What's new

We are Pakistanis...

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
SRINAGAR: Hardline separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani on Monday demanded the merger of Jammu and Kashmir with Pakistan, as leaders of the moderate Hurriyat faction spoke about independence and a dialogue over the state.

Addressing a mammoth gathering at the tourist reception centre here, Gillani said there was "no solution to the Kashmir issue other than merger with Pakistan".

"We are Pakistanis and Pakistan is us because we are tied with the country through Islam," he roared, as the crowd cheered him and chanted: "Hum Pakistani hain, Pakistan hamara hai" (We are Pakistanis, Pakistan is ours).

Taking a dig at the moderate Hurriyat leaders who shared the stage with him, Gillani said the leadership issue of the Kashmiri separatist movement was "solved today".

"Do you have faith in my leadership? I will be faithful to you till my death and will carry everyone along," he said, as the crowd applauded him shouting in unison "zaroor" (certainly).

Srinagar streets on Monday danced to the tune of ‘‘jeeve jeeve Pakistan'' as frenzied youth chanted ‘‘teri jaan meri jaan, Pakistan, Pakistan'' and the Polo Ground resonated to the rhythm of ‘‘teri mandi, meri mandi, Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi''.

Hardliner Syed Ali Shah Geelani has every reason to be mighty pleased with the turn of events which marked the success of his efforts to put himself and his mentors in Islamabad back in the J&K equation just as they appeared to have been pushed to the margins.

But then came the twist. Giddy by the success of bringing secession back on the agenda, Geelani committed the indiscretion of coronating himself as the leader of the ‘azadi’ flock.

Quite a bungle it was. The boast pricked the sensitive egos of the rest in the secessionist choir and the rift became visible within no time, perhaps creating an opening for the government to try and salvage its chestnuts out of the fire. Geelani's unilateralism left the likes of Mirwaiz Umer Farooq, Yasin Malik and Shabbir Shah miffed and they left the scene without submitting the memorandum to the UN Military Observer's office, for which the march was called in the first place.

The strong bid to appropriate the ‘sadarat' of separatism, which has parties of myriad hues, was said to have sent others in quick meetings to hammer out their responses. ‘‘The chinks are there to see,'' said an analyst. Geelani sensed the resentment as he addressed a press conference in the evening to dub his ‘I am the sole leader of the tehreek' claim as a ‘‘slip of tongue''. He apologised, said the movement was bigger than the leaders and the struggle would continue, reposing faith in the coordination committee of Hurriyat factions.

If the octogenarian leader sought to make amends, it had already reduced the fourth show of strength since the Amarnath issue triggered a surge in sentiments in the form of march to UN office into a game in one-upmanship. Yasin Malik had walked out of the coordination panel's meet on Sunday at Geelani's residence by reportedly expressing reservations on the pro-Pakistan agenda being pushed by others.

The Hurriyat factions have been trying to put up a united face, having led campaigns like ‘Muzaffarabad chalo', mourning at Idgah for Sheikh Abdul Aziz who died in police firing and ‘Pampore chalo' on Saturday. Now, all eyes are on how the other components of the separatist camp take Geelani's apology. The separatists have already announced that the agitation would continue, rebuffing speculation that the march to UN could end the demonstrations which have brought Srinagar to a halt for over a month. On display on Monday was the fact that the fresh surge in ‘azadi' sentiment is driven by a religious rightwing tilt for across the border.
People came in droves, representing various walks of life, to submit memorandums to the UN Military Observer's office. They included the hotel association, Bar association, chambers of commerce and different mohalla committees. All mobilized under the separatist umbrella of Hurriyat Conference and Tehreek-e-Hurriyat of Geelani. Standing out in the massive show, however, were the frenzied youth from downtown areas, Hyderpura and other hubs of recent tensions.

While they provocatively invoked ‘‘Lashkar aayi, Lashkar aayi'' on their march, they later stood up in the park to give a thumbs down to the decision to open Srinagar for three days till Friday. Analysts called them a local constituency of religious rightwing which doesn't want any drop in momentum by relaxing the ‘hartal'. But the script took a twist as the leaders arrived on the scene. Hurriyat did not submit the memorandum to the UN office.

Meanwhile, leaders like Zafar Ahmad Butt of Salvation Movement and Javed Mir of JKLF, Shia cleric Agha Sayeed Hasan of Budgam, former APHC chief Abbas Ansari had already visited the UN office.

Mirwaiz, Malik and Shah, standing before a surcharged gathering, made their speeches. Mirwaiz announced: ‘‘Either the whole gathering will go to the UN office or we will not.'' Then came Geelani who delivered a sharp Islamist address and staked claim to the leadership while taking three pledges which included ‘‘I will take everyone along.''

His bid to nudge others out of the frame, aided by his supporters who struck higher vocal chords to make it a Geelani show, turned out to be a spoiler. The octogenarian could not complete his three pledges, drowned in sloganeering by people who got up midway to disperse. In an hour, Srinagar streets bore a deathly silence, as if nothing had happened.
We are Pakistanis, says Syed Geelani-India-The Times of India
 
.
This issue is one of the oldest issues before the UN. It should be solved according to the UN resolution so that the suffering of the people of Kashmir can end.
 
.
Pro-Indian parties toeing pro-freedom line in Kashmir
By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: Pro-Indian political parties in Indian-held Kashmir are joining their pro-freedom counterparts.

The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which has a pro-Indian stance, recently joined a march of pro-freedom political parties to Muzaffarabad.

The National Conference (NC), another pro-Indian party, called for a debate on ‘azadi’ (freedom) on Friday.

In an interview to CNN-IBN, NC President Omar Abdullah said, “If opinion makers across the country are talking about azadi, let’s bring it on the table. Let’s … talk about the azadi of the entire state of Jammu and Kashmir. Let’s talk about the United Nations resolutions.”

“If that is the way forward, let us not shy away from it. I know which way I am [going to] turn,” he added.

Omer also called for a dialogue to solve the Amarnath land row crisis.

Recently, he blamed New Delhi for the worsening law and order in the state and threatened to resign from parliament if excessive force was used on Kashmiri protestors.

Omer’s father and former Kashmir chief minister Dr Farooq Abdullah on Wednesday rejected the idea of freedom. “It is a question of survival. And therefore, I don’t think it is very good to think that we can remain free. The question is, can we survive free? It is not about survival as a destroyed state, but survival as a state, which is viable, where people can exist happily,” he told reporters.


Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
. .
I wouldn't mind Kashmir becoming Free and Independent state. Neither Pakistani, Indian.

The only solution.
 
. . .
he is irresponsible and jobless as well
so we wants both job (leadership-with power)and responsibility by creating a new country
by sending all kashmiris to world's most troubled part.
if he does it today , 10 yrs from now, al qaida-taliban will say they are kashmiris as well.
so,more trouble to kashmiri people by a bunch of hurriyats.




SO you say that millions and millions of Kashmiris are irresponsible whom the Indian occupying brutal army is killing daily.

And your Indian brutals are responsible right ?
 
.
I wouldn't mind Kashmir becoming Free and Independent state. Neither Pakistani, Indian.

The only solution.

Given the geopolitical reality of the region, an independent Kashmir would be too small to defend itself from powerful and hostile neighbours like India, Pakistan and China. Additionally, the United States may wish to utilize Kashmir as a strategic location to monitor its own interests.

Sorry . . . an independent Kashmir will only be a source of more conflict and tension in the region. This part of the world does not need another Georgia or Kosovo.

The only sensible solution for Kashmir is a union with Pakistan . . . it would accord with all the necessary factors of international law, culture and security.
 
. . .
Given the geopolitical reality of the region, an independent Kashmir would be too small to defend itself from powerful and hostile neighbours like India, Pakistan and China. Additionally, the United States may wish to utilize Kashmir as a strategic location to monitor its own interests.

Sorry . . . an independent Kashmir will only be a source of more conflict and tension in the region. This part of the world does not need another Georgia or Kosovo.

The only sensible solution for Kashmir is a union with Pakistan . . . it would accord with all the necessary factors of international law, culture and security.

This is the last & worst case option. The implications are hard even to imagine.

The LC should be converted to an IB.
 
. .
Anti-India sentiment grows amid Kashmir unrest


By AIJAZ HUSSAIN and MATTHEW ROSENBERG, Associated Press Writers
Fri Aug 22, 12:14 PM ET



SRINAGAR, India - The crowd's hostility was unmistakable. Each time they passed Indian soldiers, thousands chanted the name of one of South Asia's most violent Islamic groups.



"India, your death will come. Lashkar will come," they chanted, harking back to the early 1990s when militants from groups like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba roamed this predominantly Muslim region's towns and villages and even Kashmir's peaceful separatists openly defied New Delhi.

Those days seem more like the present than the past in Kashmir, where a dispute over 99 acres of land for a Hindu shrine has prompted protests by hundreds of thousands, reviving the separatist movement and threatening to further undermine the India-Pakistan peace process.

While the militants may still be underground, a new generation of Muslim Kashmiris has loudly taken up the separatists' old slogan of "azadi" — freedom — from Hindu-majority India, long viewed by many here as an occupying power.


The latest and largest protest came Friday as an estimated 200,000 people streamed into central Srinagar, shutting down this city once famed for its cool summer weather and sweeping Himalayan panoramas.



They chanted "Death to India!" and "We want freedom!" while soldiers and police kept their distance, hoping to avoid a repeat of clashes that have killed at least 34 people in recent weeks.



Such scenes have pierced the notion, widely held throughout India just months ago, that a semblance of normal life was returning to Kashmir after 19 years of rebellion. Militant attacks were down, separatist politicians appeared sidelined and tourists were back lounging on houseboats on Srinagar's Dal Lake.

That is all gone now, pushed aside by the anger at Indian rule that many here say was subsumed but never extinguished.

"This is a freedom movement, a people's movement," said Salman Ahmed, a 27-year-old protester. "We are united to fight India until we get freedom."
The timing could not be worse. Divided between India and Muslim Pakistan, Kashmir lies at the heart of their rivalry. The unrest is straining already tense relations between the nuclear-armed neighbors, who have fought two wars over Kashmir.

Statements from Islamabad supporting the protesters have prompted angry responses from New Delhi. They've also raised suspicions of a Pakistani hand in the unrest, reflecting India's belief that recent political turmoil in Pakistan is allowing hawkish elements there to renew the struggle against India after four years of peace talks.

Such fears are being stoked by repeated skirmishes along the heavily militarized LoC that divides Kashmir — each side blames the other — and the bombing of India's embassy in Afghanistan, an attack New Delhi charges was orchestrated by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency. Islamabad vehemently denies the allegations.

One top Indian security official, A.K. Mitra, chief of the paramilitary Border Security Force, recently told reporters that the ISI plans to use the unrest to sneak 800 Islamic militants into Kashmir.

But on the streets of Kashmir, it is India's continued claim to the region — and the presence of an estimated 500,000 Indian soldiers — that is seen as the problem.
"We are a separate people, we were never part of India," Shabir Hussain, a 30-year-old protester in Srinagar, said Friday.

It's a widely shared sentiment, and its roots can be traced to 1947, when Britain gave independence to its Indian colony by dividing it into largely Hindu India and overwhelmingly Muslim Pakistan.

Kashmir, then technically a British protectorate and not a part of colonial India, was caught in the middle. Its Hindu king insisted he wanted to remain independent, dithering until tribal raiders attacked from Pakistan. When he asked New Delhi for help, there was a steep price: union with India.

War broke out between India and Pakistan, and the verdant Kashmir valley, the region's heart, ended up under Indian rule.

In the ensuing decades, separatist movements ebbed and flowed in Indian Kashmir, where the sight of soldiers on patrol became part of everyday life, fueling resentment.

Most of the separatist movements were peaceful until 1989, when Islamic insurgents took up arms hoping to win independence for India's part of Kashmir or see it merged with Pakistan. The rebellion has killed an estimated 68,000 people, most of them civilians.

Few Kashmiris blame the militants for the deaths.

"The Indian army has unleashed a reign of terror in Kashmir," said Nissar Ahmed, a 35-year-old government worker. "This is a reaction and response to their atrocities."


The spark for the latest unrest was a plan to transfer land to the Amarnath shrine — a cave to which millions of Hindu pilgrims flock every year to see a phallic-shaped icicle revered as an incarnation of Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction and regeneration.

Authorities said bathrooms and shelters for the devotees were going to be built on the land. But Muslims alleged the land transfer would alter the religious balance in the region, comparing the move to Israeli settlements in the West Bank and prompting authorities to scrap the plan.

That, in turn, sparked protests in Jammu, the region's only Hindu-majority city, which were countered by more protests in Muslim-dominated areas such as Srinagar.

While Hindus are still protesting in Jammu, it is the Muslim demonstrations that have taken center stage, threatening India's grip on its only Muslim majority state.

"The peace process between India and Pakistan failed to change the ground situation in Kashmir," said Noor Mohammed Baba, a professor at the University of Kashmir.

"Now this festering wound is manifesting itself on the streets. This is a mass uprising and in many ways more serious and comprehensive than the early 1990s."

___

Associated Press writers Aijaz Hussain reported this story from Srinagar and Matthew Rosenberg from New Delhi.



Anti-India sentiment grows amid Kashmir unrest - Yahoo! News
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom