US will 'take its own action' in Syria if UN fails to do so, envoy warns

[takeitwithyou]

an indian ABCD acting as "owner of America" makes people laugh. Pun aside, good percentage of US population are against what US did in Iraq, Libya and Syria. That means, self proclaimed indian "owner" ready to kick vast number of Americans so hindutva brigade can impose bigoted rule on land of free. ISIS a US creation is well documented fact.

Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq

and guess what, curry gets even thicker and smelly - india was supplying weapons and explosive to ISIS and giving shelter to ISIS terrorists.
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/...islamic-state-to-make-explosives-report-says/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/1...-federal-reserve-bank-in-nyc-sources-say.html

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/singapore-arrests-27-bangladeshis-on-terrorism-suspicions.html

http://northiowatoday.com/2016/10/1...-attempting-to-kill-a-member-of-u-s-military/

 

[Falcon29]

America has the great ability to destroy nations but they also lose wars. Since ww2 they have lost every war that have fought.
All empires eventually come to an end for one reason or another. America is no different.
The world doesn't see what the real problems are and almost all start in tel Aviv and finish at the doors of the Whitehouse

America is not an empire and it won't come to an end. The US will not intervene in Syria, it has no alternative to Assad. If it did intervene, Iran can't do anything about it.

 

[VFY]

The US needs to provide Stingers with GPS & Kill Switch.
GPS to make them work only in designated areas
and Kill Switch to disable them when they have done the job.

Interesting. How come the US/CIA has not done this already? Will this not risk those stingers getting into the hands of al-Qaeda/ISIS and other groups who could use this against US troops already in the area?

If it did intervene, Iran can't do anything about it.

Don't be so sure about that. There's also the Russia factor. America is already intervening in Syria but to a lesser degree. Not sure if there would be an escalation which would include US troops moving into Damascus.

 

[Akasa]

Just as it plans to do in North Korea, presumably?

 

[Falcon29]

Don't be so sure about that. There's also the Russia factor. America is already intervening in Syria but to a lesser degree. Not sure if there would be an escalation which would include US troops moving into Damascus.

US will not intervene militarily. It has no interest in letting various militias take over Syria. It will try getting Assad to drop down, and more importantly, make some UN setup government in Syria, that will remove most of the people currently holding the power of the state. Then bribe some military folk, and just work from there. Then get certain rebels to do operations against more radical ones, then disarm everyone. And then have what they want from there. That's the only plan the US and allies have. They can't implement it without use of force. And they won't use force, because of Russian intervention and also no post-war plan. So they will not intervene.

 

[idune]

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/1...-federal-reserve-bank-in-nyc-sources-say.html

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/singapore-arrests-27-bangladeshis-on-terrorism-suspicions.html

http://northiowatoday.com/2016/10/1...-attempting-to-kill-a-member-of-u-s-military/

now lone wolf idiots who were lured by US intel is some kind of indian defense/logic against the fact - ISIS was created by US and arms were supplied by india. No wonder US stopped importing indian programmers.

US will not intervene militarily.

If US does, it will come down to confronting Russia and "Ivan" is ready and waiting; US knows that. This is just a stunt (at cost of 100s of Syrian lives) and throwing bones (of rhetoric) to its arab financiers so that fund keep coming. In reality, Russians, Syrians and Iranians for that matter are already immune to US "all option in the table" line.

 

[The SC]

Didn't the US monitor and destructed all Syrian chemical weapons?
Where is Russia in all of this? And Usrael proxies (since everyone seems to have a hand or at least a finger in Syria's war)?

Who is this spokeswoman Ambassador of the US to the UN Nikki Haley :

US Ambassador to the UN comes out swinging on Israel bias

Haley’s courage and moral vision come to the UN at a time when Israel’s standing in the world is changing.

In her first press briefing, US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley came out swinging.

After sharing with reporters impressions from her first Security Council meeting on Middle East issues (“it was a bit strange”), Haley vowed that the US would no longer turn a blind eye to the UN’s outrageous bias against the Jewish state.

“We will not repeat the mistake of [Security Council] Resolution 2334 [which castigated Israel for settlement building], instead we will push for action on the real threats in the Middle East.”

Haley mentioned Hezbollah’s illegal buildup of rockets in Lebanon, the money and weapons Iran provides to terrorists, strategies for defeating ISIS, and holding Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad accountable for the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of civilians.

None of these issues was raised at the meeting, Haley noted, yet the council did find the time to castigate Israel.

Throughout her short comment, the former governor of South Carolina articulated her criticisms respectfully, never once deviating from polite Southern etiquette.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/JPost-Editorial-Haley-at-Turtle-Bay-482114

 

[Star Expedition]

If the USA thinks Syria is much smaller than Vietnam, he may be wrong.

 

[Trango Towers]

America is not an empire and it won't come to an end. The US will not intervene in Syria, it has no alternative to Assad. If it did intervene, Iran can't do anything about it.

Empires are not only in the shape of concurred lands. Today's world of empires is different. Control is done through politics and finance. America is an empire and it controls vast lands beyond its borders.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/1...-federal-reserve-bank-in-nyc-sources-say.html

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/singapore-arrests-27-bangladeshis-on-terrorism-suspicions.html

http://northiowatoday.com/2016/10/1...-attempting-to-kill-a-member-of-u-s-military/

You quote Fox news. That's like quoting the Jerry Springer show. Your intellect is now apparent. Same channel that reports things like no go areas in Birmingham due to.Muslims. slapped down by David Cameron

 

[Arsalan mehmud]

Why US forgets Myanmar and remember Syria, Libya... because of Oil...
Allah knows who used these chemical weapons but whoever had done it, Allah should destroy them.. amin...

 

[T-72M1]

The neocons smell blood with this chemical incident, the clinton news network is going ballistic.

Big test for Trump, good thing he has no option but to confront the Russians militarily, something which he isn't inclined toward. He's not going to be able to co-opt Putin into abandoning his allies in Iran/Syria either.

I think this was either a false flag or they hit a rebel chemical dump, tragic, but will be forgotten and the US' sole focus will return to fighting the Islamic State.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Interesting. How come the US/CIA has not done this already? Will this not risk those stingers getting into the hands of al-Qaeda/ISIS and other groups who could use this against US troops already in the area?

Don't be so sure about that. There's also the Russia factor. America is already intervening in Syria but to a lesser degree. Not sure if there would be an escalation which would include US troops moving into Damascus.

I am not sure such devices exists.

If they did, the Kill Switch would disable the Stingers as soon as a USAF plane were nearby.
I guess that the area where they could be used could be narrowly defined,
so you could designate real small no fly areas. I.E: around the hospitals for the gassed victims.
This was bombed right afterwards.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

It would be a violation of Syria's own government , and since Russia is also present in region would not be an ideal fit or reasonable choice

Russia worked hard in 1.5 years to bring peace to a very destabalized Area , and it is not in general interest of many countries that any destabalizing force is allowed to cause more chaos

Certain natiosn who don't get along with Hafiz Al Assad , or North Korean head of state should try to sort the disagreement on table of dicussion. It is a reasonable thing to do

And don't drag rest of the world in your own personal Agenda or feeling with individual leaders of countries.

 

[maximuswarrior]

I disagree with Obama or any US interference. US need to focus on itself instead of being the world policeman.

I agree, but after all the meddling it is too late. The Americans have stirred the hornet's nest long ago and for too long. Regime change and occupation of foreign lands is a thing of the past. The Americans won't succeed anymore.

 

[salarsikander]

Pardon me young man, but nobody has killed more Muslims than your fellow clan, and all in the name of a religion. In fact, you create havoc in every country you guys reside in. Look at terror acts your people have done in Netherlands too. We need to make sure we find ways to limit your exposure in our western countries(at a min in the U.S) and stay out you fellas killing each other. Lastly, you don't worry your head about my country (sole superpower and the richest)- just don't come visit or live here, that's all.

Oh is I now?
Remember how USinvaded Iraq under false pretetxt ifnWMD, did you find any of those ??

If t weren't to US invasion of Iraq none of the would have happened