You're just going round and round, yet ending up utterly unable to defend her.No, the short clip doesn’t prove that she is ignorant about Malaysian politics. Her not mentioning bumiputra in that short clip does not mean that she is ignorant about it.
No, she just suggested that for investors some how magically Malaysia or Vietnam is a more lucrative compared to China at the moment.She also doesn’t mention that Vietnam is a single party authoritarian state, so can I conclude that that she is ignorant about that fact? No, everyone knows that fact. Her not mentioning it in that short clips does not entails that she is ignorant about our one party system. And what you’ve said in the first reply is no secret, especially to regional observers.
You're the one using a sound bite to build your whole case, and I am the one who must debunk her BS, which I already did in the context on her comment on Malaysia and the status of TPP in particular.She may indeed be ignorant about it, or maybe not. The onus is on you to prove that she is, since you were the one who have made that claim. And those short clips does not prove anything whether she is ignorant of it or not. So where is your proof that she is ignorant of Malaysian politics?
Did you read my post? I said VN has no advantage over Malaysia in terms of infrastructures, workforce, etc. Everyone knows this.
So why did she said VN will have more adavantage in attracting investors than Malaysia (other than lower wage)? my suggestion was that she knows something about your current messy internal politics.
You're again going round and round, I answered what she implied and what you choose to run with.
When did I said VN will become an Asian giant within 1 year?
This is utterly a strawman. And you wasted your time adding comments on top of this strawman.
Straw man is the word of the day for you it seems. I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of VN claims.
No, I dont have to provide any defense. I only reposted her comments.
Strange, yet here you are defending what she said.You were the one that claimed that she is ignorant about Malaysian politics ans insinuated that she is biased. So the onus is on YOU to provide arguments to back up these claims.
You may be a PhD, or you maybe not. The difference here, is that I can verify her PhD degree from reputable sites while you are claiming to be a PhD anonymously on a forum.
Btw, I’m a nobel peace prize laureates.
So I should send you a copy of my Ph.D degree, so you can verify that indeed I hold one. But that is beside the point to you her comments are valid because of her degree, completely overlooking the weakness of her argument or lack of fundamentals of Malaysian and regional situation or she is choosing intentionally to make such comments.
I am happy for your noble price.