US Politics

[Darmashkian]

Trump seems to be surging big league, and for once it looks like he's being helped along by the MSM with their focusing on the FBI e-mail investigation in the final week of the race. All the momentum seems to be with him, he's tied in a lot of states with some polls even having him in a slim (within margin of error) lead.

Their closing messages are also a contrast with Donald being positive about where he wants to take them while she's still ranting about him being racist, sexist, xeno/islamophobe etc and blaming the FBI, a surrogate paper recently reported that the agency is 67% white male so they're out to get her.

Trump's election will be the death of the social justice warrior movement/disease, the cultural impact will be tremendous. So, for this, and many other reasons, I hope he wins.. and it's looking quite good for now, let's see..

I don't know how it'll go, he might lose, he might win, but should he win a landslide, I won't be surprised.

good luck for you exams.

Thanks a lot mate
-------------------------------------------------------------
I came back to post this only
OMG!!!


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-clinton-one-state-away-from-losing-electoral


Hillary Clinton is one state away from losing the presidential election, FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver said Sunday.


While the Democratic presidential nominee has a 65.7 percent chance of winning the presidency on Tuesday, she is not "in a terribly safe position," the pollster said on ABC's "This Week."
"The electoral map is actually less solid for Clinton than it was for Obama four years ago," Silver said.

Silver came to notoriety by correctly predicting President Obama's victories in 2008 and 2012.

Clinton is weaker among Midwestern voters, while Obama had leads in states like Ohio.

In FiveThirtyEight's election forecast, Clinton has the 270 electoral votes needed to clinch the White House.

"Clinton has about 270, so she's one state away from losing the Electoral College," he said.

"You would rather be in her shoes than [Republican nominee] Donald Trump, but she's not in a terribly safe position."

https://twitter.com/x/status/795297179384639488

 

[T-72]

Thanks a lot mate
-------------------------------------------------------------
I came back to post this only
OMG!!!


http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...-clinton-one-state-away-from-losing-electoral


Hillary Clinton is one state away from losing the presidential election, FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver said Sunday.


While the Democratic presidential nominee has a 65.7 percent chance of winning the presidency on Tuesday, she is not "in a terribly safe position," the pollster said on ABC's "This Week."
"The electoral map is actually less solid for Clinton than it was for Obama four years ago," Silver said.

Silver came to notoriety by correctly predicting President Obama's victories in 2008 and 2012.

Clinton is weaker among Midwestern voters, while Obama had leads in states like Ohio.

In FiveThirtyEight's election forecast, Clinton has the 270 electoral votes needed to clinch the White House.

"Clinton has about 270, so she's one state away from losing the Electoral College," he said.

"You would rather be in her shoes than [Republican nominee] Donald Trump, but she's not in a terribly safe position."

https://twitter.com/x/status/795297179384639488

Nate Silver is a joke, look up what odds he gave Trump in the primaries, and that should be enough to disqualify him given where we are now.

Though he did also sort of predict that if a certain major league baseball team won the championship, Trump too would win the election or something

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/politics-government/election/article112491722.html

https://www.dogonews.com/2016/11/3/...ar-championship-drought-with-world-series-win

 

[Desert Fox]

Trump seems to be surging big league, and for once it looks like he's being helped along by the MSM with their focusing on the FBI e-mail investigation in the final week of the race. All the momentum seems to be with him, he's tied in a lot of states with some polls even having him in a slim (within margin of error) lead.

Their closing messages are also a contrast with Donald being positive about where he wants to take them while she's still ranting about him being racist, sexist, xeno/islamophobe etc and blaming the FBI, a surrogate paper recently reported that the agency is 67% white male so they're out to get her.

Trump's election will be the death of the social justice warrior movement/disease, the cultural impact will be tremendous. So, for this, and many other reasons, I hope he wins.. and it's looking quite good for now, let's see..

I don't know how it'll go, he might lose, he might win, but if he wins in a landslide, I won't be surprised.

good luck for you exams.

Hillary has nothing new to offer for the most part, and what little she does have to offer will prove disastrous for this country which is why in all of her rallies she only bashes Trump rather than explain her strategy of which direction she wants to take America.

Regarding the FBI being against her because they're 67% White males, i believe this is the media's way of deflecting focus away from Hillary's corruption and focusing instead on race again in order to confuse the voters. One should ask why weren't they bringing up the "67% White male" theory in June when Comey absolved her? Reality is that White male or not, anyone in law enforcement hates the crooked hag for all of her corrupt dealings. I have three friends, all of them in law enforcement, one Pakistani and the other two Palestinians, and they hate the corrupt hag as well and will be voting Trump.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Hillary's poll numbers are on the rise again.

Note, majority of white voters with a four-year college degree are supporting Hillary. And she leads with 18% among white woman with college degree.

In a nutshell, Hillary is the choice of educated voters, what does it tells us?!


View attachment 349833


Hillary Clinton Leads Donald Trump by 4 Points in Latest Poll
Wall Street Journal/NBC poll finds 44% of likely voters support Mrs. Clinton compared with 40% support for Mr. Trump

View attachment 349834


A significant weak spot for Mr. Trump is among college-educated white voters—a voting bloc that 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney won by 14 percentage points, exit polls found. Now, Mrs. Clinton leads among white voters with a four-year college degree by 7 points, 47% to 40%, on a ballot that includes third-party voters.

Among white women with a college degree, Mr. Trump is losing by an even larger margin, 18 percentage points. And by 8 points, Mr. Trump trails among suburban women, an important swing group that makes up nearly a third of the electorate.

On the other hand, Mr. Trump continues to be dominant among white voters without four-year college degrees, winning them by a margin of 57% to 25% on a ballot with third-party candidates. That 32-point edge compares with Mr. Romney’s 25-point margin in 2012.

In one significant finding, the poll found that Mrs. Clinton leads by 12 percentage points among people who say they have already voted, likely a sign that Mrs. Clinton’s drive to get her supporters to vote early is paying off. Some 51% of early voters support Mrs. Clinton; 39% support Mr. Trump. Link

Hillary's poll numbers are on the rise again.

Note, majority of white voters with a four-year college degree are supporting Hillary. And she leads with 18% among white woman with college degree.

In a nutshell, Hillary is the choice of educated voters, what does it tells us?!


View attachment 349833


Hillary Clinton Leads Donald Trump by 4 Points in Latest Poll
Wall Street Journal/NBC poll finds 44% of likely voters support Mrs. Clinton compared with 40% support for Mr. Trump

View attachment 349834


A significant weak spot for Mr. Trump is among college-educated white voters—a voting bloc that 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney won by 14 percentage points, exit polls found. Now, Mrs. Clinton leads among white voters with a four-year college degree by 7 points, 47% to 40%, on a ballot that includes third-party voters.

Among white women with a college degree, Mr. Trump is losing by an even larger margin, 18 percentage points. And by 8 points, Mr. Trump trails among suburban women, an important swing group that makes up nearly a third of the electorate.

On the other hand, Mr. Trump continues to be dominant among white voters without four-year college degrees, winning them by a margin of 57% to 25% on a ballot with third-party candidates. That 32-point edge compares with Mr. Romney’s 25-point margin in 2012.

In one significant finding, the poll found that Mrs. Clinton leads by 12 percentage points among people who say they have already voted, likely a sign that Mrs. Clinton’s drive to get her supporters to vote early is paying off. Some 51% of early voters support Mrs. Clinton; 39% support Mr. Trump. Link

Final poll: Clinton leads Trump by 3 as voters lock in

The last POLITICO/Morning Consult horse-race poll before Election Day finds undecided voters making up their minds as Nov. 8 approaches. Read more



Clinton leads by five points nationally as Trump personality concerns persist, Post-ABC Tracking Poll finds Read more

 

[T-72]

Hillary has nothing new to offer for the most part, and what little she does have to offer will prove disastrous for this country which is why in all of her rallies she only bashes Trump rather than explain her strategy of which direction she wants to take America.

Regarding the FBI being against her because they're 67% White males, i believe this is the media's way of deflecting focus away from Hillary's corruption and focusing instead on race again in order to confuse the voters. One should ask why weren't they bringing up the "67% White male" theory in June when Comey absolved her? Reality is that White male or not, anyone in law enforcement hates the crooked hag for all of her corrupt dealings. I have three friends, all of them in law enforcement, one Pakistani and the other two Palestinians, and they hate the corrupt hag as well and will be voting Trump.

wow nice 1, mashallah !

I've been hearing from other unlikely places too that there is a groundswell of support for Trump.

crooked Hillary, otoh, has virtually 0 independent support from any blogger/tweeter/vlogger of repute, the only people who have ever spoken up for her have been the media talking heads and big celebrities etc. I'm yet to come across a single good case for hillary, her side's entire argument begins and ends with "he's a racist kkk islamophobe..."

low/bad/-ve energy messaging, and Trump is a master media manipulator, stole their message even, they're going low, and he's going high !















a Trump loss would be such an anticlimax, no way the Illuminati would break the trance now, right ?

 

[RabzonKhan]

A well-known progressive who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries, the host of, The Young Turks, Cenk Uygur, has announced that he is supporting Hillary for president.


America needs a brave leader, not bravado.

 

[T-72]

A well-known progressive who supported Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries, the host of, The Young Turks, Cenk Uygur, has announced that he is supporting Hillary for president.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Hillary Clinton Is Leading In A Greater Portion Of Polls Than Obama Was In The Last Two Elections

Things are looking good for the Democratic nominee.

Hillary Clinton has consistently led in a greater portion of presidential polls in the two months heading into Election Day than President Barack Obama did in both 2008 and 2012.

The Democratic nominee is ahead of GOP nominee Donald Trump in 93 percent of polls conducted in the two months before Election Day. Trump leads in just 3 percent of the polls. Another 3 percent of polls show a tied race.

The ratio of the surveys she leads in is slightly less when polls with third-party candidates are analyzed.

Overall, these statistics reflect a greater level of certainty of Clinton’s position as the leader than was present for Obama in 2008 and 2012. Obama led in 83 percent of polls against Sen. John McCain, who led in 11 percent, in 2008. The 2012 race was closer and that uncertainty was reflected in the lower ratio of polls Obama led to former Gov. Mitt Romney: 62 percent to 26 percent.

Read more

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[C130]

Even Atheists and non-religious folks are freaked out by this revelation. Who wouldn't be freaked out honestly when they're talking about consuming "breast milk mixed with fresh semen, pigs blood and fresh morning urine" to gain some kind of "spiritual advantage". This is some really disturbing sh!t.

Here is Marina Abramovic, Podesta's close acquaintance holding
the famous goats head that symbolizes the occult deity the Baphomet.
View attachment 349824​

View attachment 349822

View attachment 349827

Here's John Podesta
View attachment 349825

View attachment 349826

@Nilgiri @T-72 @RabzonKhan @C130 @vostok @ptldM3​

Here is more from this freak show Marina Abramovic

View attachment 349829

the NWO elites are heavily into satanism and pedophilia.

 

[T-72]

huffingtonpost

 

[RabzonKhan]

"Once the lawsuit hit, state education officials started hammering the school for operating under the name “university,” since it was never chartered as such and was operating as an “illegal educational institution.” So that same year, Trump changed the name to the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative. Already outed as a fraud, though, the business shut down a year later."


Trump University

Launched: 2005

Service rendered: For-profit, non-accredited fake business degrees

Years in business: 6

What went wrong: For a “school” that can’t actually give you any sort of recognized degree, $35,000 is a hell of a lot of money to spend on tuition. Especially when that school, according to the lawsuit four students filed against the business in 2010, consists of classes described as “extended infomercials,” sells “non-accredited products,” and takes “advantage of these troubled economic times to prey on consumer’s fears.”

Once the lawsuit hit, state education officials started hammering the school for operating under the name “university,” since it was never chartered as such and was operating as an “illegal educational institution.” So that same year, Trump changed the name to the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative. Already outed as a fraud, though, the business shut down a year later.

 

[LA se Karachi]

The Huffington Post has a very respectable polling aggregate arm. It has nothing to do with their writers. They put out an election forecast based on polls conducted by reputable pollsters.

 

[RabzonKhan]

TRUMP UNIVERSITY: IT’S WORSE THAN YOU THINK

"Once the lawsuit hit, state education officials started hammering the school for operating under the name “university,” since it was never chartered as such and was operating as an “illegal educational institution.” So that same year, Trump changed the name to the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative. Already outed as a fraud, though, the business shut down a year later."


Trump University

View attachment 349859


Launched: 2005

Service rendered: For-profit, non-accredited fake business degrees

Years in business: 6

What went wrong: For a “school” that can’t actually give you any sort of recognized degree, $35,000 is a hell of a lot of money to spend on tuition. Especially when that school, according to the lawsuit four students filed against the business in 2010, consists of classes described as “extended infomercials,” sells “non-accredited products,” and takes “advantage of these troubled economic times to prey on consumer’s fears.”

View attachment 349860


Once the lawsuit hit, state education officials started hammering the school for operating under the name “university,” since it was never chartered as such and was operating as an “illegal educational institution.” So that same year, Trump changed the name to the Trump Entrepreneur Initiative. Already outed as a fraud, though, the business shut down a year later.

Hillary is absolutely right for calling Trump a “fraud” who is “trying to scam America the way he scammed all those people at Trump University.”


TRUMP UNIVERSITY: IT’S WORSE THAN YOU THINK

Following the release, earlier this week, of testimony filed in a federal lawsuit against Trump University, the United States is facing a high-stakes social-science experiment. Will one of the world’s leading democracies elect as its President a businessman who founded and operated a for-profit learning annex that some of its own employees regarded as a giant ripoff, and that the highest legal officer in New York State has described as a classic bait-and-switch scheme?

If anyone still has any doubt about the troubling nature of Donald Trump’s record, he or she should be obliged to read the affidavit of Ronald Schnackenberg, a former salesman for Trump University. Schnackenberg’s testimony was one of the documents unsealed by a judge in the class-action suit, which was brought in California by some of Trump University’s disgruntled former attendees.

Schnackenberg, who worked in Trump’s office at 40 Wall Street, testified that “while Trump University claimed it wanted to help consumers make money in real estate, in fact Trump University was only interested in selling every person the most expensive seminars they possibly could.” The affidavit concludes, “Based upon my personal experience and employment, I believe that Trump University was a fraudulent scheme, and that it preyed upon the elderly and uneducated to separate them from their money.”

In one sense, the latest revelations don’t break much new ground. Back in 2013, when the office of Eric Schneiderman, New York’s Attorney General, filed a civil lawsuit against Trump and some of his associates, the complaint, which is also worth reading in full, made perfectly clear what sort of organization it was targeting. Despite Trump University’s claim that it offered “graduate programs, post graduate programs, doctorate programs,” it wasn’t a university at all. It was a company that purported to be selling Trump’s secret insights into how to make money in real estate. From the time Trump University began operating, in 2005, the A.G.’s office repeatedly warned the company that it was breaking the law by calling itself a university. (In New York State, universities have to obtain a state charter.)

That was the bait—or, rather, the initial bait. According to the Attorney General’s complaint, the free classes were merely a marketing device. There, Trump University’s instructors “engaged in a methodical, Systematic Series of misrepresentations” designed to convince students to sign up for a three-day seminar, where they would learn Trump’s personal techniques and strategies for investing, at a cost of about fifteen hundred dollars.

When it began, Trump University offered online classes, but it quickly switched its focus to live classes and seminars, the first of which was free to attend. One of the company’s ads said of Trump, “He’s the most celebrated entrepreneur on earth. . . . And now he’s ready to share—with Americans like you—the Trump process for investing in today’s once-in-a-lifetime real estate market.” The ad said that Trump had “hand-picked” Trump University’s instructors, and it ended with a quote from him: “I can turn anyone into a successful real estate investor, including you.”

In fact, Trump hadn’t handpicked the instructors, and he didn’t attend the three-day seminars. Moreover, the complaint said, “no specific Donald Trump techniques or strategies were taught during the seminars, Donald Trump ‘never’ reviewed any of Trump University’s curricula or programming materials, nor did he review any of the content for the free seminars or the three day seminars.” So what were the attendees taught? According to the complaint, “the contents and material presented by Trump University were developed in large part by a third-party company that creates and develops materials for an array of motivational speakers and Seminar and timeshare rental companies.” The closest that the attendees at the seminars got to Trump was when they were encouraged to have their picture taken with a life-size photo of him.

The alleged scam didn’t stop there. Trump University instructors told people who attended the three-day seminars that this wasn’t enough time to learn how to succeed, and encouraged them to purchase additional “mentorship” programs, which cost up to thirty-five thousand dollars. The complaint explained,

This bait and switch was laid out in the Trump University Playbook (“Playbook”), which provided step-to-step directions to Trump University instructors on what to tell students during the seminars. . . . Trump University instructors and staff were given detailed guidance as to how to build rapport and approach consumers one-on-one to encourage further purchases. Trump University representatives were explicitly instructed to push the highest priced Elite programs. Even when students hesitated to purchase the expensive programs, Trump representatives were provided stock responses to encourage purchases, including encouraging students to go into debt to pay for the Elite programs.

The newly released documents, which included actual Trump University playbooks (one was also uncovered by Politico earlier this year), provide more detail about the sales tactics that its employees used. Some of these methods, such as encouraging customers to max out their credit cards and playing psychological tricks on them, are familiar from the world of time-shares and other dodgy industries. “If they can afford the gold elite don’t allow them to think about doing anything besides the gold elite,” one of the playbooks advised the sales staff. At another point, the manual said, “Don’t ask people what they think about something you’ve said. Instead, always ask them how they feel about it. People buy emotionally and justify it logically.”

told the Times that other testimony in the California case had discredited the charges made by former employees. Hope Hicks, Trump’s campaign spokesperson, said that he was looking forward to his day in court.

So far, though, Trump has failed in his efforts to have the lawsuits in California and New York thrown out. And, whatever happens to the legal cases, the allegations will dog him all the way to November. On Wednesday, Hillary Clinton offered a preview of what is to come, calling Trump a “fraud” who is “trying to scam America the way he scammed all those people at Trump University.”

The Clinton campaign is clearly hoping that Trump University will be to Trump as Bain Capital was to Mitt Romney—a way to portray him as just another selfish rich guy who is out to profit at the expense of ordinary folk. Commenting on Twitter, Clinton’s press secretary, Brian Fallon, wrote, “Trump U is devastating because it’s metaphor for his whole campaign: promising hardworking Americans way to get ahead, but all based on lies.”

So will Trump University be the thing that brings Trump down? In a post for The New Republic, Brian Beutler argued that it will be “devastating” to him. On my Twitter feed, some people reacted more skeptically, pointing out that many of Trump’s supporters appear oblivious to any criticisms of him, and that Clinton isn’t necessarily the ideal prosecutor. It is also worth recalling that, in Italy, Silvio Berlusconi, another populist businessman, served as Prime Minister four times despite a list of allegations against him that included bribery, tax evasion, sexual misconduct, and having ties to the mafia.

One thing is clear, though. If the revelations about Trump University don’t do any damage to Trump, it’s time to worry—or worry even more—about American democracy. Link

 

[jha]

Looks like, a speaker at Hillary's rally trashed her policies... " there was no point in voting for the "lesser of two evils."