What's new

PLA navy's 'sharks' get stealthier, China on verge of producing 'world-class' nuclear submarines: Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
. .
1 British SBBN is enough for China
emm..... So you also know that British toilet aircraft carriers are garbage.

The Chinese navy fleet stays near the Atlantic Ocean for many years. You can have the British SBBN try to handle them first. Continue blowing. :cheesy:
 
.
emm..... So you also know that British toilet aircraft carriers are garbage.

The Chinese navy fleet stays near the Atlantic Ocean for many years. You can have the British SBBN try to handle them first. Continue blowing. :cheesy:
Know you you're just a troll

Dude your mental disorder has no cure I am sorry to say that
 
.
Know you you're just a troll

Dude your mental disorder has no cure I am sorry to say that
I said so. Unlike the British Toilet Navy! The Chinese Navy fleet is in the whole world!

Chinese Navy Fleet Patrols Alaska!


Different from you. I never boast. I provide all the evidence. You call me a troll. Okay. Who cares about you?

Know you you're just a troll

Dude your mental disorder has no cure I am sorry to say that
You're just a bragging troll. Don't think everyone is like you. :lol:
 
.
I said so. Unlike the British Toilet Navy! The Chinese Navy fleet is in the whole world!

Chinese Navy Fleet Patrols Alaska!


Different from you. I never boast. I provide all the evidence. You call me a troll. Okay. Who cares about you?
It doesn't matter you petrol Alaska few hundred miles and what is the solid evidence you post instead trolling
 
. . . . . .
Well. The British toilet carrier lacks the courage to patrol Russia. So what is the purpose of this rubbish?
Why you stuck your head in the same question again and again Russian Navy is not threat to any NATO Navy so no need to petrol near the Russian seas
 
.
Why you stuck your head in the same question again and again Russian Navy is not threat to any NATO Navy so no need to petrol near the Russian seas
If the British toilet carrier cannot even patrol Russia (a country without even a main warship). So what is the significance of the existence of this toilet carrier?

A very simple question. Why do you always run away?

Do you forget how you boasted that British toilet carriers could win over Chinese casino carriers?

@aziqbal I keep saying. The combat capability of many Western military weapons mainly relies on boasting.
 
.
Why you stuck your head in the same question again and again Russian Navy is not threat to any NATO Navy so no need to petrol near the Russian seas
And please don't lie. Even against Libya. NATO still deploys a strong aircraft carrier strike group.

The problem is. If the British toilet aircraft carrier is not rubbish... It can patrol Russia alone.

Just like the Chinese casino carrier strike group patrolling Japan.

But the British toilet carrier does not. Is it lacking independent action ability?
 
Last edited:
.
@GreatHanWarrior

Go through your posts in this thread and let me know if they are the barometer of quality and substance?

This thread is locked on the account of excessive trolling.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom