What's new

US not interested in ending terrorism: Former US Marine

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
US not interested in ending terrorism: Former US Marine

Press TV has conducted an interview with Ken O’Keefe, a former US Marine and a peace activist from London, to discuss the ISIL Takfiri terrorist situation in the Middle East.

What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Do you see this as a project that the United States really wants to stop this terrorist group or not?

O’Keefe: Absolutely not, and I find it laughable that anybody would even consider the United States to be seriously interested in ending terrorism. We have had over 13 years of this farcical war on terror, all of it built on lies, from the false-flag of 9/11 to the non-prosecution of

Osama bin Laden because the FBI admitted that there was no evidence linking him to 9/11, from every policy since the invasion, occupation of Afghanistan, Iraq; the attack on Libya, destroying that country; attempting to fully destroy Syria, all of this is terrorism – terrorism on a grand scale!

Let’s throw in Israel and its genocide against the Palestinians, the use of white phosphorus, depleted uranium and all sorts of other weapons of mass destruction against a civilian population in Gaza, which is comprised of over 900,000 children, and you find that the United States is without question the number one terrorist of the 20th and 21st century.

How in the world can anyone seriously believe that the United States has any interest in ending terrorism? It is the ultimate terrorist. Its little boogeyman creations of al-Qaeda, ISIS, ISIL – whatever the hell they call themselves tomorrow – is nothing more than the boogeyman necessary to justify this military industrial complex which is running roughshod over the world.

Press TV: Does the killing of an American citizen always trigger a specific type of a reaction from the United States?

O’Keefe: These beheadings have largely been debunked. At the very least the people that are being executed in these videos are not alive. We know when you execute somebody by cutting off their head when their heart is still beating blood will pour forth very profusely. This is not the case with these videos.

It also is one massive manipulation to suggest that the life of one or two Americans somehow justifies yet another invasion and occupation in which we have destroyed three countries at the very minimum in terms of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

We have largely caused the breeding grounds for so-called terrorism all around the region. It is beggars’ belief that anyone would be manipulated in yet another policy in which invasion, bombing, occupation and ultimately destruction of entire areas is somehow going to make the world a better place. We have seen this all before and the United States is repeating its same role as it has been and it will make for more blood and more guts and more misery, and ultimately a breeding ground for those who see the West for what it is: absolutely hypocritical.

The West has no moral authority whatsoever. It is in no position at all to discuss any issue regarding morality because it is the most corrupt and most violent of all peoples on this planet.
The West is the problem, not the rest of the world.

Our little boogeyman that we create will stop once we stop having the power through the global reserve currency of the US dollar to be able to pay these psychopaths to run around and behead and so on and so forth.

Press TV: What kind of precedent does this send? -Because US President Barack Obama has basically sent a message to the Syria government that if the Syrian government attacks any of their airplanes that they will take out their anti-aircraft system, basically that they would be under attack.

What does this mean when you’re talking about a sovereign country that another country has the right to go in and do whatever they want? - Whether they agree or disagree with the way that government does this business. What type of precedent does this set?

O’Keefe: It is not a precedent at all. We have already been bombing Pakistan, Yemen. We have been running around the world and basically in a lawless kind of way have been carrying out policies including executions of anyone anywhere anytime based on the so-called president of the United States having a meeting and declaring somebody to be a terrorist.

This even includes American citizens. There is no sovereignty of nations. There is no international law. This so-called intelligence analyst, this intelligence analyst seems to be completely oblivious to the fact that it was the United States which supported the Mujahideen which became al-Qaeda, which morphed into the al-Nusra Front, then ISIS, ISIL, IS – whatever the hell you want to call it – has been funding these people, training these people, providing bases, training in Jordan and also in Turkey, their little proxies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar and Kuwait have been funneling money and arms.

And now we’re being told that they are going to be training these so-called moderate factions of resistance in Syria in Saudi Arabia. That bastion of moderate behavior, the Wahabi Saudi Arabia regime, one of the most offensive - if not the most offensive regimes - on the planet, a place that we give weapons and we give cover to, political cover, media cover.

The idea that an intelligence analyst could be so oblivious and so completely incompetent at its own field that he does not recognize that the United States having supported, armed, trained, coddled and protected all these terrorists for decades now is beyond belief.

He cannot be so stupid, surely, not to know that the United States has an inherent interest in propping up continuously one boogeyman after another to justify what I said earlier, the military industrial complex, the goal of full spectrum dominance, military bases all around the world, and people with half a brain know this.

Press TV: We are looking at this type of scenario that it seems to repeat itself time and time again, especially if we are looking at a post-9/11 world. As you have said, we see boogeyman after boogeyman sort of being created.

I want to look at then the American people and do you think that this time they had to take it or it appears that the extremist nature that ISIL is presenting itself was something that it had to be that extreme in order to shake the American people up, who are extremely war-weary but because of the extent of the violence that they’re seeing that actually they will get on the bandwagon for another war in the region?

O’Keefe: What we have really is an amazing point in human history in which the sleeping masses that are literally mind-controlled through many different mechanisms from childhood in schools we are brainwashed with all sorts of rubbish. Even the pledge of allegiance which I said along with every other school kid ends with “liberty and justice for all”.

We have been indoctrinated with incredible insanity that it becomes a reality for us, and many Americans are still caught up in that as are many people around the world. But we also have at this time a growing number of people who are recapturing the ability to think for themselves and to recognize the history of both the United States and the West in general, and also the crimes of others – let us not be oblivious to the crimes of others.

But at the end of the day I come from the West and what we can see is that my birth nation, the United States, is the number one terrorist. This is simply not debatable. I understand that many people are still being conned into believing this nonsense, the latest boogeyman creation, but ever-growing numbers of people are not buying it. They are not. And this is extremely promising and a necessary step for us to create a better world.

If we really wanted to end ISIS we would cut off their funding. And if we wanted to we could help the Iraqi government and the military and they could wipe them out in no time with a little bit of genuine financial support to be able to do what they need to do. Iran would be an excellent partner in this. I would encourage Iraq to invite Iran in to help them wipe them out, because Iran definitely has an interest in ending real terrorism. That is why the foreign minister all too rightly said we are not all too convinced that America is serious about it. I think he is way too diplomatic, quite frankly. But at the end of the day the United States is not serious about ending terrorism. It thrives on terrorism. Many Americans are growing up to understand this.

Press TV: What scenario is this setting up, Ken, if we are looking at on the one hand, as you said that the United States does not really want to end terrorism, and on the other hand they are directly once again involved in the region, not that they were not in the region but now more directly in Iraq and again Syria.

What is this setting up? Tell me, how do you see this basically? How are you reading what is going to happen with the United States getting involved with this situation with ISIL? What is it? Do you think that they really want to destroy them because perhaps they have served their purpose or no, do they just want to see this chaos continue in the region?

O’Keefe: Chaos in the region is extremely advantageous. The Project for a New American Century and Clean Break is an important document to read also. Also, Oded Yinon’s strategy for Israel in the 1980s made it very clear that Iraq was target number one because of its strong Arab nationalist dictatorship.

Ultimately in the overall scheme you have this fantasy’s agenda of greater Israel: Israel expanding as the next great empire into Iraq, into Syria, Lebanon, also in part of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt. This is their goal and it is a psychopath’s goal. Right now all of this chaos that you see in that region fits perfectly in line with strategy papers. The policy is being carried out exactly as it was written. And the seeds of sectarian hatred and divide, which are necessary to fracture the people of the region so that you will be in a weakened state and therefore be subject to the real intention and goal, is again to expand the Israeli empire.

Ultimately this is all going to fall flat on its face but right now the chaos that is being sewn is extremely advantageous for the powers that be.

PressTV - US not interested in ending terrorism: Former US Marine
 
.
They can't even if they wanted to & the reasons are too obvious.
 
.
They can't even if they wanted to & the reasons are too obvious.


Washington needs terrorism and chaos in the world. Peace around the world is "bad" for Washington's warmongers, You know why, don't you? If there weren't any conflicts, they would immediately create new ones and they actually constantly do in every continent on earth.
 
Last edited:
.
Washington needs terrorism and chaos in the world. Peace around the world is "bad" for Washington's warmongers, You know why, don't you? If there weren't any conflicts, they would immediately create one.
In long term it will hurt the U.S. Now that there is a power struggle between U.S & China , they are too distracted by Syria & Iraq instead of forming new strategic alliance with nations in Asia pacific. Presently i don't see any benefit to U.S from supporting any extremist group.
 
.
In long term it will hurt the U.S. Now that there is a power struggle between U.S & China , they are too distracted by Syria & Iraq instead of forming new strategic alliance with nations in Asia pacific. Presently i don't see any benefit to U.S from supporting any extremist group.


It's really all about weapons sales, energy and supporting Israel.
 
.
Of course they are not interested in ending terrorism. They care about their own geopolitical goals and influence, even if it means destabilizing middle eastern countries. Otherwise they would not have turned a blind eye on Saudis, funded rebels in Syria or sanctioning Iran.
 
.
Sigh, if only US understand that people will appreciate them more if they stop their lies and propaganda, not only will it be better for the countries that are fighting terrorism, poverty, etc but also for them because people will respect them. I am passionate about science and technology, and I really like what US have achieved in this field, imagine how much mankind can achieve if we all work towards development of the world together
 
.
how do you end terrorism?
it's a freaking ideology
you can't kill an idea

best we can do is get out of there and remove our military bases,embassies and consulates and let'em run wild and kill each other.
 
.
But they are surely interested in installing 'puppet' regimes in some countries.
 
.
upload_2014-9-21_20-0-44.png
 
.
Terrorism was alive and well in the world before 9/11 and after.

We could always go back to pre-9/11 and sit on the couch and doing nothing while a blurb is mentioned late in the news after the sports scores wrap up.
 
.
US loves terrorism as long as those terrorists don't kill Americans.They love uyghur terrorist,Syrian terrorists,Chechnyan terriorists.They have supported ISIS and Taliban,Bin ladin.They support evils as long as they can use them as a tool.
 
Last edited:
.
Sigh, if only US understand that people will appreciate them more if they stop their lies and propaganda, not only will it be better for the countries that are fighting terrorism, poverty, etc but also for them because people will respect them. I am passionate about science and technology, and I really like what US have achieved in this field, imagine how much mankind can achieve if we all work towards development of the world together


Exactly, there is no need for violence, war and terror, it doesn't benefit anyone in the long term.

Terrorism was alive and well in the world before 9/11 and after.

We could always go back to pre-9/11 and sit on the couch and doing nothing while a blurb is mentioned late in the news after the sports scores wrap up.


Washington always supported terror, you are right. They were always busy destablizing countries.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom