What's new

US shoots down Iranian Mojer-6 drone in Iraq

Weren't the iranians dancing when US invaded iraq and removed ur enemy saddam?
didn't want to post it again but you left me no choice



I knew you guys feel guilty on your role in attacking Iraq but its not the reason to spread lies about it and blame Iran
these are the route used for the 2003 attack
Iraq_War_2003_Map1.PNG

Iraq_War_2003_Map2.PNG

and now the interesting Image , yes the turkey route
Iraq-War-Map.jpg

now let see what happened
At approximately 05:30 UTC two F-117 Nighthawks from the 8th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron[133] dropped four enhanced, satellite-guided 2,000-pound GBU-27 'Bunker Busters' on the compound. Complementing the aerial bombardment were nearly 40 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from at least four ships, including the Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Cowpens (CG-63), credited with the first to strike,[134] Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG-75), and two submarines in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf.[135]

you see submarine in Persian gulf fire their missiles directly into Iraq but what about the ones in Red Sea can they fire directly into Iraq or you think their missiles fly over Iran !!? For reference here a map of Middle east
MEast-pol.png

now let see the rest of the story
Special Operations forces from the CIA and US Army managed to build and lead the Kurdish Peshmerga into an effective force and assault for the North. The primary bases for the invasion were in Kuwait and other Persian Gulf nations.
and this
Coalition troops launched an air and amphibious assault on the Al-Faw peninsula during the closing hours of 19 March to secure the oil fields there; the amphibious assault was supported by warships of the Royal Navy, Polish Navy, and Royal Australian Navy.
again if you look at the map you'll see flying over Iran made the attack on Al-Faw impractical but attack from their carrier in Persian gulf is something else.
and again Kuwait
In the meantime, Royal Air Force Tornados from 9 and 617 Squadrons attacked the radar defence systems protecting Baghdad, but lost a Tornado on 22 March along with the pilot and navigator (Flight Lieutenant Kevin Main and Flight Lieutenant Dave Williams), shot down by an American Patriot missile as they returned to their airbase in Kuwait.[142]

oh and this time turkey
Hours after the first of such flights, Turkey did allow the use of its air space and the rest of the 10th SFG infiltrated in. The preliminary mission was to destroy the base of the Kurdish terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, believed to be linked to al-Qaeda. Concurrent and follow-on missions involved attacking and fixing Iraqi forces in the north, thus preventing their deployment to the southern front and the main effort of the invasion.[157]

and again both Turkey and Kuwait
Members of the Coalition included Australia: 2,000 invasion, [Poland]: 200 invasion—2,500 peak, Spain: 1,300 invasion United Kingdom: 46,000 invasion, United States: 150,000 to 250,000 invasion. Other members of the coalition were Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Palau, Panama, the Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Tonga, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.[171]
Click to expand...

Good after enlighten you about 2003 Iraqi if you interested i can also talk about Afghanistan war
 
Last edited:
.
Lol buddy please. Israel can sneak into Iran with f35s and get away with it. Now imagine what the entire USAF and USN can do. Iran is pretty much nothing in front of the USA. They have a bunch of crappy tomcats and mig29s barely holding together.


Iran certainly does fund and train terrorists currently responsible for killing your so called muslim brothers in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Pakistan and many other places though. USA can do this stuff because it has power, i have no doubt Iran wants to as well but it cant.
You seem to either have your :cuckoo:wires crossed:cuckoo: there my friend,or maybe you`re just a big fan of 💩arab propaganda💩."Israel can sneak into Iran with f35s",yeah,right. :rofl:
Its just a suggestion,but you might just want to check the range of an f35,oh and look at a map of the middle east/persian gulf region too....
You come off sounding like yet another fellow so obsessed with manned air power that hes seemingly blind to the capabilities of other types of air power,such as precision guided missiles and drones,of which iran has the largest arsenal by far in the entire mena region.
I seem to remember that the us didnt do jack sh!t after iran attacked ayn alassad,and this was despite trumps threat of war if iran dared to retaliate in any way,so something tells me that the us does not share your [dubious] estimation of irans [supposed] lack of military capabilities.

If it wasnt for iran syria today would be a failed state,probably run by a mixture of ethno-supremacists/ethno-separatists and actual terrorists like isis/al-qaeda/the white helmets,and other assorted "moderate" ie western backed terrorists,and they certainly arent irans "muslim brothers" by any stretch of the imagination.
If it hadnt been for iran southern lebanon would today still be occupied by the israelis
If it wasnt for iran the palestinians wouldnt even have the weapons that they`ve got,their own arab bretherin on the other hand,well I guess they`re just too busy brown nosing the zionists to find the time to help them,funny that,eh?
Pakistan?,not sure where you`re coming from there m8,unless of course you`re talking about anti iranian terror groups using pakistani territory as a base?,or maybe its just more deluded arab propaganda.
Actually the last time I looked it was the us who was killing pakistanis at will,hundreds of them in fact,for over 14 years and all the while pakistans various governments either said nothing and turned a blind eye or made barely a fart of easily ignored protest.
 
. .
didn't want to post it again but you left me no choice



I knew you guys feel guilty on your role in attacking Iraq but its not the reason to spread lies about it and blame Iran
these are the route used for the 2003 attack
Iraq_War_2003_Map1.PNG

Iraq_War_2003_Map2.PNG

and now the interesting Image , yes the turkey route
Iraq-War-Map.jpg

now let see what happened


you see submarine in Persian gulf fire their missiles directly into Iraq but what about the ones in Red Sea can they fire directly into Iraq or you think their missiles fly over Iran !!? For reference here a map of Middle east
MEast-pol.png

now let see the rest of the story

and this

again if you look at the map you'll see flying over Iran made the attack on Al-Faw impractical but attack from their carrier in Persian gulf is something else.
and again Kuwait


oh and this time turkey


and again both Turkey and Kuwait


Good after enlighten you about 2003 Iraqi if you interested i can also talk about Afghanistan war
You are explaining the obvious thing to morons. Don't expect them to learn or even remember what you told them.

They have a receiver of BBC and VOA on top of their throats instead of a head.
 
. . .
didn't want to post it again but you left me no choice



I knew you guys feel guilty on your role in attacking Iraq but its not the reason to spread lies about it and blame Iran
these are the route used for the 2003 attack
Iraq_War_2003_Map1.PNG

Iraq_War_2003_Map2.PNG

and now the interesting Image , yes the turkey route
Iraq-War-Map.jpg

now let see what happened


you see submarine in Persian gulf fire their missiles directly into Iraq but what about the ones in Red Sea can they fire directly into Iraq or you think their missiles fly over Iran !!? For reference here a map of Middle east
MEast-pol.png

now let see the rest of the story

and this

again if you look at the map you'll see flying over Iran made the attack on Al-Faw impractical but attack from their carrier in Persian gulf is something else.
and again Kuwait


oh and this time turkey


and again both Turkey and Kuwait


Good after enlighten you about 2003 Iraqi if you interested i can also talk about Afghanistan war

Did i claim the US used iranian airspace? U posted all that stuff for nothing. My point was that iran was happy the US took down saddam. Gave them an opening into iraq. Another invasion by ISIS gave them full control.
 
. .
So after Iran killed dozens of US-backed terrorists in northern Iraq with rain of missiles and drones, US shot down a drone (which they said got close to them), and condemned Iran.

Oh, I forgot, US also v vowed strong response. that's also very important :lol:
 
.
Did i claim the US used iranian airspace? U posted all that stuff for nothing. My point was that iran was happy the US took down saddam. Gave them an opening into iraq. Another invasion by ISIS gave them full control.
Iran condemned USA attack on Iraq in 2003 , after Iraq was sent out of Kuwait, Iran repeatedly demand USA and co forces leave the region , we have solved our problem with Iraq after the war . we never wished an American appointed governor in Iraq . and we never assisted them in attacking Saddam .
a question foe you what benefit removing Saddam would have brought Iran , Iraq war machine was destroyed , there was no threat for Iran , in Saddam was keeping group like ISIS and alqaeda and Kurdish separatist in check , his presence in Iraq would have benefited us. till he was in rule , no separatist or cannibal could do anything there and after attack on Kuwait west and east make sure that his military don't become strong , a perfect man there . not any threat for us , but just strong enough to calm western border.
honestly what more you think we might have wanted in Iraq

Iran destroyed Iraq after Saddam.
that was Sahib uncle Sam work
Why not fire some missiles using drones on Tehran?
expensive solution

So after Iran killed dozens of US-backed terrorists in northern Iraq with rain of missiles and drones, US shot down a drone (which they said got close to them), and condemned Iran.

Oh, I forgot, US also v vowed strong response. that's also very important :lol:
if it was up to me for making a point to them would have flew a shahed-171 or shahed-191 over their head and drop a dummy bomb in middle of their base , to deliver a message again.
just like when in syria that they shoot down two shahed-129 which were being used against ISIS because they said it become closer than 100km to their base and then we bombed ISIS terrorist who made bases 4km away from their bases with Saeqeh and for 24 hours they were investigating what have happened .
 
Last edited:
.
Good kill good kill. Iran should stay away from Iraq. Iran destroyed Iraq after Saddam. Why not fire some missiles using drones on Tehran? These proxy kids will not learn until the United states attack directly on Iran.

How do you managed to get (-14) as a "pure pakistani" at a pakistani forum?
 
.
You seem to either have your :cuckoo:wires crossed:cuckoo: there my friend,or maybe you`re just a big fan of 💩arab propaganda💩."Israel can sneak into Iran with f35s",yeah,right. :rofl:
Its just a suggestion,but you might just want to check the range of an f35,oh and look at a map of the middle east/persian gulf region too....
You come off sounding like yet another fellow so obsessed with manned air power that hes seemingly blind to the capabilities of other types of air power,such as precision guided missiles and drones,of which iran has the largest arsenal by far in the entire mena region.
I seem to remember that the us didnt do jack sh!t after iran attacked ayn alassad,and this was despite trumps threat of war if iran dared to retaliate in any way,so something tells me that the us does not share your [dubious] estimation of irans [supposed] lack of military capabilities.

If it wasnt for iran syria today would be a failed state,probably run by a mixture of ethno-supremacists/ethno-separatists and actual terrorists like isis/al-qaeda/the white helmets,and other assorted "moderate" ie western backed terrorists,and they certainly arent irans "muslim brothers" by any stretch of the imagination.
If it hadnt been for iran southern lebanon would today still be occupied by the israelis
If it wasnt for iran the palestinians wouldnt even have the weapons that they`ve got,their own arab bretherin on the other hand,well I guess they`re just too busy brown nosing the zionists to find the time to help them,funny that,eh?
Pakistan?,not sure where you`re coming from there m8,unless of course you`re talking about anti iranian terror groups using pakistani territory as a base?,or maybe its just more deluded arab propaganda.
Actually the last time I looked it was the us who was killing pakistanis at will,hundreds of them in fact,for over 14 years and all the while pakistans various governments either said nothing and turned a blind eye or made barely a fart of easily ignored protest.
Lol im sure Iranian missiles are such a threat to the US homesoil. Perhaps the Iranian nuclear program can balance things ou....oh wait, Iranian scientists keep getting killed by the Mossad and CIA. Iran could severely damage foreign installations of the USA even in a conventional war but pretty much every scenario ends in a US victory. Maybe Iran should focus on not enforcing hijab on women and using birdshot against civilians first. Also i wonder whose UAV we shot down over Balochistan.
 
.
Did i claim the US used iranian airspace? U posted all that stuff for nothing. My point was that iran was happy the US took down saddam. Gave them an opening into iraq. Another invasion by ISIS gave them full control.

How do you managed to get (-15) as a "pure pakistani" at a pakistani forum?
 
.
well , if we have karrar with Anti air capabiltiy , this is prefect time to test them ....
 
.
Iran condemned USA attack on Iraq in 2003 , after Iraq was sent out of Kuwait, Iran repeatedly demand USA and co forces leave the region , we have solved our problem with Iraq after the war . we never wished an American appointed governor in Iraq . and we never assisted them in attacking Saddam .
a question foe you what benefit removing Saddam would have brought Iran , Iraq war machine was destroyed , there was no threat for Iran , in Saddam was keeping group like ISIS and alqaeda and Kurdish separatist in check , his presence in Iraq would have benefited us. till he was in rule , no separatist or cannibal could do anything there and after attack on Kuwait west and east make sure that his military don't become strong , a perfect man there . not any threat for us , but just strong enough to calm western border.
honestly what more you think we might have wanted in Iraq


that was Sahib uncle Sam work

expensive solution


if it was up to me for making a point to them would have flew a shahed-171 or shahed-191 over their head and drop a dummy bomb in middle of their base , to deliver a message again.
just like when in syria that they shoot down two shahed-129 which were being used against ISIS because they said it become closer than 100km to their base and then we bombed ISIS terrorist who made bases 4km away from their bases with Saeqeh and for 24 hours they were investigating what have happened .

Lolz u seriously have no idea what u r talking about. The US invasion of iraq and later ISIS provided iran an opening and reason to enter iraq, something iran been dreaming about since hundreds of years. Already iran had support of a section of shia population and now they r fully inside iraq and not even letting them have a stable govt. It gave iran a route to syria and lebanon. I dont know if u r dumb or acting like one but iranians always wanted this and have been planning for it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom