Do you know the difference between Japan and India? Japan was fighting on 2 fronts - With China & Russia on the west and USA on the east. USA also had Australia ad India as an ally with huge resources. Philippines also allied with USA giving it a close base. The most important reason why Japan lost was because it had no fuel - coal or oil. India has plenty of coal which it can liquefy to use for military. USA can't afford to travel 20000km across the ocean into India. Any nearby countries that support USA will be bombed by India. USA ships in IOR will be stranded. Diego Garcia's air defence has limited capabilities and can't prevent ballistic missiles. A single big missile is enough to take out DGarcia.
Israel could not be taken out because it is next door to Europe who would intervene and also provide base to USA to stop it. Also, middle east is backwards with almost no industry.
Talking like low IQ people about Australia, NZ is absurd. Australia and NZ has huge resource per capita. Any country with such huge resource and small population is bound to have wealth. Japan being an island is protected to some extent and had external peace for long time. Its empire lasted for 600 years until it fell from WW2, showing that it always enjoyed peace. But SKorea is facing NKorea just across the border and is in a state of war. If a country had peace traditionally, it still has it regardless of USA help. Those countries that don't have peace traditionally don't have it even with US help.
What you hate or love is irrelevant. What is logical matters more. Logically speaking, India has more chance of allying with China than with USA. China for all its rhetorics is a peaceful country and not a threat to India in any way. There will always be minor incidents but that does not change the major theme.