What's new

Vietnam's Kilo-class submarines a serious threat to China

The army and air force are used for directly attacking an enemy nation's homeland. China is a land power like Germany, France and USSR. Besides, the reason that navy was strong is that it is the "global commons". Well, space is also a "global commons".
Well said.

However please note, military paradigm has drastically changed since 1805 Battle of Trafalgar.

After 1805, "land powers" (as you put it) have consistently been on the backfoot and consistently defeated.

For example, Germany lost because it lost the war on seas. It failed to supply its troops overseas, and it failed to get enough fuel to run its "land power".

I can go on and on, about other "land powers".

If you talk about wars before 1805, then you are right.
After 1805-2015, it is totally different.

Now who knows if this paradigm based on Naval power is over and the next war will be under different model such as "Space being global common".

Me thinks the role of space will complement naval power and not replace it.

peace
 
Last edited:
.
Excellent, well said, couldn't have said it better to be honest. I also said the same thing on here before. Its really surprising to see Chinese members here even comparing themselves with a small poor nation like Vietnam. lool Its just hilarious to be honest. I guess it just shows China is still an insecure power. Imagine the the U.S or Russia always comparing their navy with Venezuela and Ukraine respectively.:rofl:


:rofl: That was rude, but i must confess that made my day.:lol:



I can see Russia(Chinas so called strategic partner against the west/U.S. lol) is arming Vietnam quite well. Interesting.........:enjoy: Keep it up old Bear.:cheers:

:cheers:

China Leaves Russia High and Dry : News : Realty Today
 
.
The only difference is that the British have had a long time legacy of great Naval Prowess in modern history.

Britain has an unprecedented naval history , whose power was unrivaled for almost 3 centuries. China , specifically the PLAN, is largely untested in an extra-hemispherical condition and have largely remained within their borders for most of the PRC's and the PLAN's existence. They have had no experience or exposure to combating a large naval military force or have experience in a combined land - naval expeditionary mission.

The only Navy in Asia, specifically the Pacific Region, that has a history and legacy of this, as well as carrier based warfare is the Japanese Maritime Defense Force, which is the Legacy of the Great Imperial Japanese Navy [Dai Nippon Teikoku Kaigun]


izumo-flag_3247188b.jpg
Come on, all the shit empires you refer to have been dead forever. Nowadays all the so-called great fleets are under sea and become the fish homes.:omghaha:

The PLAAF and PLA are not the PLAN.

Naval wise, it PLAN has never engaged in a major operation aside from exercises.

The ROCN at least tried to resist the Imperial Navy before it was annihilated by the Nihon Kaigun.
bro stop self-comforting, your rival have more tonnage, and have 15+ nuclear subs you have no (any your so-called advanced diesel subs are their dishes), are you serious you can servive? And all the comments of this thread have ignored the existence of the PLA Second Artillery(it can send your all self-defended forces to the sky within one hour) equiped with a large amout of powerful ASBMs, anti-ship cruise missiles even cheap anti-ship rockets.:cheers:
 
Last edited:
. .
Come on, all the shit empires you refer to have been dead forever. Nowadays all the so-called great fleets are under sea and become the artificial fish reefs:omghaha:


bro stop self-comforting, your rival have more tonnage, and have 15+ nuclear subs you have no (any your so-called advanced diesel subs are their dishes), are you serious you can servive? And all the comments of this thread have ignored the existence of the PLA Second Artillery equiped with a large amout of ASBMs, anti-ship cruise missiles even cheap anti-ship rockets.:cheers:

Also don't forget that all modern Japanese naval assets rely on the foreign technologies.

The Kongo and Atago classes all rely on the US Aegies electronic systems and the US gas turbine technology.

The Soryu also rely on the Swedish Stirling technology.
 
. .
China's anti-submarine capabilities are improving with the type 056A corvettes and type 056A frigates with their strong ASW capabilities (hull mounted sonar, towed array sonar, variable depth sonar and ASW helicopter) and now China is inducting the Y-8FQ/GX-6 Maritime Patrol Aircraft. China is going to produce a lot of these naval and air assets.

China adding towed sonars to Type 054A, Type 056 vessels - IHS Jane's 360

Chinese Navy New Y-8FQ Cub/GX-6 Maritime Patrol Aircraft Operational with PLAN North Sea Fleet
 
. . . . . . .
our Kilos is upgraded with latest technology of Russia. Chinese kilos are noisier than ours.,

China has learnt pretty much all there is to know in conventional submarines from Russia through reverse engineering and espionage. That's why China no longer buys Russian conventional submarines anymore. No point in buying submarine technology that is similar to Chinese conventional submarine technology and even if Russia has new technologies, it won't make much of difference as China is technologically advancing faster than Russia can get ahead.

China's technological advancement and industrial capability, not to mention the already large and growing budget makes it impossible for any Asian country to keep up with China.
 
.
Vietnam vs. China

same as

Argentina vs. Britain over Falklands
same as Vietnam vs. Mongolian Empire in ancient time
at the end of the day, only few of the 500,000 strong barbarian army invading vietnam survived. what a bloodshed.
tranhungdao1.jpg


tranhungdao.jpg
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom