What's new

Vietnam launches its first domestically made warship equipped with missiles

Status
Not open for further replies.
But before the VN navy had chance to your enemy and to launch your missiles, It will be already a history after PLAN's attack.
But PLAN dare not attack bcz they know they will lose again like 1979 :cool:

You'd better accept the fact that your new president have to return all of islands in SCS(east sea) to VN in near future , and say "those islands belong to VN" again like your Quing emperor :P
 
. .
If you know how aircraft carriers are made these days, and the capabilities of anti-ship missiles, you won't make such foolish statement. Missiles from a small boat like this can at most damage the deck surface of a carrier, that is if it can ever get in range of firing. Carriers have AWACs that can spot your boat hundreds of miles away, and air crafts can sink the small boats within minutes.

It sounds like you memorize the books, OK, that's right. By contrast, with B-52, do you know how it works? do you know how it is protected? Have you ever read the information B-52 was shot down by one of our pilots on December 27, 1972 in the sky Vietnam?

This Vietnam ship is probably going to be used to scare fisherman that's it. I see little combat value.

We never use warships threaten fishermen like the Chinese had done.
That was only a first warship we build, of course we are owned other warships, which bought from Russia, much more powerful.
 
.
But PLAN dare not attack bcz they know they will lose again like 1979 :cool:

You'd better accept the fact that your new president have to return all of islands in SCS(east sea) to VN in near future , and say "those islands belong to VN" again like your Quing emperor :P
:lol: Did you forget about the slaughter that happened in 1979?

Between February 17 and March 16, 1979 (28 days), Vietnam suffered 100,000 civilian deaths and 30,000 military deaths at China's hands. That's a staggering 4643 dead per day. That's almost the number of deaths the US military suffered in Iraq since 2003 in just one day. Wounded Vietnamese must be around 2x to 3x the number of dead.

Even the USA war that lasted 10+ years long didn't inflict on you the same intensity of human suffering, even though they sprayed you with agent orange and burned you with napalm. In fact, China's spanking was even more painful than USA's, it was just shorter in length because your ally USSR threatened us, and we figured the lesson was taught. Vietnam never called itself "the third most powerful army in the world" after 1979!

Next time, we won't stop spanking after 28 days. We'll keep spanking for 10+ years just like USA did to you and there will be very few Vietnamese left :lol:
 
.
lmao typical Chinese braggarts on the loose. If this ship is so insignificant why do all the chinis have their panties in a bunch:lol:

---------- Post added at 06:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:47 PM ----------

vietnam-manufactures-warship-1-275328.jpg


warship.jpg
 
. .
:lol: Did you forget about the slaughter that happened in 1979?

Between February 17 and March 16, 1979 (28 days), Vietnam suffered 100,000 civilian deaths and 30,000 military deaths at China's hands. That's a staggering 4643 dead per day. That's almost the number of deaths the US military suffered in Iraq since 2003 in just one day. Wounded Vietnamese must be around 2x to 3x the number of dead.

Even the USA war that lasted 10+ years long didn't inflict on you the same intensity of human suffering, even though they sprayed you with agent orange and burned you with napalm. In fact, China's spanking was even more painful than USA's, it was just shorter in length because your ally USSR threatened us, and we figured the lesson was taught. Vietnam never called itself "the third most powerful army in the world" after 1979!

Next time, we won't stop spanking after 28 days. We'll keep spanking for 10+ years just like USA did to you and there will be very few Vietnamese left :lol:



In China, war with Vietnam is forgotten history
(AFP) – Feb 15, 2009
SHANGHAI (AFP) — China invaded Vietnam 30 years ago this week, but the event will not be officially marked by Beijing, which refuses to acknowledge the war -- making life even harder for veterans who are haunted by it.
After a year surrounded by death in Vietnam -- gripping a machine gun between diving for cover from howitzer fire -- Zhou Feng decided to spend the rest of his days protecting life, not ending it.
The former infantryman said the shame he felt at all the death pushed him to study animal medicine when he returned from the front.
Zhou, 45, now works at a veterinary clinic and at home he shelters 30 stray dogs -- by coincidence one for each year since the war.
"In China, the government respects history about as much as they respect these dogs," Zhou said.
Chinese academics are prohibited from studying the war, in part to avoid damaging relations with former foe Vietnam, said Xiaoming Zhang, an associate professor at the US military's Air War College in Alabama.
Zhang is writing a book about the conflict that he hopes will be the closest thing to a Chinese account of what happened.
"It was Deng Xiaoping's war," Zhang said, adding study of the bloody and inconclusive war may also be banned to prevent it from becoming a "black stain" on the record of the father of China's economic reform.
China attacked Vietnam, according to non-Chinese accounts, to punish it for invading Cambodia in December 1978 and bringing down genocidal tyrant Pol Pot and his Beijing-backed Khmer Rouge communist regime.
Bad blood with the Soviet Union and Moscow's support for Hanoi, which Beijing saw as increasingly aggressive after beating the United States and South Vietnam, was also an important factor.
"(Deng) used the war against Vietnam to convince the US that China was a reliable ally for countering Soviet expansion," Zhang said.
Despite China declaring victory after a month of fighting, a low-intensity conflict smouldered for most of the 1980s.
"It was a bleeding strategy to burden Vietnam while China was able to carry out economic reforms," Zhang said.
Like Zhou, Xu Ke fought on the frontlines in 1984 as part of that bleeding.
He later spent two years researching a memoir about the war, but found library after library had nothing about the conflict and even army historians turned him away.
"History is just like a wall, made up of different bricks," Xu said. "But the brick that should contain our history has been deliberately removed. That's why I wrote the book, I wanted to put it back."
The 44-year-old finished the book about five years ago, but has since given up finding a publisher to take it.
There are no figures for how many died in the extended conflict, but losses were massive. Non-Chinese scholars estimate for the first month alone 25,000 to 63,000 Chinese were killed and 20,000 to 62,000 Vietnamese died, said historian Peter Worthing, author of "A Military History of Modern China".
"Clearly the 1979 war served as a warning or wake-up call to the Chinese leadership that the PLA needed improvement," Worthing said, referring to the People's Liberation Army.
Despite its advantage in numbers and strength, China fought to a bloody stalemate and had no effect on Vietnam's foreign policy, he said.
The Chinese government "saw little to boast about and this undoubtedly helps explain the lack of official acknowledgement of this war and those who fought in it," Worthing said.
Wu, a former propaganda officer who served in Vietnam 25 years ago, said he used to leaf through his teenage son's history textbooks, searching in vain for a mention of the war.
"Why should this war be hidden from history? It's so unfair to us," he said, asking to be identified by his surname only because of the topic's sensitivity.
The 45-year-old has recurring nightmares about being shelled, but has never spoken to his son about his experiences.
"How could he understand our time and the war?" Wu asked. "He would feel like he was hearing someone else's story even though it would be coming from me."
Copyright © 2012 AFP. All rights reserved. More »
http://http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iCgcnUw68LFsvOSb34kr-rFAdsjA
 
. .
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Chinese casualties

To this day, both sides of the conflict describe themselves as the
victor. The number of casualties is disputed, with some Western sources
putting PLA casualties at more than 20,000 throughout the war. Chinese democracy activist Wei Jingsheng told
western media in 1980 the Chinese troops had suffered 9,000 deaths and more than 10,000 wounded during the war,[25] but a recent leak showed that the PLA had 6,954 killed and 14,800 wounded,[5] and 238 Prisoners of War[26] in the course of the war.



Vietnamese casualties

There are no independently verifiable details of Vietnamese
casualties;
like their counterparts in the Chinese government, the
Vietnamese government has never announced any information on its actual
military casualties. The Nhan Dan newspaper[27]
the Central Organ of the Communist Party of Vietnam claimed that
Vietnam suffered more than 10,000 civilian deaths during the Chinese
invasion[27] and earlier on May 17, 1979, reported statistics on heavy losses of industry and agriculture properties.[27]

Vietnamese armed personnel:

Regular forces (from Chinese sources): 100,100 killed in total, Wounded: more than 10,000. 2210 Prisoners of War.[5][28] Province Militia and divisions of the Public Security Army: unknown, the causality estimated: 70,000[29]
 
.
Sino-Vietnamese War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Chinese invaded Northern Vietnam and captured some of the northernmost cities in Vietnam. On March 6 China declared that the gate to Hanoi was open and that their punitive mission had been achieved and retreated back to China. Both China and Vietnam claimed victory in the last of the Indochina Wars of the twentieth century; as Vietnamese troops remained in Cambodia until 1989 it can be said that the PRC failed to achieve the goal of dissuading Vietnam from involvement in Cambodia. China achieved its strategic objective of reducing the offensive capability of Vietnam along the Sino-Vietnam border by implementing a scorched earth policy. China also achieved another strategic objective of demonstrating to its Cold War foe, the Soviet Union, that they were unable to protect their Vietnamese ally. As many as 1.5 million Chinese troops were stationed along China's borders with the USSR at the time and were prepared for a full-scale war.Bruce Elleman "one of the primary diplomatic goals behind China's attack was to expose Soviet assurances of military support to Vietnam as a fraud. Seen in this light, Beijing's policy was actually a diplomatic success, since Moscow did not actively intervene, thus showing the practical limitations of the Soviet-Vietnamese military pact.... China achieved a strategic victory by minimizing the future possibility of a two-front war against the USSR and Vietnam."

wikipedia

Aftermath

To reduce Vietnam's military capability against China, the Chinese implemented a "scorched-earth policy" while returning to China, causing extensive damage to the Vietnamese countryside and infrastructure.[31] Although Vietnam continued to occupy Cambodia, China successfully mobilized international opposition to the occupation, rallying such leaders as Cambodia's deposed king Norodom Sihanouk, Cambodian anticommunist leader Son Sann, and high-ranking members of the Khmer Rouge to deny the pro-Vietnam regime in Cambodia diplomatic recognition beyond the Soviet bloc. China improved relations with ASEAN by promising protection to Thailand and Singapore against "Vietnamese aggression". In contrast, Vietnam's decreasing prestige in the region led it to be more dependent on the Soviet Union, to which it leased a naval base at Cam Ranh Bay.[32]

Border skirmishes continued throughout the 1980s, including a significant skirmish in April 1984.

Armed conflict only ended in 1989 after the Vietnamese agreed to fully withdraw from Cambodia.

This conflict also saw the first use of the Type 81 assault rifle by the Chinese and a naval battle over the Spratly Islands in 1988. In 1999 after many years of negotiations, China and Vietnam signed a border pact, though the line of demarcation remained secret.[33] There was a very slight adjustment of the land border, resulting in land being given up to China, which caused the widespread complaints within Vietnam.[

On March 6, China declared that the gate to Hanoi was open and that their punitive mission had been achieved. On the way back to the Chinese border, the PLA destroyed all local infrastructure and housing and looted all useful equipment and resources (including livestock), completely paralyzing the economy of northern Vietnam.[5] The PLA crossed the border back into China on March 16. While China claimed to have crushed the Vietnamese resistance, Vietnam claimed that China had mostly only fought against border militias. This allowed both sides to claim military victory, as both sides claimed to have taught their opponent a lesson.[24]
 
.
we killed much more Vietnamese and captured 10 times more Vietnamese POWs and totally destroyed North Vietnam,and Vietnamese soldiers can not even touch a grass on China land,haha,still bragging about "victory"?
 
. . .
We built the warship for the purpose only to protect our waters, against the invaders.

:lol: Did you forget about the slaughter that happened in 1979?

Between February 17 and March 16, 1979 (28 days), Vietnam suffered 100,000 civilian deaths and 30,000 military deaths at China's hands. That's a staggering 4643 dead per day. That's almost the number of deaths the US military suffered in Iraq since 2003 in just one day. Wounded Vietnamese must be around 2x to 3x the number of dead.

Even the USA war that lasted 10+ years long didn't inflict on you the same intensity of human suffering, even though they sprayed you with agent orange and burned you with napalm. In fact, China's spanking was even more painful than USA's, it was just shorter in length because your ally USSR threatened us, and we figured the lesson was taught. Vietnam never called itself "the third most powerful army in the world" after 1979!

Next time, we won't stop spanking after 28 days. We'll keep spanking for 10+ years just like USA did to you and there will be very few Vietnamese left :lol:

Perhaps, only the Chinese people proud of their army killed civilians. That is true sickness.

haha,who taught who a lesson?do you want to go over it all over again?

we killed much more Vietnamese and captured 10 times more Vietnamese POWs and totally destroyed North Vietnam,and Vietnamese soldiers can not even touch a grass on China land,haha,still bragging about "victory"?

You are proud of Sino-Vietnam war in 1979, but the blind arrogance of you did you not realize that your mighty army was defeated by our militia. Your mighty army ran home with its tail curl between its legs.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom