What's new

We are a part of India: Bangladeshi finance minister Mustafa Kamal

This is the revenge of the Two Nation Theory as described in the KITAP!! On the Roz-i Hashr the entire mankind will be resurrected and divided into two camps - Muslimin and Mujrimin (criminals)!!! If the KITAP goes against you, May GOD help for you’re doomed....
The spirit and letter of the two-nation theory are surviving only in Bangladesh with the absence of religious fanaticism. It was Jinnah's dream to make the two-nation theory put into practice by developing the country which BD is successfully doing. But, what is happening to your Wahabi country in India's west? Only asking for loans, credits, and oil credits.

Your inability to build the country is making India smile, a big smile at that. Guys like you do not want a developed Pakistan, because then the big Fatwabaz Mullahs like you there will remain hungry.
 
you should have chosen farsi as national language then, urdu is a north indian language. Adopting urdu made pakistanis closer to indian culture and addicted to bollywood. strategic blunder choosing urdu.


There are Pakistanis who speak Farsi, especially in South West Pakistan. The morbid fascination with bollywood is actually dying out in Pakistan. Urdu is in fact indigenous to conterminuous Pakistan. It has nothing to do with Northern india.
 
Pakistan WAS NEVER A PART of india, it was A PART of the of the BRITISH RAJ which ruled modern day Pakistan, india, bangladesh, Myanmar etc. Most of modern day Pakistan was a part of the Safavid Persian empire for over 800 years. Once the British and others defeated them, they forced Pakistan to become a part of the British Raj for just over 90 years. Please get your facts right before spewing propaganda.
In case you didn't read.

@Indus Pakistan
 
The spirit and letter of the two-nation theory are surviving only in Bangladesh with the absence of religious fanaticism. It was Jinnah's dream to make the two-nation theory put into practice by developing the country which BD is successfully doing. But, what is happening to your Wahabi country in India's west? Only asking for loans, credits, and oil credits.

Your inability to build the country is making India smile, a big smile at that. Guys like you do not want a developed Pakistan, because then the big Fatwabaz Mullahs like you there will remain hungry.
You make some valid points.
 
@Dubious @waz its quite evident that he used these words "was" "were"...so whats wrong in here??wouldnt we belong to the same country before 1947??beside,this poster continuosuly sharing some nonsense thread which creating troll fest..

keep twisting, change grammatical rule, re-arrange punctuations...if needs be remove a word or two
but you are a part of India! like husband and wife (rings bell?)
 
Pakistan WAS NEVER A PART of india, it was A PART of the of the BRITISH RAJ which ruled modern day Pakistan, india, bangladesh, Myanmar etc. Most of modern day Pakistan was a part of the Safavid Persian empire for over 800 years. Once the British and others defeated them, they forced Pakistan to become a part of the British Raj for just over 90 years. Please get your facts right before spewing propaganda.
India itself was never a united country, diverse people were ruled under different empires at different points in time. As much you say Pakistan was under the Persians, the same way it could be said it was under India during Mughal rule.

anyways on topic, why is the fuckwit dwelling on the past? 71 chetona was bearable but this nigga went back to dwell on a time of empires. If this chutiya can become finance minister from sports... then god help us
 
The spirit and letter of the two-nation theory are surviving only in Bangladesh with the absence of religious fanaticism.

But, what is happening to your Wahabi country in India's west?


Guys like you do not want a developed Pakistan, because then the big Fatwabaz Mullahs like you there will remain hungry.

You have some stereotypes about Pakistan which are simply not factual.

Your inability to build the country is making India smile, a big smile at that.

Many smiles after we shot down two planes in Feb, blocked airspace, trade to Central Asia, and revealed RSS plans at the UN.

As much you say Pakistan was under the Persians, the same way it could be said it was under India during Mughal rule

We consider ourselves the descendants of Dilli Sultanat, Ghaznavi, Ghori, Mughals, and Durranis.

India has disowned its Muslim past, while we celebrate it.
 
India itself was never a united country, diverse people were ruled under different empires at different points in time. As much you say Pakistan was under the Persians, the same way it could be said it was under India during Mughal rule.

anyways on topic, why is the fuckwit dwelling on the past? 71 chetona was bearable but this nigga went back to dwell on a time of empires. If this chutiya can become finance minister from sports... then god help us



How can it be under india if the Mughals were ruling it?.........:disagree:........it's like saying Australia was under Nigeria as both nations were both ruled by the British empire......:disagree:........you're not making sense......:disagree:
 
BD is slowly alligning itself with its real history. BD's 71 chetona education history is total blunder and made people total idiot. Body and mind should be in same place where you want to conquer. These guys are doing good job by concentrating mind in needed place. Where some people have their minds in India, Pakistan, KSA etc. For Muslims borders are artificial creation. Take away the borders and the new borders to be conquered. Today I dont like the fact that the conquerer Britishers should have left and left the power to the subjugated ones (as I believe in Survival of the fittest). Even if they left, they should have left power to the Muslims, from whom they took over. Instead of dividing in three parts, Muslims should have remained united, ruled India and cleaned India of beastly outdated cultures. But due to the blunder of 47 & 71 BD become a semi autonomous country with limited freedom of people.

 
How can it be under india if the Mughals were ruling it?.........:disagree:........it's like saying Australia was under Nigeria as both nations were both ruled by the British empire......:disagree:........you're not making sense......:disagree:
India wasn’t just a Hindu country like they want you to believe. Or that it was a United one, it was a collection of different people ruled by different empires. If we’re to talk about the whole subcontinent as a whole then we can say the people are more or less the same

We consider ourselves the descendants of Dilli Sultanat, Ghaznavi, Ghori, Mughals, and Durranis.

India has disowned its Muslim past, while we celebrate it.
Don’t let modi’s hate tactics make you think India isn’t what it was yesterday. It can never disown its past, no matter how much it tries.
The rest I agree with.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom