Imad.Khan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,961
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
If you read my post i mentioned the entrance flaw but there is not just one entrance but multiple one's and how did u figure they would be blocked for the duration of the war??, debris can be cleared and entrance made operational in a matter of hours or couple of days using heavy machinery and all in all a couple days delay beats loosing multiple assets on the ground forever and there is a difference between expense determination and necessity. Airpower is a strategic asset just like nukes in a war, if we can build such bases for our nukes we can definately do so for our aircraft, its not like iam asking to protect tanks or apcs using underground bases. Without aircover one cannot fight a conventional war.
Well actually i said for the duration of the war or until the entrance is cleared, but that depends on the extent of the damage. I agree that airpower is a strategic asset, infact i will go a step forward and say its more important than nuclear assets. So i agree with you that maybe Pakistan should look into it but it will be very costly and i would prefer for the time being in getting more air assets instead of this.