What does China think about Kashmir. My POV

[saadee]

Kids will always be kids.

Why couldn't rest of other powers who were in support of you could have vetoed your position?

Your neurotransmitters are not kicking in. How many counties have power of veto? Try to figure it out and what happens when one member veto against the proposal? Who needs to use the brain here?

 

[PoKeMon]

Weren't the Chinese sent fighter jet, small arm, artillery to Pakistan during 1965 war? China wasn't an arm exporter in 1969, China provided Pakistan military support without a strong military export industry.

The chinese support for Pakistan in each and every Indo-Pak war has always been tokenism rather than anything substantial.

In 1965, I am not aware of any fighter jets being provide by China to pakistan. At that time PAF was superior and already scoring better on IAF.

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

Obviously you can't prove it over webcam, because you're almost certainly lying.

I hope you get arrested for pretending to be a member of the US state department. Impersonating a US federal official.

Do you know how absurd you sound and frankly also creepy- that after being called out on being inattentive to what I originally posted - you are now on this webcam fetish tirade?

Have a nice day.

 

[PoKeMon]

Your neurotransmitters are not kicking in. How many counties have power of veto? Try to figure it out and what happens when one member veto against the proposal? Who needs to use the brain here?

Quote me an instance where your so called supporter have bring in resolution in support of you and Russia veto that in support of India.

Kid - get on to your homework.

Also your response on Azad Kashmir is awaiting.

 

[ranjeet]

there is no other rights than fundamental rights given by the constitution of India.
My response to the biggest joke of the century. Get it?

What ever floats your boat.

 

[Lord ZeN]

Can you prove you were a member of the US state department?

Like I offered to prove my identity as a Hong Konger with Chinese citizenship to the forum Administrators via webcam (I always keep my ID documents in my wallet, like everyone should do). Five minute webcam chat, easy.

Since you know falsely claiming to be a member of the US state department is a criminal offence?



Looks like a lot of us have noticed that.

There are plenty of good American members here, who take the American point of view, like my friends LeveragedBuyout and Svensvensonov.

But this supposed "US state department" guy talks 100% like an Indian, and takes the Indian position in every post I have seen from him, as you yourself noticed.

I think he is an American of South Asian origin. I initially thought he was a pakistani - American. He was initially giving a lot of pro- Pakistan views.

 

[KingMamba]

There is not going to be war unless we see another 26/11. Which if it were to happen, would mean Pakistan would be heavily sanctioned and isolated. Even then, it will be a limited engagement ( mini war), and there is no chance of Pakistan using any nuclear weapons because of the limited nature of the engagement.

There is only one way for both countries and most importantly for Pakistan to get back to being economy focused and successful. That is accepting current boundaries.

I've had this discussion a hundred times with different people in different governments. Sixty plus years = statute of limitations has expired.

This thing has run its course.

I hope you are not serious with this statement. Statute of limitations only applies in common law states and has nothing to do with international disputes, not to mention statute of limitation usually has to do with criminality. In fact the only time statutes of limitation is mentioned in terms of international law is to say that it does not apply for international crimes such as genocide, etc. Of course I may be mistaken so please expand on your point.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Do you know how absurd you sound and frankly also creepy- that after being called out on being inattentive to what I originally posted - you are now on this webcam fetish tirade?

Have a nice day.

Enjoy prison.

I think he is a American of South Asian origin. I initially thought he was a pakistani - American. He was initially giving a lot of pro- Pakistan views.

Yep everyone here seems to have noticed it.

 

[Dash]

The chinese support for Pakistan in each and every Indo-Pak war has always been tokenism rather than anything substantial.

In 1965, I am not aware of any fighter jets being provide by China to pakistan. At that time PAF was superior and already scoring better on IAF.

Most of the Pak posters fail to understand that, its not Chinese support, but Chinese "Interest".

 

[saadee]

So anything that the US, UK and France do is now considered the act of G-d. I though they were the 'Evil' West.

As for your non-stop rants over Samjhauta Express blast.
Refer this
Outrage over Lakhvi but not Swami Aseemanand?

I would refer you to do some search on your own home minister SUSHIL SHARMA who unfold the actual face of RSS terrorists.O boi! Somebody really pulled a sensitive nerve. Reality hurts isn't it? Like I mentioned earlier that you guys believe only on "It's your fault by disregarding that your own backyard is dirty".

 

[PoKeMon]

Do you know how absurd you sound and frankly also creepy- that after being called out on being inattentive to what I originally posted - you are now on this webcam fetish tirade?

Have a nice day.

Ignore him. You are not the first one he is asking for web cam chat. Other members have been targeted as well.
He has a fetish for identity proof, he believe every one is as free and useless that proving their identity on internet is the only thing left in this world.

 

[Foggy_Bottom]

Lol by saying China does not support Pakistan's position you are implying support for India because all India asks is for other countries not to support Pakistan's position. Beyond that India does not ask for other countries to recognize Indian stand on kashmir as it considers it a done deal that does not need external recognition and considers anything further on the part of third parties as an affront to its sovereignty and in violation of the shimla agreement between India and Pakistan.

SO you have no quote claiming the exact charge you levied on me, just your vivid imagination. Thank you.

 

[The Great One]

I would refer you to do some search on your own home minister SUSHIL SHARMA who unfold the actual face of RSS terrorists.

LOL You mean Sushil Kumar Shinde. So much for research. All your rants have been answered troll, Go home.

 

[Judge]

Petition your lawmakers to build a wall of fire between India and Pakistan. That should keep us out.

Is this your immature answer?

No. He is right.
India is putting its money where its mouth is. India has spent and is spending billions of dollars on walling and fencing the border with Pakistan for just one single reason - that no Pakistani is able to enter India.

Similarly, should not the Pakistani Govt/Army put its money where its mouth is - and also build walls and fences to keep Indians out.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

@Horus - The above is a valid and critical argument to any plebiscite taking place on Pakistan's side of Kashmir, and as you've suggested.

It can't happen on your side with any legitimacy because a portion has been handed off to China.

Does that make sense, my friend?

conflicts are easy to create for any geniune or fake reasons if you noticed recent wars.. Pak and india is biggest war zone on Kashmir, if people or world chose to close their eyes not our fault.. we Pakistani doesnt really care what people think Kashmiri s are deying everyday and occupied by foreign army. why they need 600 thousands army men in kashmir alone they cant handle uprising with in Kashmir.
Desputed area needs to be resolved with Kashmiri's will, not between Pak and Ind will decide their future,
which matter UNO solved so far anyways,
due to all respect my retired agent it was better for you to stay quite.