What's new

US, Pakistan forces maintaining coordination, says Pentagon

EagleEyes

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
16,774
Reaction score
25
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
There is daily and constant communication between the US-led forces in Afghanistan and the Pakistani military as Pakistan continues its operation against militants in North Waziristan, says the US Defence Department.
At a regular news briefing at the Pentagon, Press Secretary Admiral John Kirby said that the Zarb-i-Azb offensive was also “a testament to the degree to which Pakistan, the United States and Afghanistan have a shared threat and a shared challenge to deal with.”

So far, the US administration has been very cautious in commenting on the operation which began last week amidst fears that a strong US interest in the offensive could prove counter-productive.

Officials say US not involved in Zarb-i-Azb offensive
At recent briefings, officials at the White House and the State Department made it clear that this was a “Pakistan-led and Pakistan-executed” operation and the United States was not involved in it, directly or indirectly.

Admiral Kirby also emphasised this point but went a step ahead of his colleagues at other government departments in acknowledging that US-led forces in Afghanistan had maintained a close coordination with the Pakistani forces.

“There is daily, constant communication between the ISAF forces under General Joseph Dunford and the Pakistani counterparts on various levels,” said Admiral Kirby when asked if the United States was coordinating with Pakistan to ensure that the militants fleeing North Waziristan did not enter Afghanistan. “I won’t get into details about the specifics on this particular operation, but communication with the Pakistani military continues, and must continue.”

The admiral was more careful when asked to predict if Zarb-i-Azb would be successful. “The operation just began. And we’re not going to certainly rush to judgment here on how it proceeds. But “we obviously hope that the operation that the Pakistani military is conducting is successful, because it does represent a common enemy”.

Admiral Kirby also recalled the sacrifices of the Pakistan army in the fight against terrorists, saying that the Pentagon has never shied away from recognising these efforts.

“I said it before, but it’s worth reminding -- I mean, we recognise that the Pakistani military has taken casualties in this fight for many years. This isn’t the first time that they’ve conducted operations there,” he said.

The Pentagon spokesman noted that the recent attacks at the Karachi airport were “a very stark reminder” of how the threat of terrorism affects the Pakistani people. So, again, we wish them well, and we look forward to seeing them succeed.”

Asked if Pakistan would also target the Haqqani network, Admiral Kirby said he was not going to speak about the “intents and objectives” of an operation conducted by another army.

Responding to another question, the admiral said he did not know if Pakistan’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who visited the Pentagon this week, had sought US help for the operation.

US, Pakistan forces maintaining coordination, says Pentagon - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
 
The way American officials play semantics is so advanced, that not even most Americans realize what is being said, or what isn't being said.

The CIA's SAD (para-military/special forces if you will), which isn't even acknowledged by the government, is not under the command of the US military or ISAF, so technically they are not giving false information. It is an open secret that the SSG has worked with the SAD on a fairly regular basis, particularly with the drone-strike program, which is not a US military action.
 
Good Plan. Pak Army needs to keep the lines of Communication open with US/NATO Forces and share Intelligence to destroy and exterminate these TTP and Foreign Cockroaches.
 
The way American officials play semantics is so advanced, that not even most Americans realize what is being said, or what isn't being said.

The CIA's SAD (para-military/special forces if you will), which isn't even acknowledged by the government, is not under the command of the US military or ISAF, so technically they are not giving false information. It is an open secret that the SSG has worked with the SAD on a fairly regular basis, particularly with the drone-strike program, which is not a US military action.

And you know this how exactly? and if you do know something may i suggest you not to reveal this on a public forum as this may or can bring lives into danger. So please avoid
 
And you know this how exactly? and if you do know something may i suggest you not to reveal this on a public forum as this may or can bring lives into danger. So please avoid

All I know is what is publically available should one look. I do not have any sort of inside knowledge.

The only thing in danger with such vague information, is the idea that the United States is an enemy of Pakistan.
 
All I know is what is publically available should one look. I do not have any sort of inside knowledge.

The only thing in danger with such vague information, is the idea that the United States is an enemy of Pakistan.

United States may be an enemy of Pakistan but not bigger than the TTP. ;)
We have worked with the US for 60+ years, we'd rather work with them than the TTP.
 
United States may be an enemy of Pakistan but not bigger than the TTP. ;)
We have worked with the US for 60+ years, we'd rather work with them than the TTP.

Our definition of "enemy" is quite different should you consider it applies to the US.
 
Our definition of "enemy" is quite different should you consider it applies to the US.

There is a pun intended in my statement. US and Pakistan act against each other when our interests collide and work with each other when our interests are identical, thats how nation states work. Past 60 years US-Pakistan relationship has been turbulent but it has somehow worked. No country has done more to help the US than we have from mediating between the Chinese and US (Kissinger flew on our plane to Beijing), killing the Soviet Union as well as defeating Al-Qaeda in our region. There was a great price to pay though i think the world is much safer without USSR and our region is much safer with a weakened Al-Qaeda.
 
Our definition of "enemy" is quite different should you consider it applies to the US.

We are anything but enemies. I think you didnt get the pun intended in Aeronauts' post. Yes the relationship have not been for the best of the year award, but Pakistan and US have together achieved some great common goals and unlike the cold war era, i think this will continue even after US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom