What's new

US triggers China’s urgency to strengthen nuclear deterrent: Global Times editorial

Famous actor Martin Sheen reveals us technology from the 1980s that can throw off ICBMs from the target. China is well aware of this. However, Chinese members on PDF are not.

Here is the video on youtube revealing what electronic warfare weapons usa has around the globe, including sats that do this on a smaller scale.


Why do you think I say make dumber than V2 rockets as nuclear parity. And make hundreds of thousands of them and launch them at different locations with an accuracy of 1000 km. Perhaps a scatter shot of advanced well protected IC rockets could work. ICBMs don't work against the usa with the amount and varying EW weapons, DEW, etc that can take down ICBMs from ground to launch to flight to target.

Before trump, this is what libertarian sites hosted, information about the electronic warfare weapons of Washington. Then trump appeared in the white house, and libertarians brains are mush believing that trump is fighting the cia (deep state) and is for traditional isolationism/anti-sanctions/live and let live, and supports peace.

Are Microwave Transmission Weapons Of Mass Destruction Being Used To Trigger Catastrophic Earthquakes?

November 15, 2016 83 Comments

5tt.png


Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org
Are unimaginably powerful microwave transmissions actively and aggressively being used as weapons of mass destruction? If all available evidence is examined, the logical conclusions are chilling. Understanding the full potential of the power that can be projected from the ionosphere heater installations (like HAARP) is difficult and complex. We all know and understand that microwave transmissions produced in our countertop ovens can heat a cup of water (or frozen TV dinners) at blinding speed. Unfortunately, most don't know and thus have never even considered (let alone investigated) what massively powerful and interlinked microwave transmissions can do to the planet. When immensely powerful microwave transmissions are bounced off the atmosphere (facilitated by the atmospheric aerosol saturation) and directed back into the Earth's strata (in a seismically sensitive location), the triggering of seismic activity becomes scientifically possible. The constant jet aircraft spraying of reflective and electrically conductive particles into the atmosphere (as part of the ongoing climate engineering/geoengineering assault) is a verifiable fact. Is New Zealand, yet again, the victim of microwave transmission super-weapons? There is a long list of shocking facts surrounding a number of recent catastrophic earthquakes. It is imperative to examine these facts without preconceptions or programmed denial. Let's start with the month leading up to the extremely destructive 2010 earthquake in Haiti, MIT satellite monitoring detected a radical increase in ULF (ultra low frequency/microwave) radio transmissions over the quake epicenter.
Spacecraft Saw ULF Radio Emissions over Haiti before January Quake
A French satellite observed a dramatic increase in ultra low frequency radio waves over Haiti in the month before the M7.0 earthquake earlier this year.
DEMETER’s is an unusual mission. Its job is to monitor low frequency radio waves generated by earthquakes.
Today, a group of geoscientists release the data associated with the M 7.0 earthquake that struck Haiti in January. They say that DEMETER saw a clear increase in ultralow frequency radio waves being emitted from the Earth’s the crust in that region in the build up to the quake.
The anecdotal evidence of electromagnetic effects associated with earthquakes is legion. Various accounts link earthquakes with mysterious light and heating effects.
After the Haiti quake, the US military moved in and occupied the country. In addition, the long drawn-out Clinton Foundation reconstruction debacle began. The following year a deadly earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand. Many circumstances surrounding this disaster were also troubling. Did US officials know the earthquake was coming? Some excerpts from a report on the disaster are below.
Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?
9 members of US Congress were in Christchurch for a summit meeting on Feb 21 & 22 but left Christchurch 2.5 hours before the earthquake hit and relocated to Wellington even though the meeting was not due to finish until the evening of Feb 22nd.
The US Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, was supposed to be visiting Christchurch and speaking at the summit meeting on Feb 22, but on Feb 18 announced she was cancelling her visit 3. The Deputy Administrator of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), Timothy Manning, just happened to be in Christchurch at the time with a US delegation.
All of the rest of the delegation left Christchurch shortly before the quake hit except for Mr Manning who stayed behind, and then after the quake hit he assisted with directing the emergency response. Exactly the same thing happened with FEMA delegates with the Haiti earthquake. In Haiti , the FEMA delegates just happened to be there at the time conducting training exercises for responding to major earthquakes.
Recent releases from Wikileaks resulted in the headline below:
Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advanced Warning of Christchurch Earthquake.
In the days before the catastrophic Japanese Earthquake (that occurred on March 11, 2011), world renowned research institution, MIT, yet again, noted extremely profound and anomalous atmospheric heating directly over the quake epicenter. MIT published the following report:
Atmosphere Above Japan Heated Rapidly Before M9 Earthquake
Infrared emissions above the epicenter increased dramatically in the days before the devastating earthquake in Japan, say scientists.
They say that before the M9 earthquake, the total electron content of the ionosphere increased dramatically over the epicentre, reaching a maximum three days before the quake struck.
At the same time, satellite observations showed a big increase in infrared emissions from above the epicentre, which peaked in the hours before the quake. In other words, the atmosphere was heating up.
Though the science community is desperately trying to link pre-quake atmospheric heating to some unknown phenomenon of an atmospheric coupling with the pressure buildup in the strata, is this a rational conclusion? The much more logical and straightforward conclusion is this, the atmospheric heating is being intentionally created by the global network of ionosphere heaters as immense microwave signals are bounced off of the atmosphere and back down into the planet. Unfortunately, the science community is not allowed to even consider this possibility, let alone talk about it. In the period preceding the decimating Japanese earthquake, US Japanese relations were very strained. The post-quake scenario of US/Japanese relations seemed to suddenly be unquestionable, was there a connection? Was the catastrophic quake just a natural event? Or an engineered warning to Japan?
On the 13th of November, 2016, another catastrophic earthquake struck near Christchurch, New Zealand. The list of troubling questions surrounding this earthquake is long and growing. Below are some quotes from seismologist Anna Kaiser (who is investigating the latest New Zealand earthquake activity):
We don't know what we are dealing with right now but it may be … it involves potentially more than one fault … we need to figure out what was going on before and after the 7.5 magnitude quake…
Kaiser went on to say this:
We're working very hard … this is looking quite complex. The epicenter was possibly just south of the Hope fault, but it did look like "something else was going on.
The seismologist statements are only the beginning, there are many more concerning factors surrounding the latest New Zealand Earthquake that should be considered.
In spite of the unfolding US election circumstances, in the days before the latest New Zealand quake John Kerry first went to Christchurch, and then on to McMurdo Station, Antarctica. The stated purpose of Kerry's visit was to examine the effects of global warming and the record low sea ice, but this trip at this time was criticized by some.
US Secretary of State John Kerry is scheduled to head back to New Zealand after checking out summer in Antarctica.
He's been criticized for heading to such a remote place while the US election riveted the world
He tweeted a photograph of himself boarding C-17 cargo plane in Christchurch saying "headed to Antarctica to see firsthand some of the drastic effects of climate change".
In Antarctica he was scheduled to meet with scientists and researchers at McMurdo Station, the largest research station of the US Antarctic programme, as well as visit surrounding areas on Ross Island, and the US Government's Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station.
He is the first secretary of state and the most senior US government official to ever travel to Antarctica.
He is hosted by the US National Science Foundation, which manages the US Antarctic program me.
9im
In fact Antarctica has just broken a new climate record, with record low winter sea ice. After a peak of 18.5 million square kilometers in late August, sea ice began retreating about a month ahead of schedule and has been setting daily low records through most of September. Though Antarctic sea ice (and global sea ice) are at record shattering low levels, why else might John Kerry go to McMurdo Station at this exact window of time? Could the ionosphere heater (microwave transmission) facility that is constructed at McMurdo be a factor?
0pl
Noctilucent clouds in the skies above Antarctica are an ominous harbinger of the atmospheric damage that is occurring there.
Many are under the belief that HAARP, now labeled IRI, no longer exists Operationally due to the Gakona, AK spin. One must understand that these Frequency Generators are Globally Ubiquitous. There are so many that are of dissimilar designs, and go by different acronyms, it is not seen as functionally one and the same. In the case of McMurdo’s Radome and all of the Radar equipment there; Raytheon has had the contracts beginning to end. The National Science Foundation and Raytheon Polar Services Company are housed in the same building. For years the station has grown. It can house 1258 personnel and an average of 200 winter over.
Raytheon is one of the largest private "defense contractors" on the planet, this corporation is also the holder of numerous climate engineering patents including some that relate directly to ionosphere heaters. The power structure is likely microwaving the skies for a multitude of reasons, none of those reasons are in the interest of the common good.
Shocking atmospheric flashing lights were filmed in the skies above New Zealand as the massive Earthquake was occurring.

Kerry returned to Christchurch from Antarctica, and then promptly (and conveniently) departed only hours before the catastrophic earthquake struck.
The statement below is from CBS news.
Sec. John Kerry had left the country before it struck, and just landed in Singapore on his way to Oman when news of the quake was reported.
Is it just a coincidence that US officials always seem to safely depart quake impact zones just prior to the event?
Then there is this headline to consider:
World’s Biggest Seismic Testing “Blast” Ship – Amazon Warrior – Parked on top of New Zealand Fault Line
Is this just a coincidence?
Another point of interest, New Zealanders protested against US Oil exploration continued right up to the day before the quake. Then there was the conflict in New Zealand over the visit of a US warship, this story was covered the day before the quake hit.
The New Zealand Prime Minister's apparent apprehension about the US election results just days prior to the quake are also of interest.
Finally, could known massive oil deposits just off the New Zealand coast also be a part of the equation?
Microwave transmission signals/rings near Antarctica are clearly visible in the satellite composite image shown below.
9ik
The regions of New Zealand near the epicenter have been constantly assaulted with aerosols spraying and microwave transmissions.
9il
The uniform ribbing of aerosolized cloud cover is a clear indication of microwave transmission exposure. Though some "official" sources try to explain this type of cloud pattern as being a result of the underlying land topography, this explanation is patently false. The same patterns are now regularly seen over oceans as well as land as is shown in the satellite photo below that was taken of New Zealand directly over the quake region.
0pk
The image below bears testimony to what the global power structure does to those that try to get in the way of their agendas and operations. This photo is of the bridge of the Greenpeace ship "The Rainbow Warrior". It was bombed and sunk by the French Secret Service in order to prevent the ship and its crew from witnessing ongoing illegal and unimaginably destructive nuclear detonations.
9io
Over 2 decades ago I dove alone on the wreck of the Rainbow Warrior, as it laid on the seafloor off the coast of New Zealand. I swam through the area shown above, around the ship, and examined the gapping bomb blast hole in the hull of the once noble vessel. I hovered over the wreck and contemplated the tyranny of those who rule the world. We are all at a crossroads, and the horizon is darkening rapidly. The power structure wields weapons of unimaginable destruction, they can only do so because of the order-followers that carry out their insanity. As the saying goes, "we have seen the enemy, and they are us". It is up to us, the people, all of us, to refuse any further participation in the insanity. It is up to us to fully investigate and fully face the whole truth. It is up to us to prioritize the fight for the greater good because we owe that debt to our children, to the planet, and to the whole. Make your voice heard, while you can, while it can still matter.
DW
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.


usa does economic terrorism against enemies of Washington. And electronic warfare terrorism of severe weather and earthquakes terrorism against enemies, while harming the earth's natural state.
 
Last edited:
.
This is the clearest message yet:

"Yes, these are silos. Yes they're filled. Don't take it seriously? Try it and find out."
No the message is:

We know what you are pulling here. Lying about China to blame China for your own unprovoked aggressive behavior and actions. If China follows up with an actual armsup its you who started it.
 
.
land based nuclear missiles are of no use if you are looking to provide nuclear deterrence using 2nd strike

only SSBN can do that and Chinese SSBN do not conduct deep sea patrols even although China has operated SSBN for decades
Concrete and steel is cheaper the missiles and warheads. Who’s to say, China won’t build a dozen or two dozen more of these fields of 100+ potential silos. This is straight out of the old MX basing shell game strategy. With China’s estimated current level of warhead weights, it could put 2-3 warheads on each DF-41 plus countermeasures. Even if only 5% of the silos have a DF-41 (with only 2-3 warheads) and China builds 20 such fields; it will have 2400 silos that will need to be targeted to ensure 120 missiles and 240-360 warheads are taken out.

They could easily hide even more missiles in the estimated 5000 miles of tunnels (per Professor Karber’s research out of Georgetown university.)

These silo fields are meant to be found by the US, and targeted. They are a meant to be a “sponge”, to absorb any first strike/counter-force strike, in a similar manner to how the three Minuteman fields are sponges as well.

Thry don’t seem to have gone big with their SSBN Fleet...until they can ensure they are quiet enough to act as a survivable 2nd strike capability. They will probably modernize their air based nuclear capabilities in the form of the H-20 bombers, before they build up their SSBN force, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
.
It's good for China to strengthen nuclear arsenal. But China should abandon the 'no first use' policy.
 
.
It's good for China to strengthen nuclear arsenal. But China should abandon the 'no first use' policy.
They may have too much fun when they gather enough to use nukes liberally against Indian cities
 
.
They may have too much fun when they gather enough to use nukes liberally against Indian cities



It’s better to let indians suffer life as indian than putting them out of their misery.
 
.
Remember how I stated if usa uses classified EW weapons that render Chinese missiles useless:


If usa puts CHAMP on everything of value for war, Chinese missiles would not work.

That China would not last 5 hours in a war with Washington, because ADS missiles would not work, J-20 missiles would not work, J-15 missiles would not work, ship missiles from VLS would not work, mobile launch missiles would not work.

So with not anything working for the defense of China, China would have to sue for peace with crushing reparations.

So I war gamed the defense of China and found out that within the means of China, China can buy many months or years of defense, while R&Ding better missiles that would actually work. So during this time of war, China would update and upgrade their current missiles, one by one, to make them functional; with a fortress China defending China from attacks.

There has to be some other defense of China in the meantime or else China get invaded or "shocked and awed".

So what is this new great fortress of China to buy China time.

This would cost less than 60 billion USD per year for ten years, and if Chinese manufacturing declines, China can use lack in the industrial sector with negative industry growth, and get more jobs for Chinese with this plan.

So what is the plan.

(1)

First as air defense, build 1 million of Chinese version of these:


higher altitude - 50k ft or more in ceiling
rate of fire - 30 rounds per minute
manual non-electronic targeting and automatic radar guided in one
each could cost only 300k euros
group them in formations of 20k per city and strategic defense area.

So your naval bases would be protected by 20k flak 88s. Every 1/10 of a second, 1k rounds would be fired at the target, so 10k rounds per 1 second to destroy missiles targeting Chinese industry, navy, power grid, etc.

China can also build more type 85 upgraded versions, to assist in air defense of coastal regions. Also, to protect the flaks.

Make sure each flak can be used with electronic equipment disabled, a manual use.

(2)

200000 of updated versions of these:


Serving as coastal howitzers. Costing 200k euros and weighing 20k kg. Needing the ability for up to 40km+ in range. And to place these on coastal locations, you need a fleet of Mi-26 to transport these 20k kg howitzers to islands and coastal areas. 200000 of 180mm guns along the long coast of China to prevent an invasion. These would be too many targets to destroy. And they need to be out of range of Iowa class battleships - 39km. So rocket assisted artillery capabilities.

And finally...

(3)

1 million upgraded AH4 155mm howitzers artillery, mostly mountain. 200k for Indian front, 200k for Korean front. And 600k to assist the coastal artillery from an invasion. So these would be placed along the coast and manned during time of invasion.

Mass produced and costing less than 200k euros each.

300 billion euros for flak 88s after 10 years of production - 100K made per year
40 billion euros for the coastal 180mm howitzers after 10 years of production - 20k made per year
200 billion euros for many more AH4s after 10 years of production - 100k made per year

The whole point of these are to buy China time to have a safe homeland during war, so China can figure out how to have effective missiles again, so the rest of the war machine can work.

This is your 3 trillion yuan insurance premiums.

I would rate the flaks the most effective. Then coastal artillery.

J-7s/J-10s could be used as drone hunters. To protect from swarm drone attacks. Which is the big threat.

Key is to keep costs low, yet highly effective, practical and functional.'

Perhaps Make some more flaks and type 85 to protect the coastal artillery.

Hypersonics are the main threat. The 20k flaks per city working as one unit with one computer and radar controlling where to fire could take out Mach 5 targets with swarms of 88mm shells in the air. This is why you could never have enough flaks.
 
Last edited:
.
Remember how I stated if usa uses classified EW weapons that render Chinese missiles useless:


If usa puts CHAMP on everything of value for war, Chinese missiles would not work.

That China would not last 5 hours in a war with Washington, because ADS missiles would not work, J-20 missiles would not work, J-15 missiles would not work, ship missiles from VLS would not work, mobile launch missiles would not work.

So with not anything working for the defense of China, China would have to sue for peace with crushing reparations.

So I war gamed the defense of China and found out that within the means of China, China can buy many months or years of defense, while R&Ding better missiles that would actually work. So during this time of war, China would update and upgrade their current missiles, one by one, to make them functional; with a fortress China defending China from attacks.

There has to be some other defense of China in the meantime or else China get invaded or "shocked and awed".

So what is this new great fortress of China to buy China time.

This would cost less than 60 billion USD per year for ten years, and if Chinese manufacturing declines, China can use lack in the industrial sector with negative industry growth, and get more jobs for Chinese with this plan.

So what is the plan.

(1)

First as air defense, build 1 million of Chinese version of these:


higher altitude - 50k ft or more in ceiling
rate of fire - 30 rounds per minute
manual non-electronic targeting and automatic radar guided in one
each could cost only 300k euros
group them in formations of 20k per city and strategic defense area.

So your naval bases would be protected by 20k flak 88s. Every 1/10 of a second, 1k rounds would be fired at the target, so 10k rounds per 1 second to destroy missiles targeting Chinese industry, navy, power grid, etc.

China can also build more type 85 upgraded versions, to assist in air defense of coastal regions. Also, to protect the flaks.

Make sure each flak can be used with electronic equipment disabled, a manual use.

(2)

200000 of updated versions of these:


Serving as coastal howitzers. Costing 200k euros and weighing 20k kg. Needing the ability for up to 40km+ in range. And to place these on coastal locations, you need a fleet of Mi-26 to transport these 20k kg howitzers to islands and coastal areas. 200000 of 180mm guns along the long coast of China to prevent an invasion. These would be too many targets to destroy. And they need to be out of range of Iowa class battleships - 39km. So rocket assisted artillery capabilities.

And finally...

(3)

1 million upgraded AH4 155mm howitzers artillery, mostly mountain. 200k for Indian front, 200k for Korean front. And 600k to assist the coastal artillery from an invasion. So these would be placed along the coast and manned during time of invasion.

Mass produced and costing less than 200k euros each.

300 billion euros for flak 88s after 10 years of production - 100K made per year
40 billion euros for the coastal 180mm howitzers after 10 years of production - 20k made per year
200 billion euros for many more AH4s after 10 years of production - 100k made per year

The whole point of these are to buy China time to have a safe homeland during war, so China can figure out how to have effective missiles again, so the rest of the war machine can work.

This is your 3 trillion yuan insurance premiums.

I would rate the flaks the most effective. Then coastal artillery.

J-7s/J-10s could be used as drone hunters. To protect from swarm drone attacks. Which is the big threat.

Key is to keep costs low, yet highly effective, practical and functional.'

Perhaps Make some more flaks and type 85 to protect the coastal artillery.

Hypersonics are the main threat. The 20k flaks per city working as one unit with one computer and radar controlling where to fire could take out Mach 5 targets with swarms of 88mm bullets in the air. This is why you could never have enough flaks.


When you put dozens of billions into artillery (Flak like arrangement as you said) and you are fielding thousands per area, clearly, you are forgetting the fact that your opponents have extremely large air arms that can reach these and neutralize these, in addition to using stealthy missile. You have to fight the fire with the fire. So in that regards, shouldn't these $ 60 billion not go into building similar tech to bring you up to speed vs. putting them into WWII tech?
 
.


Imagine 20k of these. Have the Chinese figure out the best upgrades for destroying any incoming bomb/ordinance/missile. However, the comparison to the Flak is primarily about AA and inexpensive, to be mass produced. Key is to keep costs low, yet highly effective, practical and functional
 
Last edited:
.
usa has been working 70 years on classified technology that can take down missiles through DEW, EW, etc. China has a couple decades on jamming. Though that is very old technology and level 1 EW.

Remember how I stated if usa uses classified EW weapons that render Chinese missiles useless:

This one's for you zectech. Read the whole article for more info. I know you love EW.:pop:

Meanwhile, a separate study said Chinese researchers were working on an 80-gigawatt EMP weapon – a power output equivalent to four times that generated by the Three Gorges Dam.

“It will put us on par with the Americans,” said Professor Gao Huailin and colleagues from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in the paper published in Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica


 
.
This one's for you zectech. Read the whole article for more info. I know you love EW.:pop:

Meanwhile, a separate study said Chinese researchers were working on an 80-gigawatt EMP weapon – a power output equivalent to four times that generated by the Three Gorges Dam.

“It will put us on par with the Americans,” said Professor Gao Huailin and colleagues from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in the paper published in Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica



This article deserves a thread on its own.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom