Warning no 69: Step back from Doklam to avoid confrontation - PLA Col Lili

[Kal Muah]

Can you support this 69% number of yours?

He included his own people from Bangladesh dude, understand that. "MODI WILL BE DECIMATED IN 2019" yeh wohi hai

 

[OnlyTheTruth]

These noxious loud mouthed Lili-puts and their verbal diarrhoea would put the most seasoned PDF troll to shame.

 

[idune]

That message was directed to Modi and his general Bipin something. They are already complying albeit slowly. It is good to see chest thumping show

 

[Areesh]

Well you can find solace in whatever you want cling on, fact is apA hasn't won any war till date

It didn't win any war but still managed to capture 86000 sq km of your atoot ang. Shows how bogus your history is.

True. We wouldn't have lost any if PAF was in action because Mujahideens with their tinger missles will fire better than PAF guys

Pathetic comeback. Try again.

Can you list the names of those Pakistanis who abandoned these tanks in India and ran away?

Must be difficult to gulp - capturing a jeep and leaving tanks behind.

Were they left at undefended Lahore?? Or were they left by a Major General leading an attack?

Or can you please tell me names of those virat hindus lost the biggest tank battle after world war II?

Or was this battle also lost because Indian army soldiers peed in their olive green pants since they found the front undefended.

Or why were these tanks left behind by Indian army??

Were they also left behind by Indian army because the front was undefended?

 

[Jackdaws]

It didn't win any war but still managed to capture 86000 sq km of your atoot ang. Shows how bogus your history is.



Pathetic comeback. Try again.



Were they left at undefended Lahore?? Or were they left by a Major General leading an attack?

Or can you please tell me names of those virat hindus lost the biggest tank battle after world war II?

Or was this battle also lost because Indian army soldiers peed in their olive green pants since they found the front undefended.

Or why were these tanks left behind by Indian army??

View attachment 416874

Were they also left behind by Indian army because the front was undefended?

Hagerty, Devin. South Asia in world politics. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005. p. 26. ISBN 0-7425-2587-2. Quote: The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time the United Nations intervened on 22 September, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat

McGarr, Paul. The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965. Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-139-02207-1. "Satisfied that it had secured a strategic and psychological victory over Pakistan by frustrating its attempt to seize Kashmir by force, when the UN resolution was passed, India accepted its terms ... with Pakistan's stocks of ammunition and other essential supplies all but exhausted, and with the military balance tipping steadily in India's favour."

Small, Andrew. The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics. Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-021075-5. "... the war itself was a disaster for Pakistan, from the first failed attempts by Pakistani troops to precipitate an insurgency in Kashmir to the appearance of Indian artillery within range of Lahore International Airport.

All these lying Pakistani allies

 

[Areesh]

Hagerty, Devin. South Asia in world politics. Rowman & Littlefield, 2005. p. 26. ISBN 0-7425-2587-2. Quote: The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time the United Nations intervened on 22 September, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat

McGarr, Paul. The Cold War in South Asia: Britain, the United States and the Indian Subcontinent, 1945–1965. Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-139-02207-1. "Satisfied that it had secured a strategic and psychological victory over Pakistan by frustrating its attempt to seize Kashmir by force, when the UN resolution was passed, India accepted its terms ... with Pakistan's stocks of ammunition and other essential supplies all but exhausted, and with the military balance tipping steadily in India's favour."

Small, Andrew. The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics. Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-19-021075-5. "... the war itself was a disaster for Pakistan, from the first failed attempts by Pakistani troops to precipitate an insurgency in Kashmir to the appearance of Indian artillery within range of Lahore International Airport.

All these lying Pakistani allies

Aww so you would be copy posting random sh!t since you are unable to explain why Indian army didn't conquer "undefended" Lahore???

How cute!!

 

[Jackdaws]

Aww so you would be copy posting random sh!t since you are unable to explain why Indian army didn't conquer "undefended" Lahore???

How cute!!

Read it again. Lol. Neutral accounts from reputed sources are "random shit". Words of madrassa educated chaps are "akashvani". Tsk tsk

 

[Areesh]

Read it again. Lol. Neutral accounts from reputed sources are "random shit". Words of madrassa educated chaps are "akashvani". Tsk tsk

RSS shakha educated jahil bharati I want to know more about the BS you said that your pussy army urinated in their olive green pants when they found out Lahore to be undefended as per you.

Tell us more about it. And also tells us what other excuses you have for other fronts.

 

[noksss]

It didn't win any war but still managed to capture 86000 sq km of your atoot ang. Shows how bogus your history is.



Pathetic comeback. Try again.



Were they left at undefended Lahore?? Or were they left by a Major General leading an attack?

Or can you please tell me names of those virat hindus lost the biggest tank battle after world war II?

Or was this battle also lost because Indian army soldiers peed in their olive green pants since they found the front undefended.

Or why were these tanks left behind by Indian army??

View attachment 416874

Were they also left behind by Indian army because the front was undefended?

Same to you dude

 

[Jackdaws]

RSS shakha educated jahil bharati I want to know more about the BS you said that your pussy army urinated in their olive green pants when they found out Lahore to be undefended as per you.

Tell us more about it. And also tells us what other excuses you have for other fronts.

Yawn. I already told you. They slowed their March toward Lahore thinking they were walking into a trap. Who would be stupid enough to leave their second largest city, so close to the IB undefended? No prizes for guessing. They regrouped when they were caught with their pants down. India halted the offensive unilaterally because a cease fire was imminent. Now go to YouTube and see a video of Bhutto crying in the UN in 1965. Comparing Pakistan to a small country in South America "invaded" by Brazil or Argentina. Next time, tell your madrassa teacher your real history.

 

[Areesh]

Yawn. I already told you. They slowed their March toward Lahore thinking they were walking into a trap. Who would be stupid enough to leave their second largest city, so close to the IB undefended? No prizes for guessing. They regrouped when they were caught with their pants down. India halted the offensive unilaterally because a cease fire was imminent. Now go to YouTube and see a video of Bhutto crying in the UN in 1965. Comparing Pakistan to a small country in South America "invaded" by Brazil or Argentina. Next time, tell your madrassa teacher your real history.

And then they got so terrified seeing Lahore allegedly undefended that their commander ran away to hide n a sugar cane field leaving his own jeep and all the sensitivities documents behind.

Great logic bharati. Obviously General Harbaksh Singh didn't know that Lahore was undefended and was angry on Major General Niranjan Parsad for nothing and PAF never bombed Indian forces attacking Lahore and Pakistan never counter attacked at Lahore front and no Indian soldier died at Lahore front and the world is flat.

Great story bharati. I have already shown you Indian general jeep leading attack on Lahore which clearly busts your monkeyas$ story about not conquering Lahore. Now go and ask that gau mutra drinker at RSS shakha why Sialkot was no not conquered. Lets see what new lameas$ excuse he has for you. And bhutto cried or danced at UN, it has nothign to do with the fact that your excuse for not conquering Lahore only showed you to be a very small size d!ck.

 

[#hydra#]

Typical BS from India. Ask yr favorite Nepal why they turned against you? India bully neighbour and act arrogant. And turn act innocnent and paint other as aggressor. We have listen to much of India nonsense. Indian make Bhutan as a puppet and force Bhutan to confront on doklam issue. Ask yourself why a sovereign nation of Bhutan has very limited diplomatic ties with rest of the world? India acting as bully , everybody know. China is the most righteous country.

This case is same applied to SCS where Vietnam and Japan are encouraged by USA to provoke China by infringing China territory. Ask yourself why Philippine turn to China side?

That's because,the people of Bhutan is like that,it their nature. Tell my why,the entire world is going behind the fancy thing and money,while still Bhutanese sticks to their traditional way of life.

And for your kind info,Tibetan peoples were also like that before Chinese invade Tibet forcefully,they don't even let westerners to out step on their land.

And then they got so terrified seeing Lahore allegedly undefended that their commander ran away to hide n a sugar cane field leaving his own jeep and all the sensitivities documents behind.

Great logic bharati. Obviously General Harbaksh Singh didn't know that Lahore was undefended and was angry on Major General Niranjan Parsad for nothing and PAF never bombed Indian forces attacking Lahore and Pakistan never counter attacked at Lahore front and no Indian soldier died at Lahore front and the world is flat.

Great story bharati. I have already shown you Indian general jeep leading attack on Lahore which clearly busts your monkeyas$ story about not conquering Lahore. Now go and ask that gau mutra drinker at RSS shakha why Sialkot was no not conquered. Lets see what new lameas$ excuse he has for you. And bhutto cried or danced at UN, it has nothign to do with the fact that your excuse for not conquering Lahore only showed you to be a very small size d!ck.

You guys lost half of your nation on that day,and you chest thumping about a mere abandoned four-wheel jeep,which hardly weighs less than a tonne I guess ,and you guys treated it as a victory symbol. What a desperation .... Man a jeep can be abandoned by many means,it could be due to a mechanical failure,it could be due to a lack of fuel ....

 

[Areesh]

You guys list half of your nation on that day,and you chest thumping about a mere abandoned four-wheel jeep,which hardly weighs less than a tonne I guess ,and you guys treated it as a victory symbol. What a desperation .... Man a jeep can be seated by many means,it could be due to a mechanical failure,it could be due to a lack of fuel ....

Lack of fuel

Read previous posts so that you know that jeep was abandoned due to lack of fuel or something else.

 

[#hydra#]

Lack of fuel

Read previous posts so that you know that jeep was abandoned due to lack of fuel or something else.

What ever ,you lost that battle,no battle can be won without expenses of men and money/material.

 

[Jackdaws]

And then they got so terrified seeing Lahore allegedly undefended that their commander ran away to hide n a sugar cane field leaving his own jeep and all the sensitivities documents behind.

Great logic bharati. Obviously General Harbaksh Singh didn't know that Lahore was undefended and was angry on Major General Niranjan Parsad for nothing and PAF never bombed Indian forces attacking Lahore and Pakistan never counter attacked at Lahore front and no Indian soldier died at Lahore front and the world is flat.

Great story bharati. I have already shown you Indian general jeep leading attack on Lahore which clearly busts your monkeyas$ story about not conquering Lahore. Now go and ask that gau mutra drinker at RSS shakha why Sialkot was no not conquered. Lets see what new lameas$ excuse he has for you. And bhutto cried or danced at UN, it has nothign to do with the fact that your excuse for not conquering Lahore only showed you to be a very small size d!ck.

Yes - all neutral sources are lying. Maulvi saab in the madrassa where you got trained in "history" is right. You have a jeep to show for it - just no articles. At least you admitted Bhutto cried like a little girl in the UN pleading to save Pak from India.

No read this from Time Magazine and cry some more and seek solace in a captured Jeep - in all likelihood stolen by Paks to flee from the border back to momma.

Clearly, Pakistan had little choice but to accept the U.N.'s cease-fire ultimatum. Cut off from U.S. and British arms supplies, denied Russian aid, and severely mauled by the larger Indian armed forces, Pakistan could continue the fight only by teaming up with Red China and turning its back on the U.N. To take those steps would have meant a permanent break with the West and an end to the Western aid that has so greatly stimulated Pakistan's economy. India, by contrast, is still the big gainer in the war. Shastri had united the nation as never before. Said one Western ambassador last week: "It used to be you could feed the word 'India' into the machine and it would spit out 'Maharajahs, snakes, too many babies, too many cows, spindly-legged Hindus.' Now it's apparent to everybody that India is going to emerge as an Asian power in its own right.

Source: http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/printout/0,8816,834413,00.html

Looks like you have a lot to tell your madrassa teacher now. Do burst his bubble.