US won't sit idle if India-China conflict breaks out

[ChineseTiger1986]

you will fry yourself as well if you escalate war with another nuclear power. you should stick to bullying smaller countries.

India's nukes are firecrackers.

The DN3 with MKV is sufficient to take care of it.

 

[xyxmt]

US will do what it did in south china Sea

nothing

 

[艹艹艹]

When India withdrew its troops, it was hoped that the Indians would continue to be happy！

 

[C130]

India's nukes are firecrackers.

The DN3 with MKV is sufficient to take care of it.

View attachment 414353

I like how China thinks. we can lose 1,000,000 people, but that still leaves us with 300,000,000. the glass is half full mindset.

 

[omegalamba7XL9]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-breaks-out-experts/articleshow/59776785.cms

BEIJING: The US is not likely to be an idle witness in the case of a military conflict between India and China and it might take actions to put pressure on Beijing, two experts told TNN in interviews.

"I do not think that the United States would become involved in a border conflict between China and India, but I do think that an increasingly competitive China-India dynamic is likely to lead to increased security cooperation between the United States and India," Zack Cooper, senior fellow at the Washington based Center for Strategic and International Studies told TNN.

Cooper said the US is trying to balance against China's growing power and India can play a major role in this balancing effort.

"In that sense, if China continues to pursue its claims against India, Beijing risks creating an anti-China balancing coalition of its own making," he said. "In my view, Beijing would be wise to de-escalate the crisis and resolve the stalemate without a violent conflict," he added.

Rising military competition between the US and China has kept Beijing engaged in recent weeks. The US might enhance its naval presence in case of a conflict in the India-China border, analysts said.

"Should the ongoing push and shove turn into a hot war, Washington is expected to provide logistical, intelligence and material support to India's military," said Mohan Malik, professor of Asia-Pacific Center for Security in Honolulu. "It might even dispatch an aircraft carrier and submarines to the Indian Ocean to monitor and deter Chinese naval assets," he said.

Chinese concerns about the US taking sides with India were reflected in a commentary in government backed Global Times on Wednesday.

"There are certain forces in the West that are instigating a military clash between China and India, from which they can seek strategic benefits at no cost to themselves. Washington applied this scheme in the South China Sea disputes," it said.


Malik said some Chinese strategic thinkers are favouring a short war would give India a bloody nose while helping China take forward its goal of achieving a Sino-centric regional order in Asia.

Awww that's what you call ra*di rona, calling on big daddy what happened to the Supaaa powaaaa? A little movement of PLA and all the air out of 56 inch chest.

I like how China thinks. we can lose 1,000,000 people, but that still leaves us with 300,000,000. the glass is half full mindset.

Hey certainly worked for Stallin in Ww2, power in numbers.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I like how China thinks. we can lose 1,000,000 people, but that still leaves us with 300,000,000. the glass is half full mindset.

The MKV and the powerful anti-missile laser in the near future is to ensure that China won't lose people even in a possible nuclear warfare scenario.

 

[C130]

The MKV and the powerful anti-missile laser in the near future is to ensure that China won't lose people even in a possible nuclear warfare scenario.

U.S got the most advance anti-missile systems and admits it can't stop advance MIRV ICBM,s so I doubt China will have anything better in the future. the nukes will get through

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

U.S got the most advance anti-missile systems and admits it can't stop advance MIRV ICBM,s so I doubt China will have anything better in the future. the nukes will get through

All US GMD tests are rigged.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-missile-defense-flaw-20170226-story.html

PS, China got the super genius like Ma Weiming who has mastered the DC electrical system which is the key to pave the road for the future energy weapons, whereas the US is running out of talents.

 

[C130]

All US GMD tests are rigged.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-missile-defense-flaw-20170226-story.html

PS, China got the super genius like Ma Weiming who has mastered the DC electrical system which is the key to pave the road for the future energy weapons, whereas the US is running out of talents.

rigged? like I said U.S and current anti defense missiles are only good at defeating ICBM with a single warhead.
without the U.S trailblazing China will have spend 10x more developing these projects from scratch, and that still doesn't guarantee you'll stop a massive nuclear attack.

you can launch nukes from aircraft (dumb bombs) (missiles)
you can launch nukes from rockets with a high trajectory which makes intercepting nearly impossible
you can launch nukes from rockets that can carry 5 to 15 MIRVS and dozens of decoys that mimic a warhead
you can launch nukes from cruise missiles that fly low to the ground and in mountain valleys
you can launch nukes from submarines that are only a few hundred kilometers off your coast (you only have minutes to react)

I find it foolish if any country thinks it's anti-missile system will stop another country that has 100s of nukes and multiple ways to launch them.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

rigged? like I said U.S and current anti defense missiles are only good at defeating ICBM with a single warhead.
without the U.S trailblazing China will have spend 10x more developing these projects from scratch, and that still doesn't guarantee you'll stop a massive nuclear attack.

you can launch nukes from aircraft (dumb bombs) (missiles)
you can launch nukes from rockets with a high trajectory which makes intercepting nearly impossible
you can launch nukes from rockets that can carry 5 to 15 MIRVS and dozens of decoys that mimic a warhead
you can launch nukes from cruise missiles that fly low to the ground and in mountain valleys
you can launch nukes from submarines that are only a few hundred kilometers off your coast (you only have minutes to react)

I find it foolish if any country thinks it's anti-missile system will stop another country that has 100s of nukes and multiple ways to launch them.

The Type 055 costs 0.9 billion, whereas your inferior Flight IIA costs nearly 2 billion.

China can produce the most powerful supercomputer, first quantum communication, why not the best anti-missile systems?

 

[C130]

The Type 055 costs 0.9 billion, whereas your inferior Flight IIA costs nearly 2 billion.

China can produce the most powerful supercomputer, first quantum communication, why not the best anti-missile systems?

what does Type 055 have anything to do with this? aren't we talking anti missiles?? compare your missiles to SM-3IIA,THAAD, and GMD, and these things aren't cheap. not even China cheaper labor makes up for that.

my point is it's cheaper to build a missile/nuclear warhead than it is to build a missile system that kills it.

but if you China thinks it can stop a massive nuclear attack then by all means attack India,U.S, and Russia. you can wipe us all out and not suffer a single death

 

[KAL-EL]

what does Type 055 have anything to do with this? aren't we talking anti missiles?? compare your missiles to SM-3IIA,THAAD, and GMD, and these things aren't cheap. not even China cheaper labor makes up for that.

my point is it's cheaper to build a missile/nuclear warhead than it is to build a missile system that kills it.

but if you China thinks it can stop a massive nuclear attack then by all means attack India,U.S, and Russia. you can wipe us all out and not suffer a single death

Only a delusional PDF keyboard Warrior would think his/her country could launch a massive nuclear attack on another country with a massive or even semi massive nuclear Arsenal and not receive any massive casualties (destroyed cities) in response.

I've been on PDF for 4 years now. And I'm still astounded by some here who seem to live in their own alternate reality video game Fantasyland.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

what does Type 055 have anything to do with this? aren't we talking anti missiles?? compare your missiles to SM-3IIA,THAAD, and GMD, and these things aren't cheap. not even China cheaper labor makes up for that.

my point is it's cheaper to build a missile/nuclear warhead than it is to build a missile system that kills it.

but if you China thinks it can stop a massive nuclear attack then by all means attack India,U.S, and Russia. you can wipe us all out and not suffer a single death

Don't equate India with USA and Russia, since they barely have a functional nuclear arsenal.

China is basically acquiring everything the US has, including something you don't have, and our military expenditure remains one third of yours.

 

[C130]

Don't equate India with USA and Russia, since they barely have a functional nuclear arsenal.

China is basically acquiring everything the US has, including something you don't have, and our military expenditure remains one third of yours.

India got 100+ nukes even if they are less than 100 kilo in power each. India has 4 different ways to deliver them. they are a threat to you and the world if they wanted to use them.

China like the U.S is drowning in debt. spend more on your military it won't matter in the end. guess it's better than building thousands of buildings that go empty or are demolished then rebuilt again just to be demolished again, lmao.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

India got 100+ nukes even if they are less than 100 kilo in power each. India has 4 different ways to deliver them. they are a threat to you and the world if they wanted to use them.

China like the U.S is drowning in debt. spend more on your military it won't matter in the end. guess it's better than building thousands of buildings that go empty or are demolished then rebuilt again just to be demolished again, lmao.

They haven't crossed the threshold of the thermonuclear weapon, unlike the P5 members.

China spends less than 2% of its GDP, yet rivalling the US in everything.