What's new

What caused overpopulation in Pakistan?

But Saudi Arabian Extremism is state controlled unlike Pakistani Shutar bemahaar where any mullah from any street can incite people with whatevee interpretation they want. Its not even sects anymore. Every Organization or jamaat is indipendent. There is a massive difference between Mullaism in countries like Saudia and Iran Compared to "Shutar Be Mahaar" Mullah of Pakistan. They wont allow there clergy speak anything against there state interest.
Good luck finding Irani Mullahs that support Azerbaijan against Armenia Despite Azerbaijan being 85% Shia.

Also try fundings Saudi Mullah giving sermons against Saudi Govt for there operations in Sunni Yemen.

This bemari is only found in Pakistan.

Dont give them a discount over this. People start calling you having "Lack of Faith" "Secular" even Nafarmaan of Rasuul SAW even if you try to bring this discussion of controlling number of children. Lady Health workers are being shot at even in Big cities like Karachi. This mentality is all thanks to Mullahs and not Fertile lands unfortunately.

Fertile lands were responsible for baby boom across the world in 50s 60s. But 70s 80s generations around the globe became aware and controlled the population. China USA hell even Bangladesh. All have checked growth rate from .3 to 1% There Fertile lands are still there. But our beloved homeland Pakistan. Salute
Mullah is the biggest cancer on islamic civilization and need to be wiped out. Today we have harami mullahs going to afghanistan to negotiate with ttp!? If these mullahs had an ounce of dignity theyd never go and curse the military for not bombing these takfiris to hell.

These cancerous mullahs have destroyed pakistan and islamic societies that is why saudi controls mullah by their balls and even iran knows how to control the mullah. But here in pak mullah is allowed to roam wild and free, its like letting boars into agrigulcural land. They will destroy anything mullah touches.
 
Immigration from Afghanistan, Azad Kashmir?

They pack large numbers of populations so it is expected.
 
Please have a little thought ,,,,

1659099515169.png
 
There is no over population in Pakistan.
These chors ghadaars wanna make believe that problem is with awaam not themselves.
F***** ghadaars walla
Take a look at India poverty & isolation compared to China rich middle class, wtf
 
As per my friend. Pakistan main greeb ky pass sirf kerny ko aik hi entertainment hy. Ab greeb Wo b Na kary tu kiya kary.
 
Population is not the issue. Corruption and mismanagement is the reason Pakistan is in this mess. China is a clear example how to take advantage of your population. Western countries allow foreigners to immigrate because they have low population growth and need man power to maintain and grow economically.

Look at Japan which is struggling with population growth and will have to revisit their immigration policies. We have the resources if they are properly managed to grow our economy and pull people out of poverty.
 
Population is not the issue. Corruption and mismanagement is the reason Pakistan is in this mess. China is a clear example how to take advantage of your population. Western countries allow foreigners to immigrate because they have low population growth and need man power to maintain and grow economically.

Yeah it's called the one-child policy. Otherwise China would be a third world hell-hole today.

Look at Japan which is struggling with population growth and will have to revisit their immigration policies. We have the resources if they are properly managed to grow our economy and pull people out of poverty.

Are you living in today's world?
Japan has almost a 100 million people less than Pakistan and going into decline. They had plenty of outside support to develop and hold a very delicate balance. If they're population was still growing, they'd be heading a similar path to Pakistan.

They're population has been declining since decades because they're climate has kept it's growth as a steady pace.
 
Yeah it's called the one-child policy. Otherwise China would be a third world hell-hole today.
And what did they do with that one child policy? They changed it and have you read articles on how this caused population imbalance. Now the alarm bells are going off in Beijing , they might not see the affect in short term but long term their growth will be affected.


Are you living in today's world?
Japan has almost a 100 million people less than Pakistan and going into decline. They had plenty of outside support to develop and hold a very delicate balance. If they're population was still growing, they'd be heading a similar path to Pakistan.

They're population has been declining since decades because they're climate has kept it's growth as a steady pace.

No one stopped Pakistan from getting outside help. The corruption and mismanagement scared companies away. When your own leaders are corrupt, why will anyone else help you.

If their population was growing , they wouldn’t have negative interest rate and economically would be growing. that is the reason they are giving incentives to Japanese couples to have more kids.

Population is the key to growth, look around the world. China vs India, similar population but corruption and mismanagement has kept India at bay. Even with corruption, their economy is growing.
 
And what did they do with that one child policy? They changed it and have you read articles on how this caused population imbalance. Now the alarm bells are going off in Beijing , they might not see the affect in short term but long term their growth will be affected.

No one stopped Pakistan from getting outside help. The corruption and mismanagement scared companies away. When your own leaders are corrupt, why will anyone else help you.

If their population was growing , they wouldn’t have negative interest rate and economically would be growing. that is the reason they are giving incentives to Japanese couples to have more kids.

Population is the key to growth, look around the world. China vs India, similar population but corruption and mismanagement has kept India at bay. Even with corruption, their economy is growing.

Fallacious arguing. China's population growth has become steady. India's is out of control. China is a bigger country than India with less density.

China's imbalance is because they did not lift it to 2 children sooner and 3 children later. Regardless, their imbalance is still a far better situation than if they had not implemented population control.

Comparing China to India is like comparing Europe to Africa.

Economic growth is not in any country's interest, only minimal sustainable growth is like Scandinavian countries where the cold climate has regulated their population growth, giving them an excellent standard of living.

Scandinavian countries are a classic example of how humans can live sustainably but that is because their populations are small.

Economic growth is an ecological imbalance and nature has always functioned on balance. Industrialization is destruction

India is the poorest country on Earth despite having the third largest economy. Small populations and sustainable economies are the best means to survive.
 
The root cause of human population growth:
 
More population does not support prosperity nor does more food production improve living standard. It just worsen the crisis:
 
Questions from an interview with Tim Flannery on population growth in Australia by Quantam magazine.
Reporter: Karina Kelly
Producer: Peter Kirkwood
Researcher: Owen Craig

Q: Why is it that you believe Australia, which has an area the same size as the United States, can't support a similar sort of population - hundreds of millions ?

Flannery: Really because the ecology of Australia is so different and so unique. Land size really has very little to do with the number of people you can support on it. Witness the Antarctic which is larger than Australia, and no one's suggesting in could even support a million people. The tiny island of Java which is very, very rich and fertile can support a hundred million. But Australia's ecology is very, very limiting.

Q: But what is it about the Australian landscape that makes it so unsuitable for supporting a larger population ?

Flannery: Well, Australia has by far the world's least fertile soils so that half is fertile and average as comparable soils overseas. It's just very old land. A very ancient landscape. The soils here are a fossil resource, they're millions of years old. And its very, very difficult to make a living from it. And you can see that in Australia today where our agriculture is in crisis. I mean 70% of our soils are degraded. The annual input of agriculture into the overall Australian economy is relatively declining and mining is taking its place so what we're doing is moving from the sustainable use of a renewable resource into exploiting a non-renewable resource which is mining, in a hope of continuing this growth. And that trend should be worrying for people.
 
Back
Top Bottom