USA killed civilians including women and children in pawan air strike.

[Star Wars]

You showed yourself to be incapable of debating this issue logically and rationally when you claimed the Taliban never attacked Afghan civilians, which is not true considering the weekly news of suicide bombings and schoolgirl killings.

So yes, that made you a Taliban sympathizer in my view.

Right.... anyone who opposes actions of America is a Taliban sympathiser.....or anyone who objects to America's killing of civilians is a Taliban sympathiser... was those women and children taliban sympathizers ? or maybe the wedding party in Yemen ? You people are too trigger happy when labeling someone a terrorist ... So in afganistan we have Tailban killing civilians who are terrorists but America killing civilians who are warriors of liberty/freedom /righteousness and all that good stuff ..................... Hypocrite.............

 

[Secularpakistani]

Is there any evidence that these women and children's where Taliban ?

Don,t waste your time because he is a typical patriotic american from the majority who will never accept truth.

 

[gambit]

Is there any evidence that these women and children's where Taliban ?

There lies the problem in your argument: You presume that we deliberately target women and children by labeling them 'Taliban' when it is well known that Taliban fighters do not remove themselves from civilian gatherings.

 

[Secularpakistani]

Right.... anyone who opposes actions of America is a Taliban sympathiser.....or anyone who objects to America's killing of civilians is a Taliban sympathiser... was those women and children taliban sympathizers ? or maybe the wedding party in Yemen ? You people are too trigger happy when labeling someone a terrorist ... So in afganistan we have Tailban killing civilians who are terrorists but America killing civilians who are warriors of liberty/freedom /righteousness and all that good stuff ..................... Hypocrite.............

NIce comment buddy .Well done and you have nailed him hard.Anyone who go against their national interest is simply a terrorist.

 

[gambit]

Right.... anyone who opposes actions of America is a Taliban sympathiser.....or anyone who objects to America's killing of civilians is a Taliban sympathiser... was those women and children taliban sympathizers ? or maybe the wedding party in Yemen ? You people are too trigger happy when labeling someone a terrorist ... So in afganistan we have Tailban killing civilians who are terrorists but America killing civilians who are warriors of liberty/freedom /righteousness and all that good stuff ..................... Hypocrite.............

Refusal to debate rationally deserves equal extreme. As if this topic have not been debated before.

 

[Spring Onion]

There lies the problem in your argument: You presume that we deliberately target women and children by labeling them 'Taliban' when it is well known that Taliban fighters do not remove themselves from civilian gatherings.

wrong wars lead to wrong actions.

I wont comment on moral side of it because we also suffer the same but again this is a wrong war

 

[gambit]

NIce comment buddy .Well done and you have nailed him hard.Anyone who go against their national interest is simply a terrorist.

It is not just US, but non-US human rights organizations have conceded that more Afghan civilians have been killed by the Taliban than by US errors in fighting the Taliban. But for you: The Taliban never killed any Afghan civilians.

wrong wars lead to wrong actions.

I wont comment on moral side of it because we also suffer the same but again this is a wrong war

But that does not mean the 'right' war will automatically produce 'right' actions. What constitute a 'right' action anyway?

 

[Star Wars]

There lies the problem in your argument: You presume that we deliberately target women and children by labeling them 'Taliban' when it is well known that Taliban fighters do not remove themselves from civilian gatherings.

think again

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/world/asia/us-drone-strikes-are-said-to-target-rescuers.html?_r=0

Predator Drone Strikes: 50 Civilians Are Killed For Every 1 Terrorist, and the CIA Only Wants to Up Drone Warfare - PolicyMic

 

[Spring Onion]

But that does not mean the 'right' war will automatically produce 'right' actions. What constitute a 'right' action anyway?

No war is right ever

But your govts have been feeding self-made fears to your public for approval of boosting the weapon industry leading to creation of war every now and then. In the process you end up even supporting AL-QAEDA democrats .

 

[Secularpakistani]

It is not just US, but non-US human rights organizations have conceded that more Afghan civilians have been killed by the Taliban than by US errors in fighting the Taliban. But for you: The Taliban never killed any Afghan civilians.

Now see still you are shamelessly defending the killings of those innocent afghans.Congratulations go drink and dance infront of a white house with a american flag in your hand because you have just managed to blow up the whole face of that unarmed afghan woman and killed all his family members.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Afghan government report on US airstrike called into question | Al Jazeera America

"But Parwan Gov. Basir Salangi told AFP last week that six civilians had died, and he accused the head of the investigation team, parliament member Abdul Satar Khawasi, of being a "treacherous liar" for exaggerating the death toll."

Afghan Journalist's Union Condemns Khawasi's 'Jihad' Against Media

 

[gambit]

think again

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/world/asia/us-drone-strikes-are-said-to-target-rescuers.html?_r=0

Predator Drone Strikes: 50 Civilians Are Killed For Every 1 Terrorist, and the CIA Only Wants to Up Drone Warfare - PolicyMic

Do you even read and more importantly THINK LOGICALLY of your own sources?

British and Pakistani journalists said Sunday that the C.I.A.’s drone strikes on suspected militants in Pakistan have repeatedly targeted rescuers who responded to the scene of a strike, as well as mourners at subsequent funerals.

This presume -- falsely -- that we clearly ID-ed the rescuers as rescuers when it could be and probably was a case of mistaken identity. When a journalist wrote the word 'rescuer', it is not logical that the drone operators also know of the same.

If we wanted to target women and children just because they are women and children, why drones in the first place? Why not carpet bombings like we did to the Iraqi military?

Now see still you are shamelessly defending the killings of those innocent afghans.Congratulations go drink and dance infront of a white house because you have just managed to blow up the whole face of that unarmed afghan woman and killed all his family members.

Is this true...???

Roadside bomb kills 6 Afghan civilians - Asia news - Boston.com

A roadside bomb killed six civilians and wounded more than a dozen others in southern Afghanistan, authorities said Sunday, hours after a suicide bomber killed four in an attack on a military bus in the capital.

So what was it you said that the Taliban does not kill civilians?

 

[Star Wars]

Do you even read and more importantly THINK LOGICALLY of your own sources?


This presume -- falsely -- that we clearly ID-ed the rescuers as rescuers when it could be and probably was a case of mistaken identity. When a journalist wrote the word 'rescuer', it is not logical that the drone operators also know of the same.

If we wanted to target women and children just because they are women and children, why drones in the first place? Why not carpet bombings like we did to the Iraqi military?

Point being you assume you are attacking terrorists and bomb them away...to hell with intelligence gathering... Whats the result..innocent women and children being killed ... Is it worth it to kill so many civilians just to kill 1 alleged terrorist

 

[gambit]

No war is right ever

But your govts have been feeding self-made fears to your public for approval of boosting the weapon industry leading to creation of war every now and then. In the process you end up even supporting AL-QAEDA democrats .

Why not? The Muslims have been feeding themselves self made fears about the Jews and US infidels for decades for public approval to buy weapons from the Russians and the Chinese. You want to go that route?

 

[BigDaddyWatch]

There lies the problem in your argument: You presume that we deliberately target women and children by labeling them 'Taliban' when it is well known that Taliban fighters do not remove themselves from civilian gatherings.

Your a guy that fits the bill of "Right or wrong my country" perfectly. If tomorrow the US drops an atomic bomb on someone you will be here to defend it. We know that drone operators have difficulty distinguishing between civilians and fighters and this is not the first time that drone strikes killed innocent civilians. And its not only happening in Pakistan. In fact the majority of the people killed by drones are innocent civilians. So the US know that they are killing innocent civilians and not to mention violating international law by violating other countries sovereignty. And yet the US is keep doing it. And the fact that there are Americans who defend their countries killing of innocent people in multiple countries shows you the callousness of the Americans. Not just the government but also its people who are either to ignorant to know or just too callas to care. America is just a nation of the ignorant led by the immoral.