US warns Syria against using chemical warfare

[Oldman1]

Hey, hey, the second time Iraq was invaded because Iraq was about to unleash therm o-nuclear weapons upon Washington and London, at least that is what those certified liars said.

Iraq unleashed chemical weapons against his own people and the Iranians. That past was Iraq's downfall. And 9/11 happened. Better to make sure not another 9/11 happens.

 

[hunter_hunted]

to the states its not about a mistake . they need a war ever 10 yrs to ensure their defense industry survives. (i know i will get a lot of flack for this comment ) some of those wars were justified some not. think about it from 1920 they have been involved in a conflict almost ever decade.

Yup if they will not use their weapons than their weapons will get rusty and will explode in time of need like what happened during the Vietnam war the bomb explodes on the runway of aircraft carrier i forgot the name of carrier and the reason was the rusty old world war 1 and 2 bombs.

 

[T-Rex]

Iraq unleashed chemical weapons against his own people and the Iranians.

But was that the reason why Iraq was invaded? No, and the whole world knows that. BTW, the US was aiding Saddam against Iran and Saddam got those chemical weapons used against Iran from the west. So, the west was an accomplice in this crime.

And 9/11 happened. Better to make sure not another 9/11 happens.

History has shown that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, it was all a great lie!

 

[T90TankGuy]

But was that the reason why Iraq was invaded? No, and the whole world knows that. BTW, the US was aiding Saddam against Iran and Saddam got those chemical weapons used against Iran from the west. So, the west was an accomplice in this crime.



History has shown that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, it was all a great lie!

as much as i hate it, i have to agree with you on these two points.

 

[Vassnti]

DAMASCUS: At a Damascus news conference Monday, foreign ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said Syria has chemical weapons and will use them if attacked by outsiders, though not against its own civilians.

Makdissi’s remarks came amid growing international concern that Damascus is preparing to deploy its chemical arsenal in the repression of a 16-month uprising against the Assad regime.

“Syria will not use any chemical or other unconventional weapons against its civilians, and will only use them in case of external aggression,” Makdissi told reporters.

.

Only problem is they keep saying all the fighters are foreign terrorists, that gives a pretty free range of use.

 

[Oldman1]

But was that the reason why Iraq was invaded? No, and the whole world knows that. BTW, the US was aiding Saddam against Iran and Saddam got those chemical weapons used against Iran from the west. So, the west was an accomplice in this crime.


History has shown that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, it was all a great lie!

No the U.S. was not aiding Saddam with chemical weapons. Its a well known fact that the Russians were providing the weapons. Heck you don't even see one American made weapon in Iraq's arsenal in the 80s.

Remember that prior to 1979 we were Iran's ally. Russia was Iraq's supplier.

And I stated that we don't want to see another 9/11.

 

[T-Rex]

No the U.S. was not aiding Saddam with chemical weapons. Its a well known fact that the Russians were providing the weapons. Heck you don't even see one American made weapon in Iraq's arsenal in the 80s.

Remember that prior to 1979 we were Iran's ally. Russia was Iraq's supplier.

I didn't say that the US supplied Iraq chemical weapons, I said that the US supported Iraq against Iran in order to crush Iran's Islamic revolution. One German company supplied the chemical weapons and understandably with american consent. Iran was an american ally before 1979, but the war with Iraq took place after the Islamic revolution in 1979 and that changed everything.

And I stated that we don't want to see another 9/11.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, your statement is designed to misguide people.