You can not know that 长江 and 扬子江 where is this river in China, one or two river ?.
Read again my post carefully, stubborn uneducated kid.
Chang Jiang and Yangtze are the same river,you are the one that brought it up not me so you only have yourself to blame.
You are raging at me because your own scholars disagree with you,you write nothing of value.
We read our history book written by our ancestors.
If Chinese history books don't mentioned about it, we don't care bcz it written by our enemy. Its reported that when MaYuan invaded in to Jiaozhi he has been destroyed and burnt all our books and culture heritages.
It doesn't matter if Vietnamese or Chinese wrote it,we have to critically examine the texts to see what is useful and what is not.
What convenient excuse for you that Ma Yuan destroyed Vietnamese literature,it is stated in the Shiji he brought back the bronze drums to the capital to be smelted down into a statue nothing about burning Vietnamese texts.
Do you understand what is humorous story, joke ? low educated boy can not understand what does it mean.
When confronted with your lies you fail to source it,saying I have low education when you can't even read you own history is hilarious.
1/ many commandant with his people settled back to Jiaozhi/Vietnam when Van lang is collapsed, then they should keep a same name of which division was in southern China.
2/ China don't cared about it, but in Guangxi is discovered written Character of Luo Yue people same what we found in Sapa Vietnam.
3/ Zhou dynasty of China recorded that Viet Thuong people came to Court of Zhou to visit.
4/ It should be Han Chinese don't like to mention about it, like Yelang or Nan Yue etc bcz it related first to Han people who involved in establishe o Yelang and NanYue etc in the past.
Van Lang was created by our ancestors, no Hans.
1.Then name the divisions in Southern China,should I quote Dai Viet su ky toan thu and show you that the there were no region names for Southern China?
I'll be here waiting for you to provide your sources.
2.I already told you that the tadpole script is from ethnic minorities which you Kinh Vietnamese conveniently stole,notice how 3rd century BC drum already transitioned to Sinitic characters. Luoyue did not live outside Northern Vietnam and Guangxi so again where is the archaeological evidence in other areas?
3.The tale of Viet Thuong is about them bringing tribute nothing about Van Lang,furthermore they are from the region where the Chams lived.
4.Han Chinese recognize that these states existed,provide the proof that the Baiyue had a Hung sovereign.
I don't care who founded Van Lang,what I do care is your own fanciful tales that Van Lang owned Southern China which you provided absolutely nothing.
Vietnamese/Kinh people speak Mon/Khmer language or in other word Austro Asiatic language.
Austroasiatic languages - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't know how many times I have to drill it in your head Vietnamese =/= all other Austro Asiatic languages.
The researchers themselves never said that these words are Vietnamese but Austro Asiatic.
Using your logic the Munda of North East India are now magically speaking Vietnamese see how silly that sounds?
I said I don't care. Its trashes. You can troll and troll only,kid.
Denying research that doesn't agree with your claims is a classic example of cherry picking sources.
You are nothing more than a fraud with an ax to grind,you can't even provide proof when I request it and every one of your claims have been busted.
I don't troll unlike you I provide sources that are written by your own and international scholars,you simply distort ancient texts or go off topic.
