What's new

Whatever

Nasa don't use such a high definition cameras i reckon :cheers:

Yes i got it....... you have 1.3 megapixel webcam :rofl:
On serious note. I have 3.2 MP camera. My first digital camera. And i still have it

Dont make fun of it. its my dear.


f60fb46d0190d02adc85872c61946672.jpg


Digital Cameras - Fujifilm FinePix A330 Digital Camera Review, Information, Specifications
 
On serious note. I have 3.2 MP camera. My first digital camera. And i still have it

Dont make fun of it. its my dear.


f60fb46d0190d02adc85872c61946672.jpg


Digital Cameras - Fujifilm FinePix A330 Digital Camera Review, Information, Specifications

Not making fun yaar i know peoples in Pakistan don't even use cameras much. But why do you need this 3.2 mega pixel camera? you can have this camera in your mobile phone too

Why need to hold a seperate camera?

I am a kind of camera guy so i kept changing my cams before but now since 2 years i have been using my 12mp& 10mp camera with greater zoom only. I don't really have to take so many pictures now so thats the cameras i am using for quite a while now
 
:woot:.........Probably 5D Mark3 with a body made out of gold. If its 5K USD, then chances are its 5D since its price comes around that range.

are u sure its a cam or is it a lense?



Nothing can beat Canon when it comes to SLR cams. I think Canon offers the right bang for the buck.

How true. I myself is a die hard fan of Canon.Canon rocks !!!! Canon Rules !!!

Nothing comes anywhere near Canon
 
How true. I myself is a die hard fan of Canon.Canon rocks !!!! Canon Rules !!!

Nothing comes anywhere near Canon

there was a time when Canon used to rule the photography market. Now there is a huge competition. Canon is no longer the best manufacturer with distinction. Its just one of the best manufacturers around.
 
Kidding me?
Its the most popular and successful model.

All fashion and Nat Geo photographers use this particular model.

i don't know much about this cam........... i just saw it first time here. I didn't like its design. Its weird :lol: but who cares about design........ i am sure it is going to produce a great quality picture :tup:
 
Not making fun yaar i know peoples in Pakistan don't even use cameras much. But why do you need this 3.2 mega pixel camera? you can have this camera in your mobile phone too

Why need to hold a seperate camera?

I am a kind of camera guy so i kept changing my cams before but now since 2 years i have been using my 12mp& 10mp camera with greater zoom only. I don't really have to take so many pictures now so thats the cameras i am using for quite a while now
i bought its way back. When people had nokia3310. :lol: The latest mobile was nokia mobile with still picture option. Forgot its model number. But i remember that it was the latest cell phone at that time.
 
Not making fun yaar i know peoples in Pakistan don't even use cameras much. But why do you need this 3.2 mega pixel camera? you can have this camera in your mobile phone too

Why need to hold a seperate camera?

I am a kind of camera guy so i kept changing my cams before but now since 2 years i have been using my 12mp& 10mp camera with greater zoom only. I don't really have to take so many pictures now so thats the cameras i am using for quite a while now

The thing is, the image result from a 3.2 MP of a cellphone and 3.2 MP from a digital camera are as differnt as a sheep and elephant.
 
The thing is, the image result from a 3.2 MP of a cellphone and 3.2 MP from a digital camera are as differnt as a sheep and elephant.

not much difference in cloudy or sunny weather.....almost same result. It only matters in night vision mode + zoom can also make a bit of difference

no other difference
 
wow 39mp thats huge

I can't believe that :disagree:

There must be some secret....... may be they changed the definition of Megapixel now :rofl:

And good to see Nikon best in comparison

oh my goodness.............. Phase One P45 camera is worth 37995 dollars :angry:

Well Mega Pixel is not everything in photography.

I prefer the aperture width, shutter speed range and ISO than MP as the scale to buy any camera.

5 MP is good enough for 21 inch, if you constantly print photos in large poster sizes then its an advantage

The other place where you need high MP is if you are shoddy with composition and needs to keep cropping out much without compromising the quality
 
Well Mega Pixel is not everything in photography.

I prefer the aperture width, shutter speed range and ISO than MP as the scale to buy any camera.

5 MP is good enough for 21 inch, if you constantly print photos in large poster sizes then its an advantage

The other place where you need high MP is if you are shoddy with composition and needs to keep cropping out much without compromising the quality
oh well you are right...... anything above 10mp is useless unless you want to frame a big picture in your house or you are photoshop guy who will play with pictures in photoshop.

but 5mp does not provide good results. It destroys the image quality when you take a snapshopt above 800x600 resolution. I know what 5mp means but its of no use to me
 
there was a time when Canon used to rule the photography market. Now there is a huge competition. Canon is no longer the best manufacturer with distinction. Its just one of the best manufacturers around.

Well, there was never a time when Canon dominated the market. The market was always been shared with Nikon, pentax, olympus and other brands.

The best part of Canon is the range of Lens to choose from, none other brand provides such a huge range.

Technically speaking Nikon was always the best, but there is a Canon fan followings and I am one of them :D
 
not much difference in cloudy or sunny weather.....almost same result. It only matters in night vision mode + zoom can also make a bit of difference

no other difference

well, in genral, the cell phone cameras need sufficiently lit enviornment to take photo, but most digi cams have somekind of mumbo jumbo mechanism to rectify such problems. besides, digi cams have more settings and options than cell cams to take a perfect snap.:taz:
 
Well, there was never a time when Canon dominated the market. The market was always been shared with Nikon, pentax, olympus and other brands.

The best part of Canon is the range of Lens to choose from, none other brand provides such a huge range.

Technically speaking Nikon was always the best, but there is a Canon fan followings and I am one of them :D

thats exactly what i am saying. There is a huge Canon Fan club and its followers are crazy. They don't trust any other cameras rather than Canon.

I have personally tried almost every single brand and trust me there is not a much difference in terms of picture quality. Canon dominated the market for its wide range of lens and ease of use.

Other compitors are also as good as canon in terms of quality. Its just upon the individuals choice but Canon used to have a huge number of followers before. Now peoples like to test all brands before buying the final product but still they prefer Canon as their first choice.

And Kodak is also not that bad :D
 
i don't know much about this cam........... i just saw it first time here. I didn't like its design. Its weird :lol: but who cares about design........ i am sure it is going to produce a great quality picture :tup:

1D has an excellent grip, the handling is awesome. Excellent one for heavier lenses.
 
Back
Top Bottom