Ignore?Most people in Zangnan/south tibet or whatever apart from the zealous lama buddhists will prefer China to even outright independence.So the question of Nagas doesn't arise at all.
So, tell me if I got this right so far.
1. Tanis and Nagas are very much alike. However, some differences exist.
2. You would like to see a separate country with them, which is approximately a 6 million strong population and comprises of parts of Nagaland and Arunachal.
3. Assam is totally a no-no. The same goes for Tripura and also Mizoram may be ? Funny thing, we have not talked but Meghalaya so far. You thoughts on that ? (The whole combined NE does not look all that combined all of a sudden now)
4. There are hundreds of other tribes in NE, but we don't know what they want.
5. The basis for unity is cultural similarities. Again, what may seem similar in a bigger set, always look more and more dissimilar in a smaller set. That's pure and simple Mathematics and Humanities.
Just a few questions on this culture thing.
A. Why do you think it is necessary to identify a nation based on a single culture ? Can it be done artificially ? Because if we look deep we will always find out, there will be subsets inside sets and bifurcations present ?
B. Is anybody/anything stopping you presently from practicing your culture ?
C. Any kind of exploitation ?
6. We have the China/South Tibet angle.
Most people would like to be a part of China. Question, why ? Cultural similarity this time as well ? I think not.
Okay, I'll assume you are correct. Although, the supporters of the Llama will disagree. But I believe, the Nagas got left behind with that idea ?
So, why don't you summarize one idea, a kind of good-to-have plan, and the objectives that you are achieving with the plan ?