What's new

US won't sit idle if India-China conflict breaks out

I don't understand, why does India always need America or Russia to protect her?
Its called diplomacy. We have used it for great effect in 1971. When enemy is 10 times bigger than you, unite power of enemy's enemies to divide enemy's strength. It works! Just ask Pakistani what happened in '71.
 
.
China needs to test it's military and a minor conflict with India will do. they'll get to test their logistics system and communication network.

we need to sit back and study this.
loads white wannabe Indian here will be very sad of what you've just posted`````:lol:
 
.
India's nukes are firecrackers.

The DN3 with MKV is sufficient to take care of it.

View attachment 414353

Where is the evidence of interception? You have none.

All US GMD tests are rigged.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-missile-defense-flaw-20170226-story.html

PS, China got the super genius like Ma Weiming who has mastered the DC electrical system which is the key to pave the road for the future energy weapons, whereas the US is running out of talents.

You keep telling yourself that Tiger. I annihilated your arguments in that other thread, and yet you still lie and mislead people. You don't have a clue.
 
.
India's nukes are firecrackers.

The DN3 with MKV is sufficient to take care of it.

View attachment 414353

Lemme guess, you are basing all your bravado on an unconfirmed Chinese cell phone caputred video which can be of anything. How did you actually established that this video was of missile interception drill of any kind? More so of mid course interception?

They haven't crossed the threshold of the thermonuclear weapon, unlike the P5 members.

China spends less than 2% of its GDP, yet rivalling the US in everything.

A 200 Kiloton fusion boosted fisson bomb is very much in India's arsenal. Deploying it using missiles and fighters/bombers is very much possible. And few 200 kiloton bombs are sufficient to cripple China's ambitions for grandure. China will loose more in nuclear war with India, because China has more to loose. Simple.
 
. .
The Type 055 costs 0.9 billion, whereas your inferior Flight IIA costs nearly 2 billion.

China can produce the most powerful supercomputer, first quantum communication, why not the best anti-missile systems?
Inferior? US Burkes can conduct simultaneous air and ballistic missile defense. As well as plug into the NIFC-CA battle network, a network that China can't come close to replicating anytime soon.

I've seen little evidence that China has fielded weapons as advanced such as the tri-capable SM-6, SM-3 Block IA/B/IIA. The US will even surpass China in anti-ship cruise missile capability with the fielding of LRASM, a capability that China is supposed to excel in. LRASM has superior range, stealth, and advanced AI capabilities.
Burkes also field advanced cyber and EW capabilities with SEWIP Block 2/3 and Paragon/Graywing systems.

Don't equate India with USA and Russia, since they barely have a functional nuclear arsenal.

China is basically acquiring everything the US has, including something you don't have, and our military expenditure remains one third of yours.

The Soviet Union also "acquired everything the US" had. They also had quantitative superiority, especially in Europe. Far larger than what China fields today. None of this meant they achieved technological parity with the US. Fielding a J-20 doesn't equate to an F-35 or F-22.

CTiger is the same guy that said the US railgun is not a real railgun because it didn't look "pure" enough to him.
 
.
. .
Inferior? US Burkes can conduct simultaneous air and ballistic missile defense. As well as plug into the NIFC-CA battle network, a network that China can't come close to replicating anytime soon.

I've seen little evidence that China has fielded weapons as advanced such as the tri-capable SM-6, SM-3 Block IA/B/IIA. The US will even surpass China in anti-ship cruise missile capability with the fielding of LRASM, a capability that China is supposed to excel in. LRASM has superior range, stealth, and advanced AI capabilities.
Burkes also field advanced cyber and EW capabilities with SEWIP Block 2/3 and Paragon/Graywing systems.



The Soviet Union also "acquired everything the US" had. They also had quantitative superiority, especially in Europe. Far larger than what China fields today. None of this meant they achieved technological parity with the US. Fielding a J-20 doesn't equate to an F-35 or F-22.

CTiger is the same guy that said the US railgun is not a real railgun because it didn't look "pure" enough to him.

Burke is an old platform that has already reaches its full potential limit, while the Type 055 is by far a superior platform that designated for the 21st century warfare.

J-20 is beyond F-22, and it never took F-22 as its peer.

Lemme guess someone photographs some strange phenomenon in sky, be it a weather balloon or rocket test or failed fireworks and everyone thinks it is a mid course interception. Yeah right! :rollseyes:

Because you Indians will never get anything like this.
 
.
Because you Indians will never get anything like this.
Yes, because our government announces successful/unsuccessful interception tests when they conduct it. Its an open democracy you know. We do not need to hide tanks behind Big Yellow Ducks.

BTW, that raises question. Even if it was a missile interception test, how do you know if it was successful? In the sense if it were, Chinese mouth pieces will be foaming and frothing like no tomorrow.
 
.
@ChineseTiger1986

Save yourself the time and (potential) embarrassment.

Even if the Chinese did achieve technological parity with the United States on paper, it will be decades until it could accumulate enough naval/air/space platforms incorporating those breakthrough technologies to stand toe-to-toe with the US. You are talking about six J-20s, one (technically zero as of now) Type 055, six Type 052D, etc., facing off against 178 F-22s, some 200+ F-35s, 63 Arleigh-Burkes, 20+ Ticonderogas, a Zumwalt, and a lot more. The United States holds and will continue to hold a near-insurmountable advantage in quality and quantity so long as its military budget stays well above that of China.

You are also forgetting that the United States has been active in circumventing Chinese area denial technologies. The LRASM, SM-6, UCLASS, Virginia SSN upgrades, and JASSM-ER (upgraded) are some of the fruits of that labor. The Chinese DN-series midcourse interceptors, HQ-26, Type 055, and quite a number of the weapons platforms you've mentioned are not technically in Chinese service yet.
 
.
Yes, because our government announces successful/unsuccessful interception tests when they conduct it. Its an open democracy you know. We do not need to hide tanks behind Big Yellow Ducks.

BTW, that raises question. Even if it was a missile interception test, how do you know if it was successful? In the sense if it were, Chinese mouth pieces will be foaming and frothing like no tomorrow.

Talk something like extra-terrestrial weapon to you is totally pointless.
 
. .
Talk something like extra-terrestrial weapon to you is totally pointless.
Yes because I do not believe in extra-terrestrial weapons. BTW, are you alluding to alien origin of Chinese 'anti-missile' capabilities? My oh my, I didn't know Chinese are copying aliens these days :rofl:
 
.
Burke is an old platform that has already reaches its full potential limit, while the Type 055 is by far a superior platform that designated for the 21st century warfare.

J-20 is beyond F-22, and it never took F-22 as its peer.



Because you Indians will never get anything like this.

The Burkes are set to upgrade to a Flight 3, whose centerpiece is the SPY-6 Radar, which is 30 times more powerful than current Burke radars.

p1695425.jpg


The J-20 is beyond the F-22 and is not a peer? Your just embarrassing yourself now.

What's sad is you will continue to lie and mislead people.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom