one thing is common, they were all invaders
like I said
Ayatollah was not an invader
Neither was Idi Amin nor was Pol Pot
they left a lot of sad people behind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
one thing is common, they were all invaders
like I said
Haha seriously? Why are you even engaging his nonsense.
When logic fails, the PDF jihadi turns to tangential bullshit. Best to ignore the nonsense
I can't listen ....... I can read only.
Shits ........... well keep your shit to yourself buddy ....... why the hell you expect I will take any shit from you. Disgusting.
I hope you didn't break your keyboard typing these lies oops sorry your response, else you would blame me for that. You being on internet is evidence enough to confirm that you are telling a lie .... again.
Point is simple .......... Its the hometown of kid and he / she has all the rights to be anywhere he / she wants to be, its you who should stop telling lies and forcing your will on him / her.
Stop with lies buddy what's wrong with you?
Again responsibility lies with the one who is pulling the trigger. Why fire at the "protesters" when there are children in there, why would you come to defend an oppressing force and try putting blame on the victims? Why would you mask your true intentions as some humane concern when it is not? You are telling a lie when you do that. I have no interest in your character, it's an internet forum and you are telling a lie openly, so bear with the response ........
I'm actually wondering the same about you.
My sympathy is expressed as a parent.
As an Indian I owe no one any explanation.
Cheers, Doc
Not interested in your tangential nonsense.
Answer me this, would you take a child to the frontline during war? since you claim the child is allowed to go where it pleases, not withstanding the fact that it wasn’t the child’s decision to be there, it was the parents decision to bring him in harms way during a riot. If not, why not? And if you do and the child comes in harms way, whose fault is it?
Dude.
The child is a toddler from what I read somewhere.
18 months old.
You think he or she had a choice?
You think toddlers walk out of the house on their own?
I'm putting your question to you.
Why are you engaging?
Cheers, Doc
Not interested in your tangential nonsense.
Answer me this, would you take a child to the frontline during war? since you claim the child is allowed to go where it pleases, not withstanding the fact that it wasn’t the child’s decision to be there, it was the parents decision to bring him in harms way during a riot. If not, why not? And if you do and the child comes in harms way, whose fault is it?
If any civilian went to the hotel after the attack started and the police asked them not to go inside then yes they would be responsible for what happened to themWhy did the people go to railway stations and hotel on 26/11 ....... they should have stayed inside their homes, if they had they wouldn't have been killed, it's their fault. See how easy this is.
If any civilian went to the hotel after the attack started and the police asked them not to go inside then yes they would be responsible for what happened to them
Similarly any civilian who deliberately goes to an encounter site is responsible for what happens to her
Thats true.Ayatollah was not an invader
Neither was Idi Amin nor was Pol Pot
they left a lot of sad people behind
If any civilian went to the hotel after the attack started and the police asked them not to go inside then yes they would be responsible for what happened to them
Similarly any civilian who deliberately goes to an encounter site is responsible for what happens to her
Same shameless logic again, why i am not even surprised anymore.Get off your moral high horse and look at this situation objectively instead of being blinded by bias and hatred for Indians.
You want to push your narrative, go ahead, but don’t mask it as some inhumanity on part of the Indian armed forces when the blame for this kid being hurt solely lies on the parents who are irresponsible enough to expose a child to a rioting mob and the police measures to control them.
As a parent, it is their responsibility to ensure this child’s safety, aka take shelter or get the child away from such a situation, no matter how brave these Kashmiri parents think they are facing riot control police.
Or are you suggesting that it is routine for children, especially toddlers to show up at these riots/acts of vandalism on their own volition?
As sad as it is to see that this kid got hurt and trust me, no one(at least not me) wants to see a child of even an enemy come in harms way, but this is completely the fault of the parents who had no business exposing this child to danger. The child was not the target, but collateral damage. End of story.
If the question is, “what’s her fault”, the answer remains, being born to irresponsible parents who put their own child in harms way.
If you see it otherwise, thats your opinion and you’re entitled to it. I also give two shits about it. I stand by my statement.
Well surprised there are even Kashmiris alive given your assertion.
But yes, you’re right, Kashmiris using violence and terrorism to achieve their political goals are in harms way. No doubt.
And I see no reason why the Indian armed forces should treat a threat to the state and civilians from these violent Kashmiris less aggressively.
Trigger happy brainwashed terrorists hide among civilians. When army comes for encounter they make announcement.
Then brainwashed mullas start shouting from mosque loudspeakers to ask brainwashed ignorants to come and help the terrorists.
The army is actually showing lot of restraint. All these protesters must be arrested and thrown in jails 1000 km away so that they understand what happens to trouble makers
Any civilian living in an occupied region would never know when the trigger happy barbarians start shooting at civilians.
Basically, oppressing them!! They do not give refuge to freedom fighters, THEY ARE THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS!!No one is asking them to move
We are asking them to
1 stop giving refuge to terrorists in their homes
2 when an encounter is happening just stay inside the house and not go outside trying to disrupt the operation along with your toddlers in tow
You may call them freedom fighters we call them terroristsBasically, oppressing them!! They do not give refuge to freedom fighters, THEY ARE THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS!!
Still, it is really sad to see how extremist the Indian society have become under the current government and the hindutva mind set is so clear to see even on online forums!!
If any civilian went to the hotel after the attack started and the police asked them not to go inside then yes they would be responsible for what happened to them
Similarly any civilian who deliberately goes to an encounter site is responsible for what happens to her