dbc
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2009
- Messages
- 6,551
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
The same Chinese junk (F-7PG) nailed a US superior tech (F-18) multiple time is AA combat some years ago.
Where and when did that happen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The same Chinese junk (F-7PG) nailed a US superior tech (F-18) multiple time is AA combat some years ago.
The purpose that OP opening the thread is that: Get away from India, China, we have better weapon imported from Russia, your indigenous weapon is crap, we will not be scared by you.Usa vetren question chinease aero engineering ability especially in Avionics radars and stealth
Calling J31 a cheap copy and a J15 a floppy fish and too big to be a carrier borne fighter
Seems chinease are not all that in USA eyes.
Chinese junk? Latest fighter plane from People's Army ticketed for export | Fox News
With this in mind i want to ask the question should PAF resort to obtaning more critical western technology as in the past they have fielded technology then the indians via french fighters and usa fighters versis the indians Russian air power technology.
2 intersting but very important points raised
USA believe TVC is vital in fifth generation fighter something thats avialable on both F22 and PAK FA and indeed the su30mki
And
The chinease J15 is too big a jet for carrier borne operations something that the indians evaluated and went for the smaller mig29k as a result of their research
When F14 was in service in USN, no EMALS, it was SLS, OK?!EMALS vs ski jump.
Usa vetren question chinease aero engineering ability especially in Avionics radars and stealth
Calling J31 a cheap copy and a J15 a floppy fish and too big to be a carrier borne fighter
Seems chinease are not all that in USA eyes.
Chinese junk? Latest fighter plane from People's Army ticketed for export | Fox News
With this in mind i want to ask the question should PAF resort to obtaning more critical western technology as in the past they have fielded technology then the indians via french fighters and usa fighters versis the indians Russian air power technology.
2 intersting but very important points raised
USA believe TVC is vital in fifth generation fighter something thats avialable on both F22 and PAK FA and indeed the su30mki
And
The chinease J15 is too big a jet for carrier borne operations something that the indians evaluated and went for the smaller mig29k as a result of their research
How did the Chinese copy the F-35s without having one?
Its a domestic Chinese design and not a copy.
The same Chinese junk (F-7PG) nailed a US superior tech (F-18) multiple time is AA combat some years ago.
Cyber theft. Chinese has been accused of infiltrating US n/w and stealing designs.
Prove it.
Yeah, like NSA has been doing, right?
I do not believe he meant only China. US has been spying on almost every country. Does India spy on China? You wouldn't know, right?You dont have much for US to spy on technology front. Otherwise is not true.
I do not believe he meant only China. US has been spying on almost every country. Does India spy on China? You wouldn't know, right?
LOL why would NSA spy on India? LCA? Give me a break!Did NSA spying on India to get LCA technology?
LOL why would NSA spy on India? LCA? Give me a break!
You wouldn't know what they spy on, neither would I. How do we come to a conclusion then? They could spy on Germany? How about France? How about on GB? Japan?
Then you have no clue of American technology. Have you heard of the Nautilus and Aurora aircraft and their capabilities? Or even the craft called the Pumpkin Seed? Are you aware of their Black projects and what goes on in Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works and Boeing's Phantom Works? Do you know the billions of dollars that are being spent on these Black projects having cutting edge tech that is years ahead of anything known to mainstream science and technology?My personal opinion is US tech isn't as great as they believe it is and Chinese military hardware is not as inferior as they think it is. Remember, Americans have only used their military against far inferior enemies and, to me, have never been really tested. I'm not saying the Chinese have superior tech or anything, but I bet the Chinese won't be building any equipment in any quantity, if it wasn't able to compete with American weapons.
I think Americans are really worried about Chinese capability, that's why they're trying to disparage Chinese technological efforts to maintain their own image of technological supremacy, especially to Allies who rely on them for security. If Americans were so truly powerful, they wouldn't have to try to convince everyone of it.
I am sure your English is much better than mine, for reasons you best know.Can you comprehend simple English?