What's new

US: There will be consequences for China's South China Sea militarization

Like I said, I'll be happy to send a photo to the administrator of this site to confirm my identity. :lol:

Let's be honest though, I could post my birth certificate and you fools would still keep yapping about Indians.:lol:
Do something like this will be good enough:
upload_2018-5-4_14-43-5.png

The sooner you do this the better we will believe that it is actually done by yourself... Anything else is just your excuses, and nobody cares...
 
. . . .
How did we go from a thread discussing US responses to Chinese aggressive reclamations to people posting their skin color? It's not worth anyone's time to respond to another member whose sole purpose is to distract from the main topic by bringing up nationality, ethnicity, and all that sort of crap.
 
.
The Americans are incapable of doing anything in the SCS. Having a large force and having the will to use the force directly against a powerful opponent is not something the Americans are good at. They will rachet up economic and political costs in China.

But, the problem with that is, they cannot hurt China without hurting themselves. US politics being a giant populist PR show, that's hardly sustainable for them.

So, I anticipate a roller coaster type of behavior from the US side, to which China will have to adjust by ignoring small PR stunts by the US for the sake of political bread crunches while concentrating on the big picture.

That's why most of the US gibberish simply is ignored in Beijing. What China really cares is not showing off. That's why almost all of the bombastic pro or anti-China news comes from the US/Western side.
 
.
How did we go from a thread discussing US responses to Chinese aggressive reclamations to people posting their skin color? It's not worth anyone's time to respond to another member whose sole purpose is to distract from the main topic by bringing up nationality, ethnicity, and all that sort of crap.
Because you have Chinese racists that infest this forum. I just posted that photo, to end this nonsense once and for all. You can thank our resident racists.
 
. .
Sounds like a typical story copied from the history book... Why don't you just say your grand grand grand... parents took the May Flower to get to "America"... Haha..

On the internet, rhetoric/prose/discourse is probably the only way to recognize someone's traits. He/she has shown lots of traits that are being shared by a certain people on this forum. That's the only way we can make such assumptions.

Man, making nuclear weapons is not anything special. Don’t be naive. You as a university graduate should have known it. Yes the people in Vietnam know: in reality you Chinese are capitalists in a silly communist jacket.

Now you are side-stepping from the main line of our debate. I am looking at the present reality, not what could or might have happened. What happened is what we have today, right? So, the present fact is China is a nuclear power with second strike capacity. This makes China rather untouchable.

Now, if, as you suggest, China, as one of the few Communist nations (in Chinese characteristics) in the world, goes down in ashes, what would fall on Vietnam as another one of the few Commie nations?

Do you think changing governance ideology is as easy as changing your shoes?

Now think if the VCP, which means the state of Vietnam with, at least, a large portion of the people are in support of, had the power to choose letting China go down or letting, say, Japan, go down, which one would it choose?

If I were the VCP top person, I would choose Japan to go down. Because, China's going down would mean I would be also going down in flames in a couple of years.

China needs a good excuse to start reclamation on Huangyandao(Scarborough Shoal). The US might just oblidge.

When China needs some strategic move with credible excuse, the US always comes in handy.

They learned propaganda from the Nazis, but they also learned bad strategy-making from them alongside.
 
.
On the internet, rhetoric/prose/discourse is probably the only way to recognize someone's traits. He/she has shown lots of traits that are being shared by a certain people on this forum. That's the only way we can make such assumptions.



Now you are side-stepping from the main line of our debate. I am looking at the present reality, not what could or might have happened. What happened is what we have today, right? So, the present fact is China is a nuclear power with second strike capacity. This makes China rather untouchable.

Now, if, as you suggest, China, as one of the few Communist nations (in Chinese characteristics) in the world, goes down in ashes, what would fall on Vietnam as another one of the few Commie nations?

Do you think changing governance ideology is as easy as changing your shoes?

Now think if the VCP, which means the state of Vietnam with, at least, a large portion of the people are in support of, had the power to choose letting China go down or letting, say, Japan, go down, which one would it choose?

If I were the VCP top person, I would choose Japan to go down. Because, China's going down would mean I would be also going down in flames in a couple of years.
Post 62 El P.:lol:
 
.
On the internet, rhetoric/prose/discourse is probably the only way to recognize someone's traits. He/she has shown lots of traits that are being shared by a certain people on this forum. That's the only way we can make such assumptions.



Now you are side-stepping from the main line of our debate. I am looking at the present reality, not what could or might have happened. What happened is what we have today, right? So, the present fact is China is a nuclear power with second strike capacity. This makes China rather untouchable.

Now, if, as you suggest, China, as one of the few Communist nations (in Chinese characteristics) in the world, goes down in ashes, what would fall on Vietnam as another one of the few Commie nations?

Do you think changing governance ideology is as easy as changing your shoes?

Now think if the VCP, which means the state of Vietnam with, at least, a large portion of the people are in support of, had the power to choose letting China go down or letting, say, Japan, go down, which one would it choose?

If I were the VCP top person, I would choose Japan to go down. Because, China's going down would mean I would be also going down in flames in a couple of years.
This guy has proved himself not a slumdog but a redneck who stays all day and night bashing China... which is also pathetic...
 
. .
This guy has proved himself not a slumdog but a redneck who stays all day and night bashing China... which is also pathetic...
Now I'm a "redneck." An yes I'll expose you racists when and how often I want to.

You never know :lol:. Just look at the way they construct their rhetoric. That's the only way to spot them.
I made you look like a fool, and all I get is a weak and forgettable insult El P? I'm disappointed.:lol:
 
.
Look, Vietnam had been a part of the Tang empire. We reestablished Vietnam after the downfall of the Tang and victory over the Han army. Since then we expand our territory continually until today. Now you can compare the size of the Tang to communist China today. Yes, that sucks.
Excuse me, China now is still much bigger and stronger than tiny Vietnam, we suck? Tang is one of our dynasties, before Tang and after it, there were other dynasties which is bigger or smaller than now, it is our history, but one common things is China alway stronger than tiny Vietnam, and broke you daydream. step on you land and destroy your cities and factories, but now you women still flock to China for marring Chinese, who is loser? hehe.

We can invade and destroy you tiny vietnam one by one, although your history record are chinese, you may can't read now, you are somebody in front of Chinese?:coffee:

Man, making nuclear weapons is not anything special. Don’t be naive. You as a university graduate should have known it. Yes the people in Vietnam know: in reality you Chinese are capitalists in a silly communist jacket.
Yeah, not special thing, but you don't have nuclear weapon, so suck! the silly communist jacket, but you VCP try best to copy, incompetent Vietnamese, always run after China, Suck.
 
.
Now you are side-stepping from the main line of our debate. I am looking at the present reality, not what could or might have happened. What happened is what we have today, right? So, the present fact is China is a nuclear power with second strike capacity. This makes China rather untouchable.

Now, if, as you suggest, China, as one of the few Communist nations (in Chinese characteristics) in the world, goes down in ashes, what would fall on Vietnam as another one of the few Commie nations?

Do you think changing governance ideology is as easy as changing your shoes?

Now think if the VCP, which means the state of Vietnam with, at least, a large portion of the people are in support of, had the power to choose letting China go down or letting, say, Japan, go down, which one would it choose?

If I were the VCP top person, I would choose Japan to go down. Because, China's going down would mean I would be also going down in flames in a couple of years.



When China needs some strategic move with credible excuse, the US always comes in handy.

They learned propaganda from the Nazis, but they also learned bad strategy-making from them alongside.
Believe me, nobody would cry a tear if Ccp goes down the drain, neither in Vietnam nor in Taiwan. China will remain China regardless of changing of leadership. If you ask me, who can better represent Chinese civilization then my answer is clear: Taiwan. For most of Viet people, Taiwan is the true China.

I wish your homeland Taiwan all the best.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom