutan from 1772 to 1774 and seized some territory, but in a peace treaty, they relinquished the land in return for a tribute of five horses and the right to harvest timber on Bhutanese soil. Bhutan and Britain regularly squabbled over their borders until 1947, when the British pulled out of India, but Bhutan's sovereignty was never seriously threatened.

Korea
Korea was a tributary state under Qing Chinese protection until 1895, when Japan seized it in the aftermath of the First Sino-Japanese War. Japan formally colonized Korea in 1910, foreclosing that option for the European powers.

Mongolia
Mongolia also was a tributary of the Qing. After the Last Emperor fell in 1911, Mongolia was independent for some time, but it fell under Soviet domination from 1924 to 1992 as the Mongolian People's Republic.

Ottoman Empire
As the Ottoman Empire gradually weakened and then fell, its territories in the Middle East became British or French protectorates. They were nominally autonomous, and had local rulers, but depended on the European powers for military defense and foreign relations. Bahrain and what is now the United Arab Emirates became British protectorates in 1853. Oman joined them in 1892, as did Kuwait in 1899 and Qatar in 1916. In 1918, the League of Nations assigned Britain a mandate over Iraq, Palestine, and Transjordan (now Jordan). France got mandatory power over Syria and Lebanon. None of these territories was a formal colony, but they were also far from sovereign.

https://www.thoughtco.com/asian-nations-not-colonized-by-europe-195273
 
Oman can be added to the list as well. Parts of Oman were captured by the Portuguese but the country as a whole amazingly was able to not only oust the colonizers eventually, but then went on to establish its own maritime empire stretching all the way to Zanzibar and Tanzania. Pakistan purchased Gwadar from the Omanis in 1958.

250px-Empire_of_Oman.svg.png
 
Japan
Faced with the threat of western encroachment, Tokugawa Japan reacted by completely revolutionizing its social and political structures in the Meiji Restoration of 1868.

"If you can't beat them. Copy them".

Worked like a charm for the Japanese. By copying the West they became as capable as them and in Russo-Japan war the Japs defeated Russia this establishing itself as equal of European powers. In 2019 Pakistani's still have not learn't this lesson. In short by westoxifiing themselves the Japanese became a power to be reckoned with.
 
When the Europeans where living in mud huts and Muslims were the highest civilization, they copied us and became more advanced.

When Europeans became more advance then Muslims, we closed our eyes and ears and went "LaLaLaLa"

a few hundred years later we became their slaves and are still their slaves to this day.
 
Which Asian Nations Were Never Colonized by Europe?

Kallie Szczepanski

October 16, 2019

Between the 16th and 20th centuries, various European nations set out to conquer the world and take all of its wealth. They seized lands in North and South America, Australia and New Zealand, Africa, and Asia as colonies. Some countries were able to fend off annexation, however, either through rugged terrain, fierce fighting, skillful diplomacy, or a lack of attractive resources. Which Asian countries, then, escaped colonization by Europeans?

This question seems straightforward, but the answer is rather complicated. Many Asian regions escaped direct annexation as colonies by the European powers, yet were still under various degrees of domination by the western powers. Here then are the Asian nations that were not colonized, roughly ordered from most autonomous to least autonomous:

Asian Nations That Were Not Colonized

Japan
Faced with the threat of western encroachment, Tokugawa Japan reacted by completely revolutionizing its social and political structures in the Meiji Restoration of 1868. By 1895, it was able to defeat the former East Asian great power, Qing China, in the First Sino-Japanese War. Meiji Japan stunned Russia and the other European powers in 1905 when it won the Russo-Japanese War. It would go on to annex Korea and Manchuria, and then seize much of Asia during World War II. Rather than being colonized, Japan became an imperial power in its own right.

Siam (Thailand)
Late in the nineteenth century, the Kingdom of Siam found itself in an uncomfortable position between the French imperial possessions of French Indochina (now Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos) to the east, and British Burma (now Myanmar) to the west. The Siamese king Chulalongkorn the Great, also called Rama V (ruled 1868–1910), managed to fend off both the French and the British through skillful diplomacy. He adopted many European customs and was intensely interested in European technologies. He also played the British and French off one another, preserving most of Siam's territory and its independence.

The Ottoman Empire (Turkey)
The Ottoman Empire was too large, powerful, and complex for any one European power to simply annex it outright. However, during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the European powers peeled off its territories in northern Africa and southeast Europe by seizing them directly or by encouraging and supplying local independence movements. Beginning with the Crimean War (1853–56), the Ottoman government or Sublime Porte had to borrow money from European banks to finance its operations. When it was unable to repay the money it owed to the London and Paris-based banks, the banks took control of the Ottoman revenue system, seriously infringing on the Porte's sovereignty. Foreign interests also invested heavily in railroad, port, and infrastructure projects, giving them even more power within the tottering empire. The Ottoman Empire remained self-governing until it fell after World War I, but foreign banks and investors wielded an inordinate amount of power there.

China
Like the Ottoman Empire, Qing China was too large for any single European power to simply grab. Instead, Britain and France got a foothold through trade, which they then expanded through the First and Second Opium Wars. Once they had gained major concessions in the treaties following those wars, other powers such as Russia, Italy, the US, and even Japan demanded similar favored nation status. The powers divided coastal China up into "spheres of influence" and stripped the hapless Qing Dynasty of much of its sovereignty, without ever actually annexing the country. Japan did annex the Qing homeland of Manchuria in 1931, however.

Afghanistan
Both Great Britain and Russia hoped to seize Afghanistan as part of their "Great Game"—a competition for land and influence in Central Asia. However, the Afghans had other ideas; they famously "don't like foreigners with guns in their country," as U.S. diplomat and political Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928–2017) once remarked. They slaughtered or captured an entire British army in the First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842), with only one army medic making it back to India to tell the tale. In the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880), Britain fared somewhat better. It was able to make a deal with the newly-installed ruler, Amir Abdur Rahman (emir from 1880–1901), that gave Britain control of Afghanistan's foreign relations, while the emir took care of domestic matters. This shielded British India from Russian expansionism while leaving Afghanistan more or less independent.

Persia (Iran)
Like Afghanistan, the British and Russians considered Persia an important piece in the Great Game. During the 19th century, Russia nibbled away at northern Persian territory in the Caucasus and in what is now Turkmenistan. Britain extended its influence into the eastern Persian Baluchistan region, which bordered on part of British India (now Pakistan). In 1907, the Anglo-Russian Convention laid out a British sphere of influence in Baluchistan, while Russia got a sphere of influence covering most of the northern half of Persia. Like the Ottomans, the Qajar rulers of Persia had borrowed money from European banks for projects like railroads and other infrastructure improvements, and could not pay back the money. Britain and Russia agreed without consulting the Persian government that they would split the revenues from Persian customs, fisheries, and other industries to amortize the debts. Persia never became a formal colony, but it temporarily lost control of its revenue stream and much of its territory—a source of bitterness to this day.

Partly if not Formally Colonized Nations


Several other Asian countries escaped formal colonization by European powers.

Nepal
Nepal lost about one-third of its territory to the British East India Company's much larger armies in the Anglo-Nepalese War of 1814–1816 (also called the Gurkha War). However, the Gurkhas fought so well and the land was so rugged that the British decided to leave Nepal alone as a buffer state for British India. The British also began to recruit Gurkhas for their colonial army.

Bhutan
Bhutan, another Himalayan kingdom, also faced invasion by the British East India Company but managed to retain its sovereignty. The British sent a force into Bhutan from 1772 to 1774 and seized some territory, but in a peace treaty, they relinquished the land in return for a tribute of five horses and the right to harvest timber on Bhutanese soil. Bhutan and Britain regularly squabbled over their borders until 1947, when the British pulled out of India, but Bhutan's sovereignty was never seriously threatened.

Korea
Korea was a tributary state under Qing Chinese protection until 1895, when Japan seized it in the aftermath of the First Sino-Japanese War. Japan formally colonized Korea in 1910, foreclosing that option for the European powers.

Mongolia
Mongolia also was a tributary of the Qing. After the Last Emperor fell in 1911, Mongolia was independent for some time, but it fell under Soviet domination from 1924 to 1992 as the Mongolian People's Republic.

Ottoman Empire
As the Ottoman Empire gradually weakened and then fell, its territories in the Middle East became British or French protectorates. They were nominally autonomous, and had local rulers, but depended on the European powers for military defense and foreign relations. Bahrain and what is now the United Arab Emirates became British protectorates in 1853. Oman joined them in 1892, as did Kuwait in 1899 and Qatar in 1916. In 1918, the League of Nations assigned Britain a mandate over Iraq, Palestine, and Transjordan (now Jordan). France got mandatory power over Syria and Lebanon. None of these territories was a formal colony, but they were also far from sovereign.

https://www.thoughtco.com/asian-nations-not-colonized-by-europe-195273

Yes they may have escaped direct annexation but Japan was obliterated by the allied powers and there wasn't much to take over. China also suffered immense damage at the hands of Western nations.

"If you can't beat them. Copy them".

Worked like a charm for the Japanese. By copying the West they became as capable as them and in Russo-Japan war the Japs defeated Russia this establishing itself as equal of European powers. In 2019 Pakistani's still have not learn't this lesson. In short by westoxifiing themselves the Japanese became a power to be reckoned with.

The irony is here that the Japanese have still kept their culture and it is as strong as ever.
 
Oman can be added to the list as well. Parts of Oman were captured by the Portuguese but the country as a whole amazingly was able to not only oust the colonizers eventually, but then went on to establish its own maritime empire stretching all the way to Zanzibar and Tanzania. Pakistan purchased Gwadar from the Omanis in 1958.

250px-Empire_of_Oman.svg.png

Omanis have an underrated history!!!

If people are wondering why the Ottomans lasted well into ww1 is mainly due to the Ottoman Empire having its place in the Balance of Power among the European Powers. Ottoman empire was better off standing rather than getting destroyed the Russians did not actually want to destroy the Empire all they wanted was the Balkans and the capital while the British believe the Ottomans were useful to contain the Russian Empire even if they were weakening as time went by.

If the Ottoman Empire collapsed it was going to create a power vacuum and even maybe even a war among the Europeans powers lets not forget the various ethnic groups in the empire. The European powers would be faced with a quagmire.
 
Last edited:
Siam is not colonized because the British and French decided to have a buffer to avoid conflict.
 
For the record, Portuguese were masters of Muscat from 1507 to 1650. Oman had become a British Protectorate in 1891 and it was only in 1951 that Oman obtained complete independence from Britain.

Egypt was also never officially colonized. From 1882-1914 Egypt was an unofficial British Protectorate (British had virtual control without any formal authority) and from 1914 to 1922 it was a formal Protectorate when it was given its formal independence. However, the British continued their de-facto occupation until 1956.
 
Useless list.

How in the world can you forget KSA on such a list?:lol: The third richest country on the planet in terms of natural resources and minerals after Russia and USA, 12th largest country in the world and a country whose sons and daughters funded the largest (except for the very short-lived Mongol empire) and most numerous empires, caliphates, kingdoms, sultanates, emirates, sheikdoms, imamates on 3 continent (Asia, Africa and Europe) outside of a few very select European colonial powers.

 
Useless list.

How in the world can you forget KSA on such a list?:lol: The third richest country on the planet in terms of natural resources and minerals after Russia and USA, 12th largest country in the world and a country whose sons and daughters funded the largest (except for the very short-lived Mongol empire) and most numerous empires, caliphates, kingdoms, sultanates, emirates, sheikdoms, imamates on 3 continent (Asia, Africa and Europe) outside of a few very select European colonial powers.


Honorable Sir,

Permit to remind you that Saudi Arabia as we know today only came into being in 1932. One could say that until the 10th Century Arabian Peninsula was ruled by the native Arab dynasties (Umayyad & Abbasids) and therefore free. However, its most developed part, which is the Hejaz region, was under the Fatimid of Egypt from the mid-tenth century AD. Later Ayubid (Kurds) & the Mamlukes (Turks) of Egypt had control over the Hejaz region.

From 16th Century onward most of the Arabian Peninsula was under the Ottoman rule and Ottomans at that time were considered a major European power. Turkey has also tried very hard to join the European Union; she did not succeed only because of opposition from Greece.

In view of the above historical facts, can you honestly claim that the region which is called modern-day Saudi Arabia was never colonized or concquered?
 
Honorable Sir,

Permit to remind you that Saudi Arabia as we know today only came into being in 1932. One could say that until the 10th Century Arabian Peninsula was ruled by the native Arab dynasties (Umayyad & Abbasids) and therefore free. However, its most developed part, which is the Hejaz region, was under the Fatimid of Egypt from the mid-tenth century AD. Later Ayubid (Kurds) & the Mamlukes (Turks) of Egypt had control over the Hejaz region.

From 16th Century onward most of the Arabian Peninsula was under the Ottoman rule and Ottomans at that time were considered a major European power. Turkey has also tried very hard to join the European Union; she did not succeed only because of opposition from Greece.

In view of the above historical facts, can you honestly claim that the region which is called modern-day Saudi Arabia was never colonized or concquered?

Ayyubids were an Arab dynasty (Saladin was partially Arab and completely Arabized, the culture and civilization of the Ayyubid was Arab on every front, the lands as well, and all his descendants are now Arabs and live in KSA and Jordan mainly) and the control of Hijazi was only nominal as Hijaz was ruled by a local dynasty (Sharifs of Makkah). Similarly with the Mamluks who were mostly descendants of former slaves (by Arabs) of Caucasian origins and not Turkish (you probably meant Turkic, in any case they had nothing to do with modern-day Turkey or Turkish people) and were thoroughly Arabized. Similarly with the Ottomans.

At all times Hijaz was ruled by local rulers and the same thoroughly Arabized Ottomans controlled less than 15% of the Arabian Peninsula with local dynasties ruling in Hijaz and Northern Yemen.

So, no modern-day KSA was never colonized by Westerners (ever) and Arabia as a whole (entire region) is unconquered by foreigners (non-Arabs) and most of KSA was never ruled by non-Arabs too. Those dynasties that had a presence in Arabia, were all thoroughly Arabized and never attempted to change anything nor influenced the locals much. It was mostly the other way around.

It does not matter that KSA was founded in 1932 as a modern nation state. No different to the modern nation states of Turkey and Iran who have been under foreign rule (European included) throughout recorded history, unlike Arabia with the Romans and Greeks failing other than Northern Arabia (Northern Hijaz). The history of the land and its ancient provinces remains the same. If KSA was renamed tomorrow to the Republic of Arabia or Kingdom of Arabia, it would all be the same.

Also you either control a country (territory) fully or small parts of it. In any case, no Western power ever conquered all of modern-day KSA despite numerous attempts beginning with the ancient Greeks and Romans.

BTW, I hope you realize that this thread is about Western. In any case, we Arabs used to rule half of Anatolia for centuries (even had kingdoms 2000+ years ago that ruled much of Southern and Eastern Anatolia) and we conquered all of Iran and ruled it for centuries as well. On the other hand Turks and Iranians never ruled all of Arabia or even small parts of it other than the thoroughly Arabized Ottomans whose presence was limited to Hijaz (which had local rulers) and whose presence was negligible to begin with which a simple google search confirms.

BTW, I did a quick google search about this topic, and most of such useless articles, include KSA (its predecessor states included) as well. Rightly so.
 
Last edited:
No one needed to colonize Saudia Arabia, before the discovery of oil nothing productive has ever come out of that Godforsaken land. If it wasn't for the Mamluk Turks the Mongols would have steam rolled into Medina and Mecca without any trouble.
 
Honorable Arab Empire & Caliphates

Ottomans despite being Hanafi Sunni Muslims are not and were never “Arabised” by any stretch of the imagination. Just look at their language, dress habits and culture in general.

As far as region of modern-day Saudi Arabia is concerned, it had been subdivided into 4 distinct regions since ancient times; Hejaz on the Western shore, Nejd in the Middle and “Al-Bahrain” on the East (which included Qatar & Bahraini Islands) with a vast ‘Rub al Khali’ or the empty quarter in the South.

Arguably, except for a brief period in the early 19th century when it was occupied by the Mohammad Ali Pasha of Egypt; Nejd plateau in central Arabia has been largely independent since the decline of Abbasside rule around 10th century. However, Hejaz, as well as the AG coastal region, was under the Ottoman. Ottoman took control of Iraq and Eastern Arabia after defeating the Safavids of Iran during the 1532-1555 Ottoman –Safavi wars.

To the best of my knowledge, Ottomans had 3 Vilayats (Provinces) in the Arabian Peninsula for about 400 years. These were Vilayet of Hejaz, Vilayet of Yemen and Vilayet of Basra. However, if we are talking about a conquest by a non-Muslim European nation, then I agree with you.
 
No one needed to colonize Saudia Arabia, before the discovery of oil nothing productive has ever come out of that Godforsaken land. If it wasn't for the Mamluk Turks the Mongols would have steam rolled into Medina and Mecca without any trouble.

:lol:

The ramblings of an illiterate, ignorant, most likely low IQ Qadiani individual with enormous and obvious inferiority complexes. Talk about a godforsaken brain.

Yes, Arabia, one of the most ancient regions in the world, home to some of the most impressive, most influential and oldest civilizations, home to more World UNESCO Heritage sites (cultural) than any other region in the Muslim world, home to one of the most influential civilizations in the world currently (Arab) and prior to that (Semitic - the oldest in the world) and home to Prophets, numerous famous ancient rulers (some of the most famous in history - Queen of Sheba, Queen Zenobia - to mention a few), 1000's of scientists from the Islamic Golden Age, prior and after (more than any other region), the richest area in the world in terms of natural resources and minerals, home to the most holy sites in the second largest religion (Islam), the same religion that originates in Arabia, one of the most important and strategic locations in the world since time immortal between the 3 main continents in the world and most important waters etc. A region that used to be one of the wealthiest (incense route), a mysterious and majestic region in ancient history since the time of the Sumerians who themselves were originally from Eastern Arabia and whose Epic of Gilgamesh and "Garden of Eden story" is based on the Eastern Arabian Dilmun civilization. The same region that ancient Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, Persians, Portuguese and others tried to conquer but never were able to. The region that is most mentioned in the Bible after Palestine etc. One could go on.

Yes, the same Mongol savages that were defeated by Arabs and who never conquered any other Arab land than parts of modern-day Iraq and Syria and who would never have been able to conquer a huge and geographically impossible region to control like Arabia. Great joke from this troll.
 
Last edited:
:lol:

The ramblings of an illiterate, ignorant, most likely low IQ Qadiani individual with enormous and obvious inferiority complexes. Talk about a godforsaken brain.

Yes, Arabia, one of the most ancient regions in the world, home to some of the most impressive, most influential and oldest civilizations, home to more World UNESCO Heritage sites (cultural) than any other region in the Muslim world, home to one of the most influential civilizations in the world currently (Arab) and prior to that (Semitic - the oldest in the world) and home to Prophets, numerous famous ancient rulers (some of the most famous in history - Queen of Sheba, Queen Zenobia - to mention a few), The richest area in the world in terms of natural resources, home to the most holy sites in the second largest religion (Islam), the same religion that originates in Arabia, one of the most important and strategic locations in the world since time immortal between the 3 main continents in the world and most important waters etc. A region that used to be one of the wealthiest (incense route), a mysterious and majestic region in ancient history since the time of the Sumerians who themselves were originally from Eastern Arabia and whose Epic of Gilgamesh and "Garden of Eden story" is based on the Eastern Arabian Dilmun civilization. The same region that ancient Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, Persians, Portuguese and others tried to conquer but never were able to. The region that is most mentioned in the Bible after Palestine etc. One could go on.

Yes, the same Mongol savages that were defeated by Arabs and who never conquered any other Arab land than parts of modern-day Iraq and Syria and who would never have been able to conquer a huge and geographically impossible region to control like Arabia. Great joke from this troll.

Mongols were defeated by the Mamluks.

Qutuz and Baybars were Kipchak Turks not Arabs.

I do agree Saladin was more of an Arab than a Kurd.
 
Back
Top Bottom