What's new

When did shorts get so commonplace among Indian girls?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh please !

India was always liberal before the Victorian and Islamic phases. We're just going back to Kamasutra times and reclaiming our civilizational heritage ;)

Sex was never a taboo subject

So what you are trying to say.. is that ancient India did little to differentiate it from .. say donkeys.. monkeys.. and the like doing it publicly.. or walking around with their tools hanging out..
Thanks for lessening the respect for the common history..


There is adaptation.. and adopting.. what you feel proud about.. is the latter...a shame it is.
 
.
SATI

Mughal period

Humayun issued a royal fiat against sati, which he later withdrew.
Akbar required that permission be granted by his officials, and these officials were instructed to delay the woman's decision for as long as possible. The reasoning was that she was less likely to choose to die once the emotions of the moment had passed. In the reign of Shah Jahan, widows with children were not allowed to burn under any circumstances . In other cases, governors did not readily give permission, but could be bribed to do so.[19] Later on in the Mughal period, pensions, gifts and rehabilitative help were offered to the potential sati to wean her away from committing the act. Children were strictly forbidden from following the practice. The later Moghul rulers continued to put obstacles in the way but the practice still persisted in areas outside their capitals.
Guru Nanak, the first Guru of the Sikhs spoke out against the practice of sati.
The strongest attempts under the Mughals to control it were made by Aurangzeb. In 1663, he "issued an order that in all lands under Mughal control, never again should the officials allow a woman to be burnt".[20] Despite such attempts however, the practice continued, especially during periods of war and upheaval.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)
 
.
u fool, muslims werent even in india before 1000 ad, islam was only limited to sindh, sati were all hindu traditions, has nothing to do with islam, any slightly sane guy would agree to that, dont throw all your hindu garbages to islam, admit the fact which is as clear as a crystal

U r a kid.. right?? When people dont take History lessons properly they always create ruckus here.. Muhammad Bin Qasim entered in that time India (Say Bharat, Aryavart, Jambudweep whatever) in 723 to attack King Dahir and that is called Islamic invasion to India.. Now if u history books say something else then dont fight here...

Qn stays same... if Sati is not mentioned in anywhere in the religious books then from where did they come.. I give you one stance... Go read Malik Muhammad Jayasi's Padmavat or search for Jauhar/ Rani Padmavati... When Muslim invaders attacked and their husbands were martyred Hindu women started doing Jauhar which later on become a Mal practice named Sati..

Now u enoguh said fool and all hence post reported..
 
.
SATI

Mughal period

Humayun issued a royal fiat against sati, which he later withdrew.
Akbar required that permission be granted by his officials, and these officials were instructed to delay the woman's decision for as long as possible. The reasoning was that she was less likely to choose to die once the emotions of the moment had passed. In the reign of Shah Jahan, widows with children were not allowed to burn under any circumstances . In other cases, governors did not readily give permission, but could be bribed to do so.[19] Later on in the Mughal period, pensions, gifts and rehabilitative help were offered to the potential sati to wean her away from committing the act. Children were strictly forbidden from following the practice. The later Moghul rulers continued to put obstacles in the way but the practice still persisted in areas outside their capitals.
Guru Nanak, the first Guru of the Sikhs spoke out against the practice of sati.
The strongest attempts under the Mughals to control it were made by Aurangzeb. In 1663, he "issued an order that in all lands under Mughal control, never again should the officials allow a woman to be burnt".[20] Despite such attempts however, the practice continued, especially during periods of war and upheaval.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)

Guess what hinduism did not start with mughal period. the oldest known evidence is around 10,000 year old in southern india....

and guess wikipedia is not hindu manuscript.... :lol:
 
. .
So what you are trying to say.. is that ancient India did little to differentiate it from .. say donkeys.. monkeys.. and the like doing it publicly.. or walking around with their tools hanging out..
Thanks for lessening the respect for the common history..


There is adaptation.. and adopting.. what you feel proud about.. is the latter...a shame it is.


Does sex not being taboo means above to you, then you cant be helped...........
 
.
So what you are trying to say.. is that ancient India did little to differentiate it from .. say donkeys.. monkeys.. and the like doing it publicly.. or walking around with their tools hanging out..
Thanks for lessening the respect for the common history..


There is adaptation.. and adopting.. what you feel proud about.. is the latter...a shame it is.

You have a pretty twisted understanding of a liberal mindset.
 
.
Agreed. Too much aping of Western Culture is not good after all our very own culture is second to none.

But as I said if the Gals are comfy and can carry themselves with elan/deceny then I have no problem in it.

Exactly my point. It does not mean that girls start going out in bikini but at the same time they should not be dictated about to wear, jeans, tops, trousers, buisness suits, skirts within decent limits are always fine....
 
  • Like
Reactions: SQ8
.
Y discuss such topic in a countries forum where people are not liberal...Finally they wine Hindus r naked ...Hindus look Ugly...Islam is superior etc...where they can talk any crap about others religion & if some one points outs the fact...then Adim Ban them...Just hypocrisy HINDUS & BUDDHIST are the most Liberal religion in the world...its a fact... & this SAYNARA guy is abusing Hindus still Admin take no action...
 
.
Its funny to see five pages of discussion on Girls wearing shorts on a defence forum.

Keep it up fellas :D
 
.
atleast women have property rights, what rights did hindus give to women??, burn them down after their husbands death??? otherwise susraal walas would make their life miserable

you are talking abt polygamy when you have guys in india who share an indian woman..., a woman is simultaneously married to two indian guys

i just cant believe after coming from so much backwardness and slavery to men, you still have courage to defend your black past while bashing the muslims who made you human and civilized for the first time
 
.
So what you are trying to say.. is that ancient India did little to differentiate it from .. say donkeys.. monkeys.. and the like doing it publicly.. or walking around with their tools hanging out..
Thanks for lessening the respect for the common history..


There is adaptation.. and adopting.. what you feel proud about.. is the latter...a shame it is.

There is a slight line differentiating liberalization Vs Public offence and that should always be respected. Hence above quoted lines comes under crossing lines.

As they say "You are as free as your freedom does not cross mine", hence wearing shorts in public is liberty while wearing nothing is Public offence..
 
.
India has a Constitution which allows every one to wear any DRESS they like & we are using our rights then why does some Pakistanis have problem...we cant follow ur constitution... neither Islam or Hinduism is our official religion...
 
.
atleast women have property rights, what rights did hindus give to women??, burn them down after their husbands death??? otherwise susraal walas would make their life miserable

you are talking abt polygamy when you have guys in india who share an indian woman..., a woman is simultaneously married to two indian guys

i just cant believe after coming from so much backwardness and slavery to men, you still have courage to defend your black past while bashing the muslims who made you human and civilized for the first time

Now I have only one thing to say.. only 18+ should be allowed in this forum.. :)
 
.
atleast women have property rights, what rights did hindus give to women??, burn them down after their husbands death??? otherwise susraal walas would make their life miserable

you are talking abt polygamy when you have guys in india who share an indian woman..., a woman is simultaneously married to two indian guys

i just cant believe after coming from so much backwardness and slavery to men, you still have courage to defend your black past while bashing the muslims who made you human and civilized for the first time
so much for rights in Islam.marry six times, keep women in herds, even pedophilia is common in Islam
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom