What's new

Vietnam dancing between US alliance and Chinese brotherhood: Global Times

Viet

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
29,950
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Germany
Vietnam dancing between US alliance and Chinese brotherhood - Asian Review - Globaltimes.cn

Global Times | 2014-2-10 18:48:01
By Li Kaisheng



c44da563-9119-4e9b-b31d-d58e05b2b21c.jpeg

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT



The last couple of years have witnessed growing animosity between China and the Philippines, while China's relations with Vietnam, another major claimant to the South China Sea islands, remain relatively peaceful. Tensions between China and Vietnam have not escalated, and Vietnam has not shown much eagerness to draw close to the US. However, Vietnam still plays a significant role in the game between China and the US.

In fact, considering the structure and complexity of the contradictions between China and Vietnam, the two might face an even graver situation than that between China and the Philippines.

Among all the claimants, Vietnam claims the widest territory, almost the entire South China Sea. But Vietnam has long been wary of its northern neighbor. Historically, Vietnam was a vassal state of China for a millennium. In addition to this, the 1979 war with China still sticks in Vietnam's craw.

After the rapprochement between Vietnam and the US in 1995, their relationship is on the rise. Although the Vietnam War was calamitous for the nation, it seems that Vietnam does not bear a grudge against its former opponent.

Geopolitical considerations prevail over the pain of war. Located relatively far from Vietnam,Washington neither has a territorial dispute nor poses an imminent threat to the country's interests.

Washington's Vietnam policy has almost gained bipartisan support. Since 1995, two US presidents, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have paid visits to Vietnam. And regardless of who is in the White House, Vietnamese leaders are welcomed as honored guests.

In 2010, then US secretary of state Hillary Clinton declared in Hanoi that the US has a "national interest" in the South China Sea. And both countries signed an unprecedented US-Vietnam Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement in October 2013. Their bilateral relationship, as these events show, is in a steady process of development.

But it seems Vietnam will not be tamed as the Philippines has been. Compared with the US, Vietnam is also more dependent on China in terms of economic development. Although the US has become Vietnam's biggest export market, China remains Vietnam's biggest import market. Without China, Vietnam's economy may suffer major blows.

And there is an unbreakable barrier between the ruling Communist Party of Vietnam and Washington - a divergence in political regime and ideology.

Although the US is always a realist whose actions are based on its national interests, it never loses its innate enthusiasm for promoting Western democracy and advocating Western values such as human rights and freedom. These actions would jeopardize the governance of Vietnam's ruling party.

This dilemma between Hanoi and Washington will probably turn into a long-standing issue.

Vietnam's ruling party will hold on to its ruling position because of its success in developing the national economy. But meanwhile, subjects such as democracy and human rights will not be wiped off Washington's diplomatic agenda. The game will last a long time.

It is this dilemma that will urge Vietnam to reexamine its relationship with China and see Beijing as a valuable friend. Both are now in a similar situation, where they face the same challenges imposed by the US-led West.

These elements will turn Vietnam into a "two-faced" nation. It embraces the US when it encounters territorial disputes and geopolitical games with its neighbors. But it will give Washington the cold shoulder when the issues of political regime and ideology gain the upper hand. Its attitude toward China will be the reverse.

In the long term, Vietnam's foreign policy will be made under the cover of this "two-faced" approach. It will neither pledge allegiance to Washington as an ally, nor will it constantly maintain a "brotherhood" with China.



The author is an associate research fellow at the Institute of International Relations, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
 
This article glossed over what I feel is the main reason for Vietnam's reluctance to pick a side.

Under US hegemony, the SCS islands will go to the pinoys. The pinoys have been the loyal white man's burden for 5 centuries, so they have to be rewarded for it. If the pinoys controlled all the islands, they would open up brothels on all the islands and invite US servicemen to come and be serviced by hordes of filipino women, which will provide substantial revenue for the pinoy government. I can't imagine the other claimants (China, RoC, Vietnam, Malaysia) would do that since it's so debasing and shameful, which leaves the US government no incentive to see the islands ccontrolled by anyone else. But a balance of power in the SCS means Vietnam at least has a chance to grab some.
 
Was china a lucky slave of USA in cold war ?

nixon-mao_2260378b.jpg

calling Mao or Deng a slave is like calling Ho Chi Minh a slave. These guys are hardcore revolutionaries that won't give up even if it's just them and a stick against 10 divisions of US troops.

They have proved it in the face of overwhelming odds.
 
Two-faced approach is the only choice left for Vietnam, given the current situation here. Vietnam is totally under China's economy influence, taking advantage and sharing the benefits of China's development, while doing bad things to threaten Chinese fishmen's safety.
 
calling Mao or Deng a slave is like calling Ho Chi Minh a slave. These guys are hardcore revolutionaries that won't give up even if it's just them and a stick against 10 divisions of US troops.

They have proved it in the face of overwhelming odds.

but this hardcore revolutionaries changed China from Socialist pack to USA side 1972 in cold war.

Two-faced approach is the only choice left for Vietnam, given the current situation here. Vietnam is totally under China's economy influence, taking advantage and sharing the benefits of China's development, while doing bad things to threaten Chinese fishmen's safety.

don't lie.
only china made a fishing ban on our sea.
 
but this hardcore revolutionaries changed China from Socialist pack to USA side 1972 in cold war.

So...? It was the right thing to do. Communist American relationship during WW2 was at one time very good, with Americans very impressed by the organization and hard working nature of the communists.

Ho Chi Minh got vast support from China and Russia during the Vietnam war, but at no time did he submit to these powers. He always maintained an independent Vietnam. Does this make him weak for accepting Chinese aid? He was very adamant about no Chinese intervention in the war. Just like China was having none of the American troops or decision making for China.

I'm not sure how switching to American's side makes us a slave, or weak.
 
I wish our Vietnamese friend good luck with being a slave for the US of A. LOL

If Vietnam want to be a US slave, there's no Vietnam War - the modern longest war, that no other countries ever suffered ...

There's always the pilot solution, COC, DOC ... We all want China respect those and has the properly advanced step to showing their good will.
( 1. Nine-dashed line must be removed before any furthermore discussion )

But, after such a long time and every effort seems not to have any result. China only want to buying time ... We all become impatient to just wait for China positive response.

The plan B would come in our minds, ... I cannot reveal the content of Plan B. Sorry
 
So...? It was the right thing to do. Communist American relationship during WW2 was at one time very good, with Americans very impressed by the organization and hard working nature of the communists.

Ho Chi Minh got vast support from China and Russia during the Vietnam war, but at no time did he submit to these powers. He always maintained an independent Vietnam. Does this make him weak for accepting Chinese aid? He was very adamant about no Chinese intervention in the war. Just like China was having none of the American troops or decision making for China.

I'm not sure how switching to American's side makes us a slave, or weak.

Ho Chi Minh was dead before. He didn't know that Mao/Deng should shaked hands with Nixon, imperialists of America first. No where were american communists in banquet in Peking in 1972.

Ho chi Minh is too naive.
 
I think Russia has a better chance than the US or China to have influence in Vietnam.

As for the big issue of South China Sea oil it seems Russia has already signed agreements with Vietnam.

So now Russia and the US are going to back countries in their territorial disputes with China.
 
iT was Nixon who wanted to normalize relationship with China.

with attack on Soviet border 1969 and "ping pong" diplomacy, china showed of her true face to kiss *** of your new master USA 1972.
 
I think Russia has a better chance than the US or China to have influence in Vietnam.

As for the big issue of South China Sea oil it seems Russia has already signed agreements with Vietnam.

So now Russia and the US are going to back countries in their territorial disputes with China.
You're right. Vietnamese love Americans. They will bend over for US support and call you daddy if you want.
 
Back
Top Bottom