What is Pakistan's Full Spectrum Deterrence doctrine?

[HRK]

Do not worry about India.
That India will be handicapped with no resources or any global relevance even if it survives nuclear war but please care about Pakistan that will it be there to see it or not.

In that case you should also not worried about Pakistan .... our survival or non-survival should not be an issue for India.

Yes it can happen if you would not stop yourselves from firing nuke missiles.
If you will stop yourselves then less people will survive if not the no people of Pakistan will survive courtesy to to nuclear triad.

As said earlier this should be least of your concern ... if war goes beyond the nuclear threshold it will have its implications & will take its toll (a heavy toll) from both parties we are PHYSIOLOGICALLY prepared to pay the price are you people prepared .... ??

IF Yes .... then take up the adventure MAY GOD BLESS THE REST

IF NOT .... then .... DETERRENCE ACHIEVED

Yes,
if you have missed the news then let me remind you that first N submarine is stated to be commissioned in 2018 but before it is commissioned the second submarine in same class will go for trials and till 2018 the clear picture of induction of K4 missile will be laid out which will cover whole of pakistan.

NO .... the catching word is 'will' ... & the tenure of that 'will' for India is not less than 5 year ....I rest my case ....

As you mentioned in your post that the next war will be nuclear war so that's why my response but I thought you had some information about current scenario of nuclear doctrine of both countries perhaps I was wrong.

Don't put your words in my mouth .... what I said is very much clear .... & I am posting it one more time

one can only plan to initiate it (WAR) but could not predict its end .... WAR WILL TAKE IT COURSE BY ITS OWN .... so do not make childish claims .... my keyboard warrior ....

 

[AUz]

Its fine if it let's you sleep tonight.
But we have a different view which is each passing day Pakistani is less confident of taking on India conventionaly,hence reducing the thresholds.

LOL, if THAT makes you sleep better at night and makes you forgot the humiliation of being contained by a 7x smaller nation militarily.

We saw how india backed down in 2002, talked loud in 2008 but didn't dare to do anything (other than sending few jets on the border..only to be locked-on by our fighter jets following an "escorted" retreat)..

So much for indian 'conventional' option....lol.

C'mon..you know it, and I know it..indian military isn't capable of doing anything to Pakistan---unless it is ready to face devastation at home front by our retaliatory strikes (nature of which can not be judged by our adversary, AS it SHOULD be the case )

 

[volatile]

Warmongering won't help.
I'm glad that your army and govt doesn't take this sentiment of some section seriously, for they know the perils of starting a nuclear war.
I don't think you understand the fact that Pakistan has a full spectrum deterrence policy, so it reserves the right to begin a nuclear war, in other words history would put the blame of sparking a nuclear on Pakistan if there's a nuclear war.
It is definitely not India's cowardness which lead it opt for a massive retaliation. If so, China would also be bracketed with India for coming up with No First use policy.
It's for the fledgling civilisations to opt for preposterous and aggressive nuclear policies. Not ours! Our's (China's and India's) history goes back to 10000 years and more.

History remmenber only heros and victors ,US nuked Japan who cares even Japs are best friend of US .So your arguments failed.In history there will be victors and there will be loosers ,harsh reality

 

[Levina]

in history there will be victors and there will be loosers ,harsh reality

But what is the guarantee that first nuclear strike would make Pakistan the victor of war???
India's massive retaliation on the other hand ensures that it would not stop till the enemy has ceased to exist.
BTW you and me are talking of a hypothetical war, right now what matters is that how does the world evaluate our nuclear policies?
India has a clear advantage for not adopting a policy which makes it sound like an aggressor, and it is consistent with our previous policies.

 

[chhota bheem]

LOL, if THAT makes you sleep better at night and makes you forgot the humiliation of being contained by a 7x smaller nation militarily.

We saw how india backed down in 2002, talked loud in 2008 but didn't dare to do anything (other than sending few jets on the border..only to be locked-on by our fighter jets following an "escorted" retreat)..

So much for indian 'conventional' option....lol.

C'mon..you know it, and I know it..indian military isn't capable of doing anything to Pakistan---unless it is ready to face devastation at home front by our retaliatory strikes (nature of which can not be judged by our adversary, AS it SHOULD be the case )

For all your ,the bold part remember we made you 7 times smaller than us.

Atleast you should have asked your History teacher,master master you teach us we have won the wars with India and India is scared of us,but in the geography class teacher first showed us bigger map for 1947 and as the years passed the size because smaller ????

 

[fatman17]

360* coverage besides if I told you, I would have to K**l you.

 

[I M Sikander]

In my considered opinion,it will always a joint decision headed by Prime Minister who is the Chairman of NCA.In matters as critical as this, consensus is what guides decisions.and it would be presumptuous to believe that the Chief alone would have the codes.

Having codes is one thing and the authority to use weapon is other matter.
Generals are not insane to give a go ahead for a nuclear strike in case of war with out having detailed discussion and administrative go a head by the PM and presidency.

 

[volatile]

India has a clear advantage for not adopting a policy which makes it sound like an aggressor, and it is consistent with our previous policies.

Well India always play a victim role but on the other hand piling up weapons it is equivalent to Nuke Bomb.We dont have any option or you guys dont let us have any option

 

[45'22']

Well India always play a victim role but on the other hand piling up weapons it is equivalent to Nuke Bomb.We dont have any option or you guys dont let us have any option

India is the lowest spender in defence as per GDP percentage in Asia ......Do you expect India not to spend at all ???

 

[I M Sikander]

Do not worry about India.
That India will be handicapped with no resources or any global relevance even if it survives nuclear war but please care about Pakistan that will it be there to see it or not.

You also better stop worrying about pakistan. We know how to handle india, and we are doing it quiet well. Indians cant see beyond pakistan. We enjoy the Pakistan centric attitude of indians.
war jingoistic kids, thinks they will enjoy nuclear war on cnn and bcc like first gilf war. Auch kids needs to grow up.

Yes it can happen if you would not stop yourselves from firing nuke missiles.
If you will stop yourselves then less people will survive if not the no people of Pakistan will survive courtesy to to nuclear triad.

With more number of nukes than india and better missile delivery system, your childish wishes to annihilate pakistan is nothing nore than a mental masturbation.

Grow up kid.

 

[Levina]

Well India always play a victim role but on the other hand piling up weapons it is equivalent to Nuke Bomb.We dont have any option or you guys dont let us have any option

This...is called playing the victim card.
And btw there was a report recently that said Pakistan would have the third-biggest nuclear stockpile within a decade. Nobody is an angel here.
Will Pakistan Soon Have the World’s Third-Largest Nuclear Arsenal? | The Diplomat


I had read this somewhere...
“If you are faced with a mountain, you have several options.

You can climb it and cross to the other side.

You can go around it.

You can dig under it.

You can fly over it.

You can blow it up.

You can ignore it and pretend it’s not there.

You can turn around and go back the way you came.

Or you can stay on the mountain and make it your home.”

 

[volatile]

Do remmember largest poor population i guess in world is based in India around 500 Mil .

India is the lowest spender in defence as per GDP percentage in Asia ......Do you expect India not to spend at all ???

 

[HRK]

If we look in the past then all the wars have been started Pakistan.

ya in 1947 when Pakistan not even had Armed forces ..... even for self-defence

& In 1971 Pakistan was fighting to capture Calcutta ....

The next war will also be started by Pakistan in its quench to liberate Kashmir just wait and watch.

propaganda victim..... sorry to say ...

Then you can consider all options open.

Options are always remain open its the PRICE associated with them make the decision difficult ...

If you consider WILL as a relief for your country then I rest my case my friend.
And if you think that it will take 5 years than you are not really updated and the surprising part which people here forget is that India has one Russian submarine being leased.
What do you think that after fishing its lease India will not purchase it?
It won't let go of that submarine and will act as a force multiplier along with other submarines.

India got Russian Nuclear subs just today or what, is it a new factor .... ?? if not why India has not 'purchased' the under discussion Nuclear sub till now ... ??

BTW plz elaborate the 'current role' of these sub in Indian Navy ....

I am not pputing any word into your mouth do read what you claimed in your previous posts.

your comprehension issue really sucks, I was (& is) very clear whatever I posted previously in this thread ....

 

[45'22']

Do remmember largest poor population i guess in world is based in India around 500 Mil .

The amount which is spend on poverty alleviation and health care is more than the amount we r spending on defence.......

Besides all of south Asia(India,Pakistan,Bangladesh) has similar poverty problems and we are spending the lowest of all on the defence

 

[war&peace]

I was expecting them to announce Nasr-2. But for some reason they didn't.

What would be specifications of such a missile?

FSD is a great step up from minimum deterrence by our strategists and planners. The authority to use a tactical nuclear missile like NASR can be relegated to the appropriate commanding officers in case of an massive movement towards Pakistan border to wipe out the herds of dogs (indian army personnel), tanks and/or artillery. This doctrine will hopefully provide stability to the subcontinent despite hawkishness of stupid indians. They have wet dreams of using cold start but that has been foiled and thrown in the trash bin with the induction of rapid response tactical nuclear weapons like NASR.