What's new

We Don’t Seek Benevolence, But Don’t Malign us Either – Part I

EagleEyes

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
16,774
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
We Don’t Seek Benevolence, But Don’t Malign us Either – Part I
By Xeric

Frankly speaking there wasn’t any need for this piece if certain readers had not taken umbrage at my previous blogs. First, where I explained why military-men are not superior to their civilian counterparts, and second when I shared a soldier’s thoughts on Eid.


However, some queries were raised in response to my blogs which were not in good faith. I even went against the grain and commented on my own blog so that misconceptions could be cleared.

I was successful to a certain extent only, and so I have decided to take it up a step further – after all the Army I serve in runs on a ‘hefty’ amount of the readers’ hard earned money.

However, I must clarify that by writing this piece I am in no way trying to present the Army as an infallible institution, nor am I trying to justify the mistakes it might have made in the past.

But then I do reserve the right to speak up against misplaced notions, fabricated figure work and ‘critical criticism.’

I for one have been a staunch believer that no one is superior by virtue of the power he holds, badges he wear or authority he possesses, nor he should be above criticism – the phrase holy-cow doesn’t exist in my dictionary. Nevertheless, I am also quite wary about someone trying to take undue advantage of one’s reticence.

It is said that personal examples are bad, but in order to further quantify the above statement I must tell you that I have never revealed my identity as a Fauji to anybody for the sake of gaining respect, in expectation of favours or to pressurize the other party. Every now and then I travel either by train, air, my personal vehicle, even by public transport while I proceed on leave, and interact with civilians in routine – ofcourse, this experience include the days when Army was genuinely respected.

I have been stopped by traffic police, even fined by them, made to stand in queue while baray log went past, and was even unnecessarily bothered by police while I had an after-dinner walk. All this, but I never have used my rank to influence the situation, why should I? I show my driving license and / or ownership papers when asked for, open up my trunk to allow search and wait for my turn when I am queued. Seriously, I don’t want to belittle myself because of such petty signals – a thing that I feed my under commands on a constant basis.

Having said this, the above ofcourse will only befit if the readers understand that for an individual’s folly, an entire organization or institution cannot be asked to take the blame. What Ayub, Yahya or Musharraf did must not reflect on the loyalty and dedication of remainder of uniforms – one shouldn’t paint the entire Armed Forces with the same brush. If that be case, then every German was a Nazi, all Jews are Zionists, every American an invader, and most important of all, we as Pakistanis are equally responsible for poor governance, corrupt politicians and ever worsening law and order situation.

Another thing that I must highlight before I begin my endeavour is the fact that soldiers are not aliens. Infact they hail from the same villages and cities, were schooled in local institutions as most Pakistanis, and have been brought up in a similar environment.

Moreover, most of the men and officers come from a humble background and thus contrary to the popular belief they lack a default gardan mai sariya (God Complex) attitude, which is so common to South Asian elites. Indeed, they possess the same amount of intellect, patriotism and sense of responsibility as their civilian counterparts do.

Lastly, the military has no system/desire to replace this attitude either – a fact I as a solider can vouch for (just so that you don’t take the wrong idea, I have been a soldier longer than I have been a civilian).

With this premise I shall now try to explain the obvious:

Army-men Receive Housing Units / Plots
Yes they do, but hear me out. They pay every penny for it.

To elaborate further, these can be divided into two broad categories, namely housing units in Army Officers Housing Scheme, and plots through Defence Housing Authority. Today we shall discuss the former.

Army Officers Housing Scheme (AOHS)

Housing is a basic and fundamental human need. Today, there is a virtual housing crisis in the country. Rapid population growth, overcrowding, shortage of supply, aging housing stock, development of slums and Katchi Abadis, and lack of financial resources has further aggravated the situation.

According to 1998 census, the total number of housing units throughout the country was 19.3 million. 67.7% housing was in rural areas and 32.3% in urban areas. The housing backlog, as estimated according to the 1998 census, was 4.3 million units. The additional annual requirement is estimated around 300,000 units, thereby, resulting in a recurring shortfall of 270,000 housing units annually.*

The situation is further compounded as 60% of the Army officers retire before 45 years of age; therefore, besides re-employment their biggest worry is to find a suitable shelter for their families after retirement as throughout their service they have been residing in rented accommodation. Apropos, Armed Forces – like any other organization – developed AOHS to provide its personnel with modern community living at affordable cost for the middle and low income groups, to which most of its employees belong.

AOHS is thus no different than any other housing scheme being managed in Pakistan. AOHS, like Federal Government Employees Housing Scheme, Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation, Police Foundation Housing Society, Pakistan Housing Authority, WAPDA City, State Life Insurance EmployeesCo-Operative Housing Society etc aims at providing their employees housing units on no-profit, no-loss basis.

Mechanism

The membership is voluntary. One can join in at any rank, though most memberships start early – the earlier you join, the less you have to pay in the end. A 2nd Lieutenant (2Lt) applies for the membership by depositing a down-payment, which increases for each next rank, amounting to anything between Rs 70,000 to 90,000. Of Course, at this stage of service one has to either take assistance from a bank or his/her parents to manage the down-payment. Once a member, the officer will pay monthly instalments until he retires or die during service as under (instalment rates and years of service have deliberately been altered for the obvious reasons):-

8144085732_55eefca7b6_z.jpg


Thus an officer retiring as a Lt Col had already deposited Rs 2.1 million. However, as the cost of house has yet not been recovered (you don’t get a house for 2.1 million these days), the remainder of the Rs 1.5 – 2.5 million is to be deposited in lump sum from pension benefits and Provident Fund to finally own the house.

Yes, the amount is still less as compared to its commercial value – construction on no-profit, no-loss basis, ‘vertical integration’, and the land was purchased atleast 10-15 years back. We call it good management, long-term planning and a stable market.

No, not a single penny is used from the defence budget.

Now let’s not get all gung-ho over it, as neither the concept nor the practice is alien to Pakistan.

Lastly, if a member embraces Shahadat, his remaining liabilities with respect to AOHS are waived off, which he damn well deserve!

Xeric's Primer: We Don’t Seek Benevolence, But Don’t Malign us Either – Part I
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do other members of society also have access to such provisions with similar terms?
 
Where does the Pakistani army have so much land in the first place? Does it have a program to acquire land for disbursement among its ranks? What is the land collection policy? I am honestly intrested to know.
 
Where does the Pakistani army have so much land in the first place? Does it have a program to acquire land for disbursement among its ranks? What is the land collection policy? I am honestly intrested to know.

I presume they would be getting land the same way the AHWO & AF& Naval housing organizations get in India only with less hassles.
 
Where does the Pakistani army have so much land in the first place? Does it have a program to acquire land for disbursement among its ranks? What is the land collection policy? I am honestly intrested to know.
BTW, what's your guess? Apart from snatching and grabbing land from poor Pakistanis, ofcourse you dont think the Army do that, right?

Here's how they actually do it:

Procurement of Land. A1 Lands of Army are not used by any DHA. All lands of DHA are procured from market through following measures:-

• Purchase Through Cash. Purchase of land on agreed upon price.
• Purchase Through Exemption. Purchase of land free of cost and develop the same giving 50% plots to the landowners.
• Combination of Cash and Exemption. Partial payment of price and suitable exemption.
• Purchase Through Award. Purchasing land through government upon payment of fixed charges.
 
Yaar land is one thing the Army needs some regulation on.

I am speaking strictly from an Indian perspective Xeric.
 
Do other members of society also have access to such provisions with similar terms?

If by 'members of society' you mean ordinary civilians doing their private businesses, then as we know that this procedure is to do something with institutionalization of the procedures, they dont have such provisions. Ofcourse they could get into any govt scheme at any time like that of Prime Minister Housing Foundation etc.

Now if you mean anybody working in the private sector, like in banks or privately owned large business, yes they too can avail such facilities if their Boss decides to 'institutionalize' it. Examples: WAK Gas Pakistan had such a scheme namely "Pak-Arab Housing Society", Allied Bank Pakistan has it, even State Bank of Pakistan has its own housing scheme namely "State Bank Co-Operative Society Ltd" , not to mention the impoverished Transportation Cooperation of Pakistan's housing society is visible here, right beside DHAs (Sui Northern Officers Co-Operative Housing Society Phase-1, State Life Housing Society Phase-1, HBFC Society, Punjab Small Industries Housing Society etc can also be seen):

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=RA+B...e,+Lahore+District,+Punjab,+Pakistan&t=m&z=14

Guess what, even VCheng can have his own a 'VCheng Housing Society' for his employees if he is generous and concerned enough to institutionalize purchase of land, construction of houses and then selling it off to his employees on no-profit, no loss basis :D
 
The original article contains all the links to the Housing Societies mentioned in my piece, you may want to look at them.
 
If by 'members of society' you mean ordinary civilians doing their private businesses, then as we know that this procedure is to do something with institutionalization of the procedures, they dont have such provisions. Ofcourse they could get into any govt scheme at any time like that of Prime Minister Housing Foundation etc.

Now if you mean anybody working in the private sector, like in banks, privately owned large business, yes the can too avail such facilities if the Boss decides to 'institutionalize' it. Examples: ..................

Guess what, even VCheng can have his own a 'VCheng Housing Society' for his employees if he is generous and concerned enough to institutionalize purchase of land, construction of houses and then selling it off to his employees on no-profit, no loss basis :D

Thank you for that response.

The reason I asked the question was to point out that on one hand, the OP states that "soldiers are not aliens. In fact they hail from the same villages and cities, have been schooled in local institutions as most Pakistanis, and been brought up in a similar environment" and then on the other goes on to justify the housing benefits accrued to them as part of military service, which would be fine if the rest of the society that gives rise to the soldiers is also able to enjoy similar securities.

The fact that such defense of Army's policies is a clear indication that increasing numbers of society feel left out to the extent of openly questioning the cossetting of the privileged ones. Unless these trends are arrested by delivering similar progress to the rest of society, breakdown is not far behind.

That, Sir, is my point.
 
Thank you for that response.

The reason I asked the question was to point out that on one hand, the OP states that "soldiers are not aliens. In fact they hail from the same villages and cities, have been schooled in local institutions as most Pakistanis, and been brought up in a similar environment" and then on the other goes on to justify the housing benefits accrued to them as part of military service, which would be fine if the rest of the society that gives rise to the soldiers is also able to enjoy similar securities.

The fact that such defense of Army's policies is a clear indication that increasing numbers of society feel left out to the extent of openly questioning the cossetting of the privileged ones. Unless these trends are arrested by delivering similar progress to the rest of society, breakdown is not far behind.

That, Sir, is my point.

They are employees of a institution, the institution (PA), provides them some after retirement benefits.

Now, the civil servants also get some benefits, private employees also get some benefits etc etc, so wouldn't they also be leaving out the rest of the society?

What do you suggest then? Army provides similar schemes to every citizen, to the whole society?

You are declaring every army officer a privileged one, which is far from the truth sir.
 
They are employees of a institution, the institution (PA), provides them some after retirement benefits.

Now, the civil servants also get some benefits, private employees also get some benefits etc etc, so wouldn't they also be leaving out the rest of the society?

What do you suggest then? Army provides similar schemes to every citizen, to the whole society?

You are declaring every army officer a privileged one, which is far from the truth sir.

I am merely observing that the privileges and perks, taken together, enjoyed by the military far exceed those available to a majority of society, and such a gap cannot be stable in the long term.
 
Thank you for that response.

The reason I asked the question was to point out that on one hand, the OP states that "soldiers are not aliens. In fact they hail from the same villages and cities, have been schooled in local institutions as most Pakistanis, and been brought up in a similar environment"
The OP is none other than the great Xeric himself :)

and then on the other goes on to justify the housing benefits accrued to them as part of military service, which would be fine if the rest of the society that gives rise to the soldiers is also able to enjoy similar securities.
The responsibility of providing same enjoyment to the 'rest of the society' is not that of the Army, but the govt.

No one stops the govt, Alla-din & Sons, Webmaster & Co or you from taking such initiatives. Ofcourse it involves A LOT of capital and even if a private company is willing for such an initiative, it may not be able to do so. Solution: well a thing known as Joint Venture. WAK Gas Pakistan did the same when it launched its Pak-Arab Housing Scheme. The 'Arab' is there for a reason :)

Also, if microsoft, google or British Petroleum doesnt do it for you (why should they, when they pay you instead), one should go take it up with them, rather getting envious of others doing something noble :azn:

The fact that such defense of Army's policies is a clear indication that increasing numbers of society feel left out to the extent of openly questioning the cossetting of the privileged ones. Unless these trends are arrested by delivering similar progress to the rest of society, breakdown is not far behind.

That, Sir, is my point.

Nah..nah....

There cant be any reason and any justification for questioning such initiatives if 1) No public money is involved, 2) The thing is transparent, 3) Land is not being grabbed, 4) No one is entering your turf.

Why would VCheng 'feel' if his neighbor is being provided with a house or a plasma through easy installments, especially if the company the dude serves in had used some brains and institutionalized the procedures, thus making it easy for its employees to get loans, or whatever?

The only other thing that comes in mind is 'jealousy.

But your definition, because Schlumberger provides its employees good food, so should my shop owner to me or else Schlumberger is evil, right?
 
I am merely observing that the privileges and perks, taken together, enjoyed by the military far exceed those available to a majority of society, and such a gap cannot be stable in the long term.
And thus the military is at fault here and therefore should be abused and maligned, right?
 
They are employees of a institution, the institution (PA), provides them some after retirement benefits.

Now, the civil servants also get some benefits, private employees also get some benefits etc etc, so wouldn't they also be leaving out the rest of the society?

What do you suggest then? Army provides similar schemes to every citizen, to the whole society?

You are declaring every army officer a privileged one, which is far from the truth sir.
He suggests that VCheng has gone all Communist now :rofl:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom