What's new

PLA navy's 'sharks' get stealthier, China on verge of producing 'world-class' nuclear submarines: Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't argue @GreatHanWarrior he just a troll and nothing else Sir
@White and Green with M/S
@aziqbal
good. I agree with your and his views.

I only have one question... How to prove that British toilet carriers can win over Chinese casino carriers? pls~

Don't argue @GreatHanWarrior he just a troll and nothing else Sir
Chinese so stupid they couldn't copy anything so they copied the most rubbish junk carrier of the world from Russia

View attachment 948767
Let's change the question. Can British toilet carriers win over Indian aircraft carriers??? Why?

MTXX_MH20230826_042322033.jpg
 
.
Russian Carrier

so good Chinese copied it not only once but two times!

no wonder China cant sail it outside South China Sea

View attachment 948637

Don't argue @GreatHanWarrior he just a troll and nothing else Sir
We all know that the Chinese casino carrier is Junk. But the problem is. How to prove that British toilet carriers can win over Chinese casino carriers?

This is China's casino carrier.

Screenshot_20230826_213436.jpg


Screenshot_20230826_213637.jpg


Screenshot_20230826_183252.jpg

Screenshot_20230826_045002.jpg


My question is. How can you prove that the British toilet carrier can win over the Chinese casino carrier?

just this?

Screenshot_20230826_042914.jpg
Screenshot_20230825_050133.jpg
 
.
We all know that the Chinese casino carrier is Junk. But the problem is. How to prove that British toilet carriers can win over Chinese casino carriers?

This is China's casino carrier.

View attachment 948817

View attachment 948821

View attachment 948815
View attachment 948814

My question is. How can you prove that the British toilet carrier can win over the Chinese casino carrier?

just this?

View attachment 948824


THIS IS FAKE
 
. .
well. Only you are honest. Everyone knows you are a former think tank member. The only member who was expelled from the think tank. Maybe you're too honest?

yes I am very happy because now I can say what I like to Chinese trolls like you without being restricted by title

so you agree you posted a FAKE photo ?
 
.
@White and Green with M/S
@aziqbal
good. I agree with your and his views.

I only have one question... How to prove that British toilet carriers can win over Chinese casino carriers? pls~
Experience British and USA designing/developing carriers since at least ww2 and they develop mature tactics/doctrine since at least 60 to 70 years you just started to developing those tactics/doctrine and you assume you that you're world beater in CARRIER tactics and doctrine if you believe that I would like to say you're living in the delusional world

My question is. How can you prove that the British toilet carrier can win over the Chinese casino carrier?

just this?

Screenshot_20230826_042914.jpg
Screenshot_20230825_050133.jpg
For having better experience/tactics and doctrine
 
.
yes I am very happy because now I can say what I like to Chinese trolls like you without being restricted by title

so you agree you posted a FAKE photo ?
former think tank member. :enjoy:

Experience British and USA designing/developing carriers since at least ww2 and they develop mature tactics/doctrine since at least 60 to 70 years you just started to developing those tactics/doctrine and you assume you that you're world beater in CARRIER tactics and doctrine if you believe that I would like to say you're living in the delusional world


For having better experience/tactics and doctrine
OK Back to the real world.

We all know that Liaoning is a casino carrier. But it can patrol Japan. Then simulate a strike against Japan. My question is, can British toilet carriers patrol Russia?

Boasting about two British toilet carrier? Do you guess Russia believes you?
 
.
Experience British and USA designing/developing carriers since at least ww2 and they develop mature tactics/doctrine since at least 60 to 70 years you just started to developing those tactics/doctrine and you assume you that you're world beater in CARRIER tactics and doctrine if you believe that I would like to say you're living in the delusional world


For having better experience/tactics and doctrine
really. We all know that an aircraft carrier is just a moving target ship. So aircraft carriers must rely on carrier strike groups.

But have you seen the British Toilet Carrier Strike Group?

You said that the British toilet aircraft carrier has "For having better experience/activities and doctrine".... Can British toilet carriers patrol Russia?
 
.
really. We all know that an aircraft carrier is just a moving target ship. So aircraft carriers must rely on carrier strike groups.

But have you seen the British Toilet Carrier Strike Group?
Yes but you're in denial mode type 45 have enough radar range to detect track destroy your copy and unstealthy junk 15 at long ranges before they can pose any threats to British carriers battle groups
 
.
Yes but you're in denial mode type 45 have enough radar range to detect track destroy your copy and unstealthy junk 15 at long ranges before they can pose any threats to British carriers battle groups
emmm... Type 45 has been in the repair shop.... I keep saying. The combat effectiveness of British toilet aircraft carriers mainly relies on boasting. :dance3:

Yes but you're in denial mode type 45 have enough radar range to detect track destroy your copy and unstealthy junk 15 at long ranges before they can pose any threats to British carriers battle groups
Proof of facts. The British toilet carrier did not even have the courage to patrol Russia. :cheesy:

Yes but you're in denial mode type 45 have enough radar range to detect track destroy your copy and unstealthy junk 15 at long ranges before they can pose any threats to British carriers battle groups
BTW. The British toilet carrier does not even have carrier based aircraft. LOL. Junk-15? Enough to massacre the entire British toilet navy! :lol:

Yes but you're in denial mode type 45 have enough radar range to detect track destroy your copy and unstealthy junk 15 at long ranges before they can pose any threats to British carriers battle groups
Oh. Forgot to ask you. When did you see the “British Toilet Carrier Strike Group”?
 
Last edited:
.
emmm... Type 45 has been in the repair shop.... I keep saying. The combat effectiveness of British toilet aircraft carriers mainly relies on boasting. :dance3:


Proof of facts. The British toilet carrier did not even have the courage to patrol Russia. :cheesy:
Ah and how do you know that you have no logic and common sense

Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore
 
.
Ah and how do you know that you have no logic and common sense

Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore
really~“Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore”.......So British toilet carriers have the courage to patrol Russia?

The British toilet carrier only threatens British repair shops.

Ah and how do you know that you have no logic and common sense

Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore
Compare China's casino carrier strike groups.

Screenshot_20230826_213637.jpg
Screenshot_20230826_213436.jpg


The British toilet carrier is indeed garbage. Isn't it?
 
Last edited:
.
really~“Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore”.......So British toilet carriers have the courage to patrol Russia?

The British toilet carrier only threatens British repair shops.
Yes Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore because they are not having a range of to come closer to NATO waters

But they petrol scs few years back
Compare China's casino carrier strike groups.

Screenshot_20230826_213637.jpg
Screenshot_20230826_213436.jpg


The British toilet carrier is indeed garbage. Isn't it?
Know you that you're just ultra national shit blind troll and nothing else
 
.
Yes Russian Navy is not threat to Britain anymore because they are not having a range of to come closer to NATO waters

But they petrol scs few years back
Know you that you're just ultra national shit blind troll and nothing else
Answer: British toilet carriers have the courage to patrol Russia?

yes or no?
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom