What's new

We won't interfere in Kashmir imbroglio: US

shukla_swapnil

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
186
Reaction score
0
President Barack Obama's much respected National Security Adviser, Retd James L Jones made clear that while the President's new comprehensive strategy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan includes encouraging a rapprochement between India and Pakistan, it will absolutely not include any efforts to bring about a resolution of the Kashmir imbroglio.

Asked by a Pakistani journalist to expand on President Obama's remarks on a regional approach and how with what's going on with India and Pakistan if the US in encouraging talks between India and Pakistan, also hopes to encourage discussions on the Kashmir issue "to turn the heat down in the region so that Pakistan can focus totally on the war on terror," Jones said, "We don't intend to get involved in that issue."

"But, we do intend to help both countries have a -- build more trust and confidence so that Pakistan can address the issues that it confronts on the western side of the nation."

However, Jones, appearing at the Foreign Press Centre, reiterated emphatically, "But no, Kashmir is a separate issue. But we think that the times are so serious that we need to build the trust and confidence in the region, so that nations can do what they need to do in order to defeat the threat that I discussed a few minutes ago."

In his opening remarks, Jones declared that "the cornerstone of this strategy is that it's a regional approach. And for the first time, we will treat Afghanistan and Pakistan as two countries, but as -- with one challenge in one region."

He acknowledged that "our strategy focuses more intensely on Pakistan than in the past, and this is normal, because it's a newer problem, and this calls for more significant increases in US and international support, both economic and military, linked to performance against terror."

Jones said that 'we will pursue intensive regional diplomacy involving all key players in South Asia and engage countries in a new trilateral framework as -- at the highest levels of the countries, being Afghanistan, Pakistan and the United States. Together in this trilateral format, we will work to enhance intelligence sharing, military cooperation along the border, and address common issues such as trade, energy, and economic development."

He said, "As America does more, we will ask others to join us in doing their part. Together with the United Nations, the Administration will forge a new contact group for Afghanistan and Pakistan that brings together all who should have a stake in the security of the region -- our NATO allies and other partners, the Central Asian states, Gulf nations, Iran, Russia, India and China."

"All have a stake in the promise of lasting peace and security and development in the region," he added.

Also taking a hefty swipe at the foreign policy of the erstwhile Bush Administration, Jones said, "I trust that you have already -- in the 60 days since this Administration took its post -- that you've noticed a change in tone and a change in the conduct of American foreign policy."

"We're working very hard to bring a new level of dialogue and a new level of discussion and consultation with all of our allies and friends around the world," he said.

Jones asserted that "the United States is interested in listening. It's interest in, obviously, leading, but in partnering with countries around the world to confront common challenges. Afghanistan and Pakistan and the region certainly is one such challenge," he said.

We won't interfere in Kashmir imbroglio: US
 
However, Jones, appearing at the Foreign Press Centre, reiterated emphatically, "But no, Kashmir is a separate issue. But we think that the times are so serious that we need to build the trust and confidence in the region, so that nations can do what they need to do in order to defeat the threat that I discussed a few minutes ago."


Majority of Pakistan establishment need to understand this point. To solve the terrorist issue at hand.
 
Last edited:
Good that they dont try to push the Kashmir issue. It would be bad for Indo-US relations.
 
Good that they dont try to push the Kashmir issue. It would be bad for Indo-US relations.

Why will it be bad the Kashmiri's deserve thier right of self determination under the auspices of UN resolutions its long over due the sooner the better at least the core dispute will be resolved so we can focus more on the economy and make lives better.
 
We (Indians and Pakistanis) should't read too much into it. US obviously will participate in back-channel efforts, but will not publically acknowledge the same. This will keep both India and Pakistan happy that they are getting US to do what they want.

More importantly, this effort from US is also desierable as otherwise the Kashmir issue has become an impasse.

However both India and Pakistan has be careful in keeping the US participation just to the level of facilitation.
 
Indians always brag about how they free the people of East Pakistan from tyranny of West Pakistan than why not ask people of Kashmir to decide their fate???

Let them vote under international supervision to settle this disputed issue once for all if Kashmiri would like stay with India or be part with Pakistan or even separate homeland?

What say Indians????:smokin:
 
Indians always brag about how they free the people of East Pakistan from tyranny of West Pakistan than why not ask people of Kashmir to decide their fate???

Let them vote under international supervision to settle this disputed issue once for all if Kashmiri would like stay with India or be part with Pakistan or even separate homeland?

What say Indians????:smokin:

I am all for it as long as hundred and thousands Hindus and Sikhs that migrated due to terrorism in the valley and buddist in the ladakh region are allowed to vote. That will definetly change the vote count. :smokin:
 
I am all for it as long as hundred and thousands Hindus and Sikhs that migrated due to terrorism in the valley and buddist in the ladakh region are allowed to vote. That will definetly change the vote count. :smokin:

If they fled the scene than they aren't real Kashmiri? They don't love the land. They don't count.:wave::smokin:
 
If they fled the scene than they aren't real Kashmiri? They don't love the land. They don't count.:wave::smokin:

Do you know how redicolous you sound. Thier lives were on line, I am kind of discuseted by your statement.
 
Indians always brag about how they free the people of East Pakistan from tyranny of West Pakistan than why not ask people of Kashmir to decide their fate???

Let them vote under international supervision to settle this disputed issue once for all if Kashmiri would like stay with India or be part with Pakistan or even separate homeland?

What say Indians????:smokin:

You don't see the problem??
You are asking for the equivalent of interference from outside.

And separate homeland?!!
The support for this idea is tactical one by people, who after Bangladesh would live with separate Kashmir as long as it is India that looses or by those poor people who are made to believe that it is Indian policy to torture Kashmiris, so they should get out of India in any possible way.
They think of a certain bottom line which means "We loose nothing. Indians loose Kashmir" in terms of territory.

This mid way looks good on the outside. But look at the journey it takes. Firstly its almost impossible to achieve. Two countries have to relinquish their claim. But even after that do you think India and Pakistan will leave Kashmir alone?

And considering the leverage India has now, why will they want to loose anything for a piece of good will given that they already command a lot of soft power over the world?
 
Why do you live in US Al-Zakir? you are not real bangadeshi? Dont you love your land? :azn:
 
Last edited:
If they fled the scene than they aren't real Kashmiri? They don't love the land. They don't count.:wave::smokin:

they fled their lands because their muslim neighbors wanted them out...and wanted the non-muslims killed if they stayed...sitting in new jersey...your opinion doesnt count!
even the kashmiri hardliners admit pushing out kashmiri pandits was a blunder....they have apologised to the pandits who refuse to move back to kashmir!go study something about the plight of the kashmiri pandits before you type your nest post!
 
I am all for it as long as hundred and thousands Hindus and Sikhs that migrated due to terrorism in the valley and buddist in the ladakh region are allowed to vote. That will definetly change the vote count. :smokin:

Sorry, I forgot to add Jammu region.:D
 

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom