No need to become a leader of the Muslim world. I don't think we even have the intention. And doing what you are proposing would likely get Bangladesh kicked out of Ummah.Figure it out: if Bangladesh recognized Israel before the states you name then Bangladesh would become a leader in the Muslim world. Wouldn't "influence" follow?
Even westerns have mullahs and they hardly ever confront them. How can Bangladesh do it? No need to make the country unstable.Perhaps such mullahs have to be confronted if Bangladesh is going to be free and "Western" as the OP author desires. Would you feel good about winning such a battle?
People considers the Arabs superiors. So the policy of appeasing them is what people want.In the long run is it really in Bangladesh's best interest to slave its policy to the desires of Arabs rather than make a bold assertion of adherence to Western values and the hope of far greater prosperity?
And if the Arabs do expel their Bangladeshi workers isn't their a positive side? Aren't these the most enterprising citizens, the ones most willing to take risks? So as long as the red tape at home is kept to a minimum many of these guys will return with their foreign currency savings to start new businesses to earn a living, right? And won't that be a big boost to Bangladesh's economy?
And about economic boom, I'm sorry but it doesn't work that way in Bangladesh. These people mostly do manual labour work. They would most likely be unemployed upon returning.
And I think I have said things as clearly as I could. I don't wish to continue with this conversation. You can reply. But find someone else to debate please. If you have intention of debating.